Literature DB >> 28658607

Phylogenomics and comparative genomic studies delineate six main clades within the family Enterobacteriaceae and support the reclassification of several polyphyletic members of the family.

Seema Alnajar1, Radhey S Gupta2.   

Abstract

The family Enterobacteriaceae harbors many important pathogens, however it has proven difficult to reliably distinguish different members of this family or discern their interrelationships. To understand the interrelationships among the Enterobacteriaceae species, we have constructed two comprehensive phylogenetic trees for 78 genome-sequenced Enterobacteriaceae species based on 2487 core genome proteins, and another set of 118 conserved proteins. The genome sequences of Enterobacteriaceae species were also analyzed for genetic relatedness based on average amino acid identity and 16S rRNA sequence similarity. In parallel, comparative genomic studies on protein sequences from the Enterobacteriaceae have identified 88 molecular markers in the form of conserved signature indels (CSIs) that are uniquely shared by specific members of the family. All of these multiple lines of investigations provide consistent evidence that most of the species/genera within the family can be assigned to 6 different subfamily level clades which are designated as the "Escherichia clade", "Klebsiella clade", "Enterobacter clade", "Kosakonia clade", "Cronobacter clade" and "Cedecea clade". The members of the six described clades, in addition to their distinct branching in phylogenetic trees, can now be reliably demarcated in molecular terms on the basis of multiple identified CSIs that are exclusively shared by the group members. Several additional CSIs identified in this work that are either specific for individual genera (viz. Kosakonia, Kluyvera and Escherichia-Shigella), or are present at various taxonomic depths, offer information regarding the interrelationships among the different clades. The described molecular markers provide novel means for diagnostic as well as genetic and biochemical studies on the Enterobacteriaceae species and for resolving the polyphyly of its several genera viz. Escherichia, Enterobacter and Kluyvera. On the bases of our results, we are proposing the reclassification of Escherichia vulneris and Enterobacter massiliensis into two novel genera viz. Pseudescherichia gen. nov. and Metakosakonia gen. nov., respectively. Additionally, our results also support the transfer of "Enterobacter lignolyticus" and "Kluyvera intestini" to the genera Pluralibacter and Metakosakonia, respectively.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conserved signature indels; Enterobacteriaceae phylogeny; Enterobacteriaceae taxonomy; Molecular markers; Phylogenomics studies; Reclassification of Enterobacter and Escherichia species

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28658607     DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Genet Evol        ISSN: 1567-1348            Impact factor:   3.342


  30 in total

1.  Proposal for Unification of the Genus Metakosakonia and the Genus Phytobacter to a Single Genus Phytobacter and Reclassification of Metakosakonia massiliensis as Phytobacter massiliensis comb. nov.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Ma; Rong Yao; Yuanyuan Li; Xiuqin Wu; Shuying Li; Qianli An
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Comparative Genomics of the Genus Lactobacillus Reveals Robust Phylogroups That Provide the Basis for Reclassification.

Authors:  Elisa Salvetti; Hugh M B Harris; Giovanna E Felis; Paul W O'Toole
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  An Update on the Novel Genera and Species and Revised Taxonomic Status of Bacterial Organisms Described in 2016 and 2017.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Performance and Application of 16S rRNA Gene Cycle Sequencing for Routine Identification of Bacteria in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Deirdre L Church; Lorenzo Cerutti; Antoine Gürtler; Thomas Griener; Adrian Zelazny; Stefan Emler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  The population genetics of pathogenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Erick Denamur; Olivier Clermont; Stéphane Bonacorsi; David Gordon
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Phylogenomics and Comparative Genomic Studies Robustly Support Division of the Genus Mycobacterium into an Emended Genus Mycobacterium and Four Novel Genera.

Authors:  Radhey S Gupta; Brian Lo; Jeen Son
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published.

Authors:  Aharon Oren; George M Garrity
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Composition and Origin of the Fermentation Microbiota of Mahewu, a Zimbabwean Fermented Cereal Beverage.

Authors:  Felicitas Pswarayi; Michael G Gänzle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Jejubacter calystegiae gen. nov., sp. nov., moderately halophilic, a new member of the family Enterobacteriaceae, isolated from beach morning glory.

Authors:  Lingmin Jiang; Dexin Wang; Jung-Sook Lee; Dae-Hyuk Kim; Jae Cheol Jeong; Cha Young Kim; Suk Weon Kim; Jiyoung Lee
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.422

10.  Shigella Phages Isolated during a Dysentery Outbreak Reveal Uncommon Structures and Broad Species Diversity.

Authors:  Sarah M Doore; Jason R Schrad; William F Dean; John A Dover; Kristin N Parent
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.