Mackenzie R Wehner1, Kevin T Nead2, Eleni Linos3. 1. Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 3. Department of Dermatology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco.
Abstract
Importance: Population-level disease metrics are critical to guide the distribution of resources and implementation of public health initiatives. Internet search data reflect population interest in health topics and may be an alternative metric of disease characteristics when traditional sources are lacking, such as in basal and squamous cell carcinomas, which are not included in national cancer registries. However, these data are not yet well validated or understood. Objective: To evaluate whether state-specific normalized internet search volume correlates with incidence and mortality rates of common cancers in the United States, including melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional analysis of Google search volume index data and US cancer incidences and mortalities of 8 of the most incident cancers in the United States in 2009 to 2013, at the state level, per the National Program of Cancer Registries. Participants were people performing Google searches and patients diagnosed as having cancers reported to cancer registries. Main Outcomes and Measures: Correlation between Google search volumes, normalized to total Google search volume, and National Program of Cancer Registries recorded cancer incidence and mortality rates. Results: By state, relative Google search volume statistically significantly correlated with cancer incidence rates in 5 of 8 commonly diagnosed cancers in the United States (colon cancer: R = 0.61; P < .001; lung cancer: R = 0.73; P < .001; lymphoma: R = 0.51; P < .001; melanoma: R = 0.36; P = .01; and thyroid cancer: R = 0.30; P = .03). For 4 of those 5 cancers (colon cancer: R = 0.61; P < .001; lung cancer: R = 0.62; P < .001; lymphoma: R = 0.38; P = .006; and melanoma: R = 0.31; P = .03), relative Google search volume also correlated with mortality rates. Conclusions and Relevance: Population-level internet search behavior may be a valuable real-time tool to estimate cancer incidence and mortality rates, especially for cancers not included in national registries, such as basal and squamous cell carcinomas.
Importance: Population-level disease metrics are critical to guide the distribution of resources and implementation of public health initiatives. Internet search data reflect population interest in health topics and may be an alternative metric of disease characteristics when traditional sources are lacking, such as in basal and squamous cell carcinomas, which are not included in national cancer registries. However, these data are not yet well validated or understood. Objective: To evaluate whether state-specific normalized internet search volume correlates with incidence and mortality rates of common cancers in the United States, including melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional analysis of Google search volume index data and US cancer incidences and mortalities of 8 of the most incident cancers in the United States in 2009 to 2013, at the state level, per the National Program of Cancer Registries. Participants were people performing Google searches and patients diagnosed as having cancers reported to cancer registries. Main Outcomes and Measures: Correlation between Google search volumes, normalized to total Google search volume, and National Program of Cancer Registries recorded cancer incidence and mortality rates. Results: By state, relative Google search volume statistically significantly correlated with cancer incidence rates in 5 of 8 commonly diagnosed cancers in the United States (colon cancer: R = 0.61; P < .001; lung cancer: R = 0.73; P < .001; lymphoma: R = 0.51; P < .001; melanoma: R = 0.36; P = .01; and thyroid cancer: R = 0.30; P = .03). For 4 of those 5 cancers (colon cancer: R = 0.61; P < .001; lung cancer: R = 0.62; P < .001; lymphoma: R = 0.38; P = .006; and melanoma: R = 0.31; P = .03), relative Google search volume also correlated with mortality rates. Conclusions and Relevance: Population-level internet search behavior may be a valuable real-time tool to estimate cancer incidence and mortality rates, especially for cancers not included in national registries, such as basal and squamous cell carcinomas.
Authors: Charles A Phillips; Alaina Hunt; Mikaela Salvesen-Quinn; Jorge Guerra; Marilyn M Schapira; L Charles Bailey; Raina M Merchant Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Charles A Phillips; Allison Barz Leahy; Yimei Li; Marilyn M Schapira; L Charles Bailey; Raina M Merchant Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Stefanie Seidl; Barbara Schuster; Melvin Rüth; Tilo Biedermann; Alexander Zink Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Chenjie Xu; Yi Wang; Hongxi Yang; Jie Hou; Li Sun; Xinyu Zhang; Xinxi Cao; Yabing Hou; Lan Wang; Qiliang Cai; Yaogang Wang Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Cora Scheerer; Melvin Rüth; Linda Tizek; Martin Köberle; Tilo Biedermann; Alexander Zink Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 5.428