Literature DB >> 28658754

Effect of Recumbent Body Positions on Dynamic Lung Function Parameters in Healthy Young Subjects.

Arvind Kumar Pal1, Sunita Tiwari2, Dileep Kumar Verma3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The change in body position can alter pulmonary functions parameters, therefore it is important to understand the physiological basis of these alteration. Ideally, spirometry is done in sitting position until the subject is unable to do so. Hospitalized patients often assume recumbent body positions irrespective of underlying pathology. Hence, need arises to find out best recumbent body positions for the benefit of these patients to make breathing comfortable for them. AIM: The aim of this study was to find out whether the change from the supine position to crook lying and Fowler's position (45° dorsal elevation) causes change in spirometric parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present work was carried out at Department of Physiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow. A total 131 apparently healthy individuals were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Lung function was assessed using a PC-based spirometer according to American Thoracic Society guideline in the supine, crook lying and Fowler's position (45° dorsal elevation).
RESULTS: The study consisted of 131 subjects (male 66%, female 34%), with mean age of 20.15±2.71 years and BMI 21.20±3.28 Kg/m2. Repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni test was used to compare the mean values between each body position. Compared with the other two positions, Fowler's position showed significantly (p<0.05) higher values for FVC, FEV1, PEF, FEF25-75%.
CONCLUSION: Recumbent body position influences spirometric parameters in young healthy subjects. We demonstrated that spirometric values are higher in the Fowler's position than in the supine or crook lying position. The results of this study will help in the selection of the best alternative position for the spirometry in bed ridden patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bedridden; Crook lying position; Fowler’s position; Spirometry

Year:  2017        PMID: 28658754      PMCID: PMC5483656          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25202.9828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  12 in total

1.  Spirometric reference values in a large Middle Eastern population.

Authors:  M Golshan; M Nematbakhsh; B Amra; R O Crapo
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 16.671

2.  Spirometric values in obese individuals. Effects of body position.

Authors:  G Gudmundsson; M Cerveny; D M Shasby
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  A comparison of spirometric values with subjects in standing and sitting positions.

Authors:  D J Pierson; N P Dick; T L Petty
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  [Influence of different body positions in vital capacity in patients on postoperative upper abdominal].

Authors:  Bruno Prata Martinez; Joilma Ribeiro Silva; Vanessa Salgado Silva; Mansueto Gomes Neto; Luiz Alberto Forgiarini Júnior
Journal:  Rev Bras Anestesiol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 0.964

5.  A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Crook Lying Position versus Sitting Position on Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Dharampal Singh Sudan; Harvinder Singh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-02-03

6.  Lung mechanics in sitting and horizontal body positions.

Authors:  P K Behrakis; A Baydur; M J Jaeger; J Milic-Emili
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Effects of the beach chair position, positive end-expiratory pressure, and pneumoperitoneum on respiratory function in morbidly obese patients during anesthesia and paralysis.

Authors:  Franco Valenza; Federica Vagginelli; Alberto Tiby; Silvia Francesconi; Giulio Ronzoni; Massimiliano Guglielmi; Marco Zappa; Ezio Lattuada; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  [Spirometric values of obese and non-obese subjects on orthostatic, sitting and supine positions].

Authors:  Nilsa Cristina Domingos-Benício; Ada Clarice Gastaldi; José Cláudio Perecin; Kátia de Miranda Avena; Rogério Contato Guimarães; Maria José Junho Sologuren; José Divino Lopes-Filho
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 1.209

9.  Seated and semi-recumbent positioning of the ventilated intensive care patient - effect on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics.

Authors:  Peter Thomas; Jennifer Paratz; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.210

10.  Effect of Different Positions on FVC and FEV1 Measurements of Asthmatic Patients.

Authors:  Ganeswara Rao Melam; Syamala Buragadda; Adel Alhusaini; Mohammed Abdulrahman Alghamdi; Mansour Saleh Alghamdi; Parmveer Kaushal
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-04-23
View more
  2 in total

1.  Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement.

Authors:  Brian L Graham; Irene Steenbruggen; Martin R Miller; Igor Z Barjaktarevic; Brendan G Cooper; Graham L Hall; Teal S Hallstrand; David A Kaminsky; Kevin McCarthy; Meredith C McCormack; Cristine E Oropez; Margaret Rosenfeld; Sanja Stanojevic; Maureen P Swanney; Bruce R Thompson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Transradial peripheral vascular intervention using Fowler's position and Terumo R2P system for patients with heart failure: two case reports.

Authors:  Akihiro Nakamura; Kenjiro Sato; Hideaki Endo
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.