Gabriel Lopez1, Wenli Liu1, Kathrin Milbury1, Amy Spelman1, Qi Wei1, Eduardo Bruera1, Lorenzo Cohen2. 1. Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, Unit 460, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 2. Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, Unit 460, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. lcohen@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Massage has shown benefit for symptomatic relief in cancer patients and their caregivers. We explored the effects of a single massage session on self-reported symptoms in an outpatient clinic at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: Patients and caregivers receiving oncology massage treatments (30 or 60-min duration) at our Integrative Medicine Center outpatient clinic from September 2012 to January 2015 completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS; 0-10 scale, 10 most severe) pre and post massage. ESAS individual items and subscales of physical distress (PHS), psychological distress (PSS), and global distress (GDS) were analyzed. We used paired t tests with a p value correction (i.e., p < .001) to examine symptoms pre/post massage. RESULTS: Initial massage visits for 343 patients and 87 caregivers were analyzed. The highest symptom burdens (means) at baseline for patients were sleep 4.22, fatigue 3.57, and pain 2.94; for caregivers, sleep 3.77, well-being 3.01, and pain 2.59. Although patients reported significantly greater global distress and physical symptoms (p < .0001) compared to caregivers at baseline, groups did not differ in regard to psychological symptom burden (p = .66) and individual symptom scores (e.g., pain, sleep, spiritual pain). Massage therapy was associated with statistically (p < .0001) and clinically significant improvements in symptoms of pain, fatigue, anxiety, well-being, and sleep and ESAS subscales for both patients and caregivers. Greater massage duration (30 vs 60 min) did not lead to greater symptom reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and caregivers reported a moderately high symptom burden. A single massage treatment resulted in acute relief of self-reported symptoms in both groups. Further study is warranted regarding optimal massage dose and frequency.
BACKGROUND: Massage has shown benefit for symptomatic relief in cancerpatients and their caregivers. We explored the effects of a single massage session on self-reported symptoms in an outpatient clinic at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS:Patients and caregivers receiving oncology massage treatments (30 or 60-min duration) at our Integrative Medicine Center outpatient clinic from September 2012 to January 2015 completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS; 0-10 scale, 10 most severe) pre and post massage. ESAS individual items and subscales of physical distress (PHS), psychological distress (PSS), and global distress (GDS) were analyzed. We used paired t tests with a p value correction (i.e., p < .001) to examine symptoms pre/post massage. RESULTS: Initial massage visits for 343 patients and 87 caregivers were analyzed. The highest symptom burdens (means) at baseline for patients were sleep 4.22, fatigue 3.57, and pain 2.94; for caregivers, sleep 3.77, well-being 3.01, and pain 2.59. Although patients reported significantly greater global distress and physical symptoms (p < .0001) compared to caregivers at baseline, groups did not differ in regard to psychological symptom burden (p = .66) and individual symptom scores (e.g., pain, sleep, spiritual pain). Massage therapy was associated with statistically (p < .0001) and clinically significant improvements in symptoms of pain, fatigue, anxiety, well-being, and sleep and ESAS subscales for both patients and caregivers. Greater massage duration (30 vs 60 min) did not lead to greater symptom reduction. CONCLUSIONS:Patients and caregivers reported a moderately high symptom burden. A single massage treatment resulted in acute relief of self-reported symptoms in both groups. Further study is warranted regarding optimal massage dose and frequency.
Authors: Jean S Kutner; Marlaine C Smith; Lisa Corbin; Linnea Hemphill; Kathryn Benton; B Karen Mellis; Brenda Beaty; Sue Felton; Traci E Yamashita; Lucinda L Bryant; Diane L Fairclough Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-09-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: David Hui; Omar Shamieh; Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Pedro Emilio Perez-Cruz; Jung Hye Kwon; Mary Ann Muckaden; Minjeong Park; Sriram Yennu; Jung Hun Kang; Eduardo Bruera Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Amylou C Dueck; Ethan Basch; David Cella; Carolyn Miller Reilly; Lori M Minasian; Andrea M Denicoff; Ann M O'Mara; Michael J Fisch; Cynthia Chauhan; Neil K Aaronson; Corneel Coens; Deborah Watkins Bruner Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Gabriel Lopez; Kathrin Milbury; Minxing Chen; Yisheng Li; Eduardo Bruera; Lorenzo Cohen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-06-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Augusta Silveira; Teresa Sequeira; Joaquim Gonçalves; Pedro Lopes Ferreira Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2022-05-21 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Gabriel Lopez; Alejandro Chaoul; Catherine Powers-James; Carol A Eddy; Smitha Mallaiah; Telma I Gomez; Janet L Williams; Qi Wei; Eduardo Bruera; Lorenzo Cohen Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 3.279