Literature DB >> 28658114

Correlation between polymorphism of vitamin D receptor TaqI and susceptibility to colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Shihou Sheng1, Yahong Chen, Zhen Shen.   

Abstract

The meta-analysis aimed to investigate the correlation between the polymorphism of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) TaqI and susceptibility of colorectal cancer.Studies were extracted from the electronic databases of PubMed and Embase. The balance of heredity was estimated by the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test, and heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran Q statistics and I test. Four assessed models, namely additive (t vs T), dominant (Tt + tt vs TT), recessive (tt vs Tt + TT), and codominant (Tt vs TT and tt vs TT), were used to evaluate the correlations and the effective results were measured as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).A total of 14 studies, including 4632 patients and 5086 controls, were enrolled in this meta-analysis. With no significant heterogeneities observed among the 4 models, the fixed-effect model was used to examine the pooled effect value. There were no significant differences among t vs T (OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94-1.09; P = .70), Tt + tt vs TT (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96-1.15; P = .32), tt vs Tt + TT (OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87-1.17; P = .92), Tt vs TT (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.93-1.13; P = .62), and tt vs TT (OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.85-1.17; P = .98) with respect to increasing CRC frequency.No evidence showed that TaqI polymorphisms were significantly associated with susceptibility to CRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28658114      PMCID: PMC5500036          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide in both men and women.[ It was estimated that there would be 95,270 new cases and 49,190 deaths in 2016.[ Although the incidence of and death owing to CRC decreased by 3% from 2003 to 2012 because of the popularization of a westernized lifestyle, CRC prevalence continues to increase in China.[ Family-based researches have identified multiple delirious germline mutations, such as MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6, BMPR1A, SMAD4, POLE, NTHL1, MUTYH, POLD1, and adenomatous polyposis coil (APC), that increase susceptibility to CRC.[ Although gene mutations account for <5% of all CRCs, it is accepted that combinations of these low-risk genes contribute to an increased risk for CRC.[ Vitamin D is a fat-soluble steroid hormone, which is obtained from the diet and is synthesized in the skin after exposure to ultraviolet light.[ During the synthesis process, vitamin D is converted to active 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D], which is involved in the administration of cell cycle and has been implicated in CRC development.[ The vitamin D receptor, encoded by VDR, is involved in the first step of 1,25(OH)2D signal transduction.[ Several studies have reported that VDR polymorphisms, including TaqI, BsmI, and Tru91, are associated with the susceptibility of CRC.[ Many studies have focused on the association between TaqI polymorphisms and CRC with conflicting results [; thus, the involvement of vitamin D in CRC pathogenesis remains unclear.[ To our knowledge, although several meta-analyses have been performed to clarify the association between VDR polymorphisms and CRC, only the BsmI polymorphism has been clearly confirmed as a risk factor for CRC; the role of TaqI remains unclear.[ Although Serrano et al[ have reported that TaqI is associated with a significantly increased risk for CRC. Touvier et al[ demonstrated no significant associations between TaqI and CRC, consistent with the findings of Xu et al.[ Therefore, to further investigate the correlation, in this meta-analysis, the associations between TaqI polymorphisms and CRC were assessed with updated publications to provide new insights regarding the CRC mechanism.

Materials and methods

Search strategy

The electronic databases of PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) were searched for English-language publications about the vitamin D receptor TaqI and CRC for all records listed up to December 18, 2016. Key search terms used were as follows: “genetic” (OR “polymorphism” OR “variant”) AND “colorectal cancer” (OR “colorectal neoplasm”) AND “vitamin D receptor” (OR “VDR”). The references of retrieved articles were also manually searched for further references.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Articles included in this meta-analysis had to meet the following criteria: research designed as a case-control study, the research subjects were humans, patients in case group had CRC, research focused on the correlation between TaqI and susceptibility to CRC, and gene numbers were provided or could be computed. Articles were excluded if they met any of the following criteria: publications were reviews, comments, or letters; studies included only were family members or relatives; allele frequencies were not according to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE); and studies focused on the correlation between TaqI polymorphism and CRC occurrence.

Data extracted and quality evaluation

Two authors independently screened the literatures based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. When the selected studies were confirmed, the data were extracted and summarized in tables, including data regarding the first author, publication year, geographical region where the study was conducted, age and sex of subjects, sample size of both case and control groups, source of control groups, and data of gene types. After extraction, the authors exchanged the tables, and disagreements were resolved by discussion. The quality of the included papers was estimated by the standard provided by Clark and Baudouin.[ For this measurement, 10 terms were included, and each with a score of 1. A final score of ≥6 was considered to indicate high quality, with lower scores indicating low quality.[

