Literature DB >> 28661049

Which priority indicators to use to evaluate nursing care performance? A discussion paper.

Carl-Ardy Dubois1,2, Danielle D'amour1, Isabelle Brault1, Clémence Dallaire3, Johanne Déry1, Arnaud Duhoux1, Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay4, Luc Mathieu5, Hermès Karemere1, Arnaud Zufferey6.   

Abstract

AIMS: A discussion of an optimal set of indicators that can be used on a priority basis to assess the performance of nursing care.
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in conceptualization of nursing care performance, exemplified by the Nursing Care Performance Framework, have revealed a broad universe of potentially nursing-sensitive indicators. Organizations now face the challenge of selecting, from this universe, a realistic subset of indicators that can form a balanced and common scorecard.
DESIGN: Discussion paper drawing on a systematic assessment of selected performance indicators. DATA SOURCES: Previous works, based on systematic reviews of the literature published between 1990 - 2014, have contributed to the development of the Nursing Care Performance Framework. These works confirmed a robust set of indicators that capture the universe of content currently supported by the scientific literature and cover all major areas of nursing care performance. Building on these previous works, this study consisted in gathering the specific evidence supporting 25 selected indicators, focusing on systematic syntheses, meta-analyses and integrative reviews. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This study has identified a set of 12 indicators that have sufficient breadth and depth to capture the whole spectrum of nursing care and that could be implemented on a priority basis.
CONCLUSIONS: This study sets the stage for new initiatives aiming at filling current gaps in operationalization of nursing care performance. The next milestone is to set up the infrastructure required to collect data on these indicators and make effective use of them.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  healthcare improvement; nursing care performance; nursing care quality; nursing sensitive indicators; patient safety; performance management; performance measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28661049     DOI: 10.1111/jan.13373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  6 in total

1.  How does feedback shared with interprofessional health care teams shape nursing performance improvement systems? A rapid realist review protocol.

Authors:  Joachim Rapin; Joanie Pellet; Cedric Mabire; Sylvie Gendron; Carl-Ardy Dubois
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-22

Review 2.  An integrative review of leadership competencies and attributes in advanced nursing practice.

Authors:  Maud Heinen; Catharina van Oostveen; Jeroen Peters; Hester Vermeulen; Anita Huis
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2019-07-21       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Staffing, teamwork and scope of practice: Analysis of the association with patient safety in the context of rehabilitation.

Authors:  Carla Jomaa; Carl-Ardy Dubois; Isabelle Caron; Alexandre Prud'Homme
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 3.057

4.  Patient Education Regarding Fasting Recommendations to Shorten Fasting Times in Patients Undergoing Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Controlled Pilot Study.

Authors:  Harm H J van Noort; Carlijn R Lamers; Hester Vermeulen; Getty Huisman-de Waal; Ben J M Witteman
Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 1.159

5.  Measured and perceived effects of audit and feedback on nursing performance: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Émilie Dufour; Arnaud Duhoux; Jolianne Bolduc
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-01

6.  The impact of a multilevel interactive nursing quality control and audit application on nursing quality management.

Authors:  K O Pei-Ying; H O Chen-Shie; L I A O Pei-Hung
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2021-12-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.