| Literature DB >> 28659985 |
Abbas Heydari1, Ali Meshkinyazd2, Parvaneh Soudmand2.
Abstract
Objective: Nurses are the most important staff in the health care system, thus, their job satisfaction is important in nursing management. The present study aimed at determining the impact of teaching spiritual intelligence on the job satisfaction of psychiatric nurses. Method: The participants were divided into 2 groups by random allocation. Data were collected in 3 stages of before intervention, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks post intervention using Brayfield & Rother Job Satisfaction Questionnaire.Entities:
Keywords: Job Satisfaction; Psychiatric Nurses; Psychiatric Ward; Spiritual Intelligence
Year: 2017 PMID: 28659985 PMCID: PMC5483238
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Psychiatry ISSN: 1735-4587
Spiritual Intelligence Components Training Protocol
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Session 1 | Introducing the overall structure of the sessions, and |
| Session 2 | Training in the field of increasing self-consciousness |
| Session 3 | Training in the field of honesty with yourself and practice in |
| Session 4 | Training in the field of the intuitive meaning and its role in |
| Session 5 | Training in the field of addressing ethical issues and the |
| Session 6 | Training in the field of their capabilities to control |
| Session 7 | Training in the field of the concept of flexibility and its |
Demographic Characteristics in Teaching Spiritual Intelligence and Control
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| The number | The number | ||
| Age (years) | 33.0±4.3 | 32.0±4.2 | T = -0.412 |
| Marriage single | (22.3) 6 | (14.8)4 | Chi-square = 0.491 |
| (77.7)21 | (85.2)23 | ||
| Education level BS | ( 96.3)26 | (96.3)26 | Fisher Exact test = 1.000 |
| (3.7)1 | (3.7)1 | ||
| Employment status official | (22.2)6 | (29.6)8 | Chi-square = 0.386 |
| (77.8)21 | (70.4)19 | ||
Comparison of the Mean Score of Nurses' Job Satisfaction in Psychiatric Wards in the Two Groups Before the Intervention, One Month After the Intervention, and at Follow-up Two Months Later
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
| Before intervention | 65.5 | 64.4 | p=0.630 |
| One month after intervention | 69.8 | 5 5.8 | p=0.030 |
| At the 2-month follow-up | 72.5 | 5 6.5 | p=0.000 |
| p=0/000 | p=0.000 | ||