Statistical analysis

The HWE test for each study was performed using Stata version 11.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX), and P < .05 was considered to indicate significant disequilibrium. The codominant (Tt vs TT, tt vs TT), dominant (Tt + tt vs TT), recessive (tt vs Tt + TT), and additive (t vs T) were compared. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated. A heterogeneity test of the studies was conducted using Cochran Q statistics and I2 tests.[ When the Q statistic indicated a P < .05 and/or I2 > 50%, significant heterogeneity was considered to be presented, and the statistics were merged with a random-effect model; otherwise, the fixed-effect model was utilized. Sensitivity was assessed by the leave one-out method. OR with 95% CI and P values were used to report the effect size. OR values were calculated using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

Literature retrieval

Using the search items, we identified 127 articles in PubMed and 377 papers in Embase. Of the 504 articles, 444 were excluded as duplicates or not relevant. Of the remaining 60 articles, 43 studies were rejected, including 9 reviews, 3 not case-control studies, 15 not relevant to TaqI, 9 without gene frequency, and 7 on CRC incidence. The complete text of the remaining 17 articles was reviewed, and 3 articles were ruled out because of significant disequilibrium identified by the HWE test. Therefore, 14 articles were enrolled in this meta-analysis (Fig. 1).[
Figure 1

Flow chart of the selection of published articles included in the meta-analysis.

Flow chart of the selection of published articles included in the meta-analysis.

Characteristics of included studies

In this meta-analysis, 9718 subjects from 14 studies were reviewed, including 4632 subjects in case groups and 5086 in control groups (Table 1). Among the included studies, 4 were preformed among the Asians and 10 among the Caucasians. Among the control groups, half comprised healthy individuals and the other half included subjects without CRCs. No significant deviations of HWE were identified for allele frequencies in both the case and control groups. All included studies were published between 2004 and 2016 and were of high quality (Table 2).
Table 1

Characteristics of the included studies.

Table 2

Quality assessment of the included literatures.

Characteristics of the included studies. Quality assessment of the included literatures.

Correlation between TaqI polymorphisms and CRC

To investigate the correlation between TaqI polymorphisms and CRC, 4 models, namely additive (t vs T), dominant (Tt + tt vs TT), recessive (tt vs Tt + TT), and codominant (Tt vs TT and tt vs TT), were brought out (Figs. 2–6). Because there were no significant heterogeneities among the 4 models (I2 = 38%, P = .08; I2 = 27%, P = .16; I2 = 30%, P = .16; I2 = 0%, P = .45; and I2 = 35%, P = .11, respectively), the fixed-effect model was used to estimate the pooled effects. After evaluation, there were no significant differences among t vs T (OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94–1.09; P = .70), Tt + tt vs TT (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96–1.15; P = .32), tt vs Tt + TT (OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87–1.17; P = .92), Tt vs TT (OR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.93–1.13; P = .62), and tt vs TT (OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.85–1.17; P = .98) with respect to increasing CRC frequency of CRC. Sensitivity testing showed that the pooled result could not be reversed by leave-one-out method (Table 3).
Figure 2

Forest plot to estimate the effect of the TaqI polymorphism on colorectal cancer in the additive model (t vs T).

Figure 6

Forest plot to estimate the effect of the TaqI polymorphism on colorectal cancer in codominant model (tt vs TT).

Table 3

Sensitivity assessed by the leave-one-out method.

Forest plot to estimate the effect of the TaqI polymorphism on colorectal cancer in the additive model (t vs T). Forest plot to estimate the effect of the TaqI polymorphism on colorectal cancer in the dominant model (Tt + tt vs TT). Forest plot to estimate the effect of the TaqI polymorphism on colorectal cancer in the recessive model (tt vs Tt + TT). Forest plot to estimate the effect of the TaqI polymorphism on colorectal cancer in the codominant model (Tt vs TT). Forest plot to estimate the effect of the TaqI polymorphism on colorectal cancer in codominant model (tt vs TT). Sensitivity assessed by the leave-one-out method. Subgroup analyses based on ethnicity and control group composition were also performed. However, no statistically significant relevance was identified between TaqI polymorphisms and CRC (Table 4). Finally, publication bias was also examined, and no obvious bias was identified in the funnel plot (Fig. 7).
Table 4

Outcomes of subgroup analyses.

Figure 7

Funnel plot to estimate the publication bias of enrolled studies.

Outcomes of subgroup analyses. Funnel plot to estimate the publication bias of enrolled studies.

