Literature DB >> 28660654

Teleultrasound: How Accurate Are We?

Nader Z Rabie1, Adam T Sandlin2, Kevin A Barber2, Songthip Ounpraseuth2, Wendy Nembhard3, Everett F Magann2, Curtis Lowery2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound serves an important role in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies. Recently, there has been increased use of teleultrasound protocols. We aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and accuracy of teleultrasound.
METHODS: We conducted an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective cohort study determining the sensitivity and accuracy of teleultrasound. In addition, we evaluated the number of ultrasound examinations required to complete an anatomic survey. Only ultrasound examinations performed for anatomic surveys were included. Studies were excluded if performed before 16 completed weeks' gestation, if they had multiple gestations, or for reasons other than anatomy (eg, Doppler studies and fluid assessment). Prenatal diagnoses were compared with postnatal diagnoses obtained from a robust mandatory birth defects surveillance program that records all birth defects in the entire state, from deliveries before 20 weeks' gestation through infants up to 2 years of age.
RESULTS: A total of 2499 studies were evaluated; 2368 were included. The teleultrasound cohort had a congenital anomaly prevalence of 5.66%. The sensitivity of teleultrasound was 57.46%; the specificity was 98.21%; and the accuracy was 95.9%. Anatomic surveys were completed after 1 visit in 82% of patients, whereas 63% and 61% of the remaining patients required 2 and 3 visits, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Teleultrasound for prenatal diagnosis has similar sensitivity and accuracy as the published literature for on-site ultrasound. Further studies are needed to compare the sensitivity and accuracy within the same population and further validate this potentially cost-saving modality.
© 2017 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth defects; obstetric ultrasound; pregnancy; prenatal diagnosis; teleultrasound; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28660654     DOI: 10.1002/jum.14304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  3 in total

1.  Teleultrasound for pre-natal diagnosis: A validation study.

Authors:  Nader Z Rabie; Adam T Sandlin; Song Ounpraseuth; Wendy N Nembhard; Curtis Lowery; Kelly San Miguel; Everett Pat Magann
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-08-30

2.  Gynecologic Teleultrasound and COVID-19: Is There a Connection?

Authors:  Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Steven R Goldstein
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  Application of Tele-Ultrasound Robot During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Wenli Jiang; Xia Zhao; Tian Gan; Ying Liu; Shuilian Luo; Meifang Zhu; Sikai Chen; Yu Jiang; Meng Wu
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.754

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.