Literature DB >> 28658043

Impact of Cervical Spine Deformity on Preoperative Disease Severity and Postoperative Outcomes Following Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Sub-analysis of AOSpine North America and International Studies.

So Kato1,2,3, Aria Nouri1, Dongjin Wu1,2,3, Satoshi Nori1,3, Lindsay Tetreault1, Michael G Fehlings1,3.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Sub-analysis of the prospective AOSpine CSM North America and International studies.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of cervical spine deformity on pre- and postoperative outcomes in fusion surgeries for degenerative cervical myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The associations between cervical alignment and patient outcomes have been reported but are not well established in a myelopathy cohort. The impact of deformity correction in this population also needs to be elucidated.
METHODS: A total of 757 patients were enrolled in two prospective international multicenter AOSpine studies. Among those who underwent anterior or posterior fusion surgeries, pre- and 1-year postoperative upright neutral lateral radiographs of cervical spine were investigated to measure C2-7 Cobb angle and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Patient outcome measures included the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score for myelopathy severity, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Short-form 36 (SF-36). These scores were compared between patients with and without cervical deformity, which was defined as C2-7 Cobb >10° kyphosis and/or SVA >40 mm.
RESULTS: A total of 178 patients were included with complete pre- and postoperative radiographs. SVA significantly increased postoperatively (27.4 vs. 30.7 mm, P = 0.004). All outcome measurement showed significant improvements above minimal clinically important differences. 23.6% of the patients had cervical deformity preoperatively; preoperative deformity was associated with worse preoperative NDI scores (45.7 vs. 38.9, P = 0.04). Postoperatively, those with deformity exhibited significantly lower SF-36 physical component scores (37.2 vs. 41.4, P = 0.048). However, when focusing on the preoperatively deformed cohort, we did not find any significant differences in the postoperative outcome scores between those with and without residual deformity.
CONCLUSION: There was a significant association between cervical deformity and both preoperative disease severity and postoperative outcomes; however, no impact of deformity correction was shown. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28658043     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evaluating Cervical Sagittal Alignment in Cervical Myelopathy: Are Sitting Cervical Radiographs and Standing Whole-Spine Radiographs Equally Useful?

Authors:  Yasuhiko Morimoto; Hideki Shigematsu; Eiichiro Iwata; Masato Tanaka; Akinori Okuda; Keisuke Masuda; Yusuke Yamamoto; Toshichika Takeshima; Yoshiyuki Nakagawa; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-11-15

3.  Surgical treatment outcome on a national cohort of 176 patients with cervical manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Anna MacDowall; Laszlo Barany; Gergely Bodon
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-09-08

4.  What are the major drivers of outcomes in cervical deformity surgery?

Authors:  Peter Gust Passias; Katherine E Pierce; Brandon Passano; Muhammad B Tariq; Salman Ahmad; Vivek Singh; Stephane Owusu-Sarpong; Oscar Krol; Bailey Imbo; Lara Passfall; Peter Tretiakov; Tyler Williamson; Rachel Joujon-Roche; Waleed Ahmad; Sara Naessig; Bassel Diebo
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-12-11

5.  What are the major drivers of outcomes in cervical deformity surgery?

Authors:  Peter Gust Passias; Katherine E Pierce; Bailey Imbo; Oscar Krol; Lara Passfall; Peter Tretiakov; Kevin Moattari