Discussion

In this meta-analysis, 14 investigations involving 9718 subjects were evaluated. With no obvious heterogeneities, the fixed-effect model was used to estimate the pooled effects, and no significant differences were among t vs T, Tt + tt vs TT, tt vs Tt + TT, Tt vs TT, and tt vs TT with respect to increasing CRC frequency. There were also no remarkable correlations detected between TaqI polymorphisms and CRC in the ethnicity or control subgroup analyses. VDR, which codes a type II nuclear receptor, is located on the chromosome 12q12-q14, with 6 polymorphic sites described.[TaqI is one of these sites located in the 3′UTR of VDR that has been considered to be a risk factor for CRC.[ Atoum and Tchoporyan[ have reported that Jordanians with TaqI TT and Tt genotypes had an increased CRC risk, and Yaylim-Elaltan et al[ indicate that a VDR gene with TTFf or TtFf genotypes appears to be protective against CRC. However, studies in New Zealand[ and Saudi Arabian[ found no evidences, suggesting that the TaqI polymorphisms correlated with susceptibility to CRC. Meta-analyses that included studies of TaqI polymorphism have also reached conflicting conclusions.[ Our meta-analysis included 5 new and stricter criteria. Although the population size in our meta-analysis was larger than that in previous meta-analyses and the quality of included studies were good, no significant association was found between TaqI polymorphisms and susceptibility to CRC. This indicated that different TaqI gene types likely have no significant effect on CRC occurrence. CRC is a result of the interaction of various risk factors such as age, lifestyle, physical activity, and genetic and ethnic backgrounds. Thus, we conducted subgroup analyses based on ethnicity and the types of control groups. However, no significant correlation was identified between the TaqI polymorphisms and susceptibility to CRC. Considering the absence of such subgroup analysis in previous meta-analyses,[ whether ethnicity correlates with the CRC incidence still needs to be further investigated. However, it does seem clear that regardless of the comparison with control groups of healthy people or those with diseases other than CRC, the TaqI polymorphisms are not correlated with susceptibility to CRC. This meta-analysis had some limitations. Despite the large sample size, the percentage of Asians was still limited; therefore, results from the subgroup analysis of ethnicity may not be robust. Further high-quality research among Asians is required to verify our findings. In addition, because of incomplete information regarding sex, age, and other factors, subgroup analyses of these factors are still required. However, despite these limitations, the results of this meta-analysis provide knowledge regarding the lack of association between TaqI polymorphism and susceptibility to CRC. In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates the absence of an obvious correlation between TaqI polymorphisms and susceptibility to CRC. Further high-quality research is required to address questions of factors affecting the results among various subgroups.
  34 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis on vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and cancer risk.

Authors:  Yeqiong Xu; Bangshun He; Yuqin Pan; Qiwen Deng; Huiling Sun; Rui Li; Tianyi Gao; Guoqi Song; Shukui Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-01-10

Review 2.  Vitamin D and colon cancer.

Authors:  Fábio Pereira; María Jesús Larriba; Alberto Muñoz
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 3.  Candidate gene studies in gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kshitij Srivastava; Anvesha Srivastava; Kiran Lata Sharma; Balraj Mittal
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Variation in the vitamin D receptor gene is not associated with risk of colorectal cancer in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  David J Hughes; Ivona Hlavatá; Pavel Soucek; Barbara Pardini; Alessio Naccarati; Ludmila Vodickova; Mazda Jenab; Pavel Vodicka
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2011-09

5.  Meta-analyses of vitamin D intake, 25-hydroxyvitamin D status, vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, and colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Mathilde Touvier; Doris S M Chan; Rosa Lau; Dagfinn Aune; Rui Vieira; Darren C Greenwood; Ellen Kampman; Elio Riboli; Serge Hercberg; Teresa Norat
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism with prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia in a Japanese population.

Authors:  T Habuchi; T Suzuki; R Sasaki; L Wang; K Sato; S Satoh; T Akao; N Tsuchiya; N Shimoda; Y Wada; A Koizumi; J Chihara; O Ogawa; T Kato
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Cancer statistics, 2016.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Association between circulating vitamin D, the Taq1 vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk among Jordanians.

Authors:  Manar Fayiz Atoum; Melya Nizar Tchoporyan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

9.  Vitamin D and cancer.

Authors:  Laura Vuolo; Carolina Di Somma; Antongiulio Faggiano; Annamaria Colao
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Association of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms with Colorectal Cancer in a Saudi Arabian Population.

Authors:  Khayal A Alkhayal; Zainab H Awadalia; Mansoor-Ali Vaali-Mohammed; Omar A Al Obeed; Alanoud Al Wesaimer; Rabih Halwani; Ahmed M Zubaidi; Zahid Khan; Maha-Hamadien Abdulla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Precision Nutrition for Targeting Lipid Metabolism in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Aguirre-Portolés; Lara P Fernández; Ana Ramírez de Molina
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 2.  Extra-Skeletal Effects of Vitamin D.

Authors:  Rose Marino; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  MicroRNA-binding site polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Morteza Gholami; Bagher Larijani; Farshad Sharifi; Shirin Hasani-Ranjbar; Reza Taslimi; Milad Bastami; Rasha Atlasi; Mahsa M Amoli
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Vitamin D receptor ApaI polymorphism associated with progression of liver disease in Vietnamese patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus.

Authors:  Nghiem Xuan Hoan; Nguyen Khuyen; Dao Phuong Giang; Mai Thanh Binh; Nguyen Linh Toan; Do Tuan Anh; Ngo Tat Trung; Mai Hong Bang; Christian G Meyer; Thirumalaisamy P Velavan; Le Huu Song
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.103

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.