Literature DB >> 28658880

Ultrasonographic Estimation of Endotracheal Tube Size in Paediatric Patients and its Comparison with Physical Indices Based Formulae: A Prospective Study.

Jagadish G Sutagatti1, Ranjana Raja2, Madhuri S Kurdi3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Choosing the correct Endotracheal Tube (ETT) size is important in paediatric anaesthesia. The subglottic diameter being the narrowest diameter of the paediatric upper airway plays an important role in appropriate ETT size selection. AIM: This study was planned to determine the accuracy of Ultrasonography (USG) to assess the appropriate ETT size and compare it with physical indices based formulae. The secondary outcome was to assess the number of times the tube was changed based on air leak test for USG estimated tube size.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After ethical committee approval, a prospective clinical observational study for a period of one year was conducted on 75 children (power of study 80%, confidence interval 95%) aged one to 14 years of American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) I and II undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with orotracheal intubation. Parental consent was obtained. Pre-anaesthetic ultrasonography was performed on every patient at the subglottic region. The tracheal subglottic diameter was estimated to select the ETT size for cuffed and uncuffed tubes. The size estimated by USG and that based on age and height based formulae were compared with clinically used appropriate tube size. Data analysis was done using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0; One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and t-test for comparison were used.
RESULTS: USG predicted the appropriate ETT size (p<0.05) better than physical indices based formulae for cuffed and uncuffed tubes. The age based formula predicted the clinically used ETT size well (p=0.58) and the height based formula did not correlate with clinically used tube size (p=0.0002 - a statistically significant value). Eight patients required change of tube once.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographic estimation of subglottic diameter is useful for optimal paediatric ETT size selection. USG is effective in estimating the appropriate sized ETT both for cuffed and uncuffed tubes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cricoid cartilage; General anesthesia; Glottis; Intubation; Ultrasonography

Year:  2017        PMID: 28658880      PMCID: PMC5483782          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25905.9838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  9 in total

1.  Prediction of pediatric endotracheal tube size by ultrasonography.

Authors:  Masayuki Shibasaki; Yasufumi Nakajima; Sachiyo Ishii; Fumihiro Shimizu; Nobuaki Shime; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  The feasibility of ultrasound to assess subglottic diameter.

Authors:  Karim Lakhal; Xavier Delplace; Jean-Philippe Cottier; François Tranquart; Xavier Sauvagnac; Colette Mercier; Jacques Fusciardi; Marc Laffon
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Usefulness of ultrasound for selecting a correctly sized uncuffed tracheal tube for paediatric patients.

Authors:  J-Y Bae; H-J Byon; S-S Han; H-S Kim; J-T Kim
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Comparison of cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in young children during general anesthesia.

Authors:  H H Khine; D H Corddry; R G Kettrick; T M Martin; J J McCloskey; J B Rose; M C Theroux; M Zagnoev
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Dimensions of the cricoid cartilage and the trachea.

Authors:  A Randestad; C E Lindholm; P Fabian
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  How reliable is length-based determination of body weight and tracheal tube size in the paediatric age group? The Broselow tape reconsidered.

Authors:  C K Hofer; M Ganter; M Tucci; R Klaghofer; A Zollinger
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Accuracy of a new body length-based formula for predicting tracheal tube size in Chinese children.

Authors:  Ming-Hung Shih; Chin-Yang Chung; Bai-Chuan Su; Chao-Tsen Hung; Shu-Yam Wong; Teresa Kit-Man Wong
Journal:  Chang Gung Med J       Date:  2008 May-Jun

8.  Pediatric endotracheal tube selection: a comparison of age-based and height-based criteria.

Authors:  D Davis; L Barbee; D Ririe
Journal:  AANA J       Date:  1998-06

9.  Assessment of the subglottic region by ultrasonography for estimation of appropriate size endotracheal tube: A clinical prospective study.

Authors:  Kumkum Gupta; Prashant K Gupta; Bhawna Rastogi; Atul Krishan; Manish Jain; Gouri Garg
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2012 Jul-Dec
  9 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound in paediatric anaesthesia - A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Yumna Haroon-Mowahed; Su Cheen Ng; Sarah Barnett; Simeon West
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2020-07-23

2.  Analysis of the functionally-narrowest portion of the pediatric upper airway in sedated children.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Kwon; Young Hee Shin; Nam-Su Gil; Hyean Yeo; Ji Seon Jeong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Prediction of Endotracheal Tube Size in Pediatric Population Using Ultrasonographic Subglottic Diameter and Age-Related Formulas: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  B M Bharathi; Sharmila Somayaji; T Tulasi; N Kaleemullah Sheriff; Jaidev S Bagliker
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2022-06-14

4.  Is Ultrasonography a Better Method of Endotracheal Tube Size Estimation in Pediatric Age Group than the Conventional Physical Indices-Based Formulae?

Authors:  Md Alam Faseehullah
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2021-05-27

5.  The accuracy of ultrasound to predict endotracheal tube size for pediatric patients with congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  Jianhong Hao; Jie Zhang; Buhuai Dong; Zhenguo Luo
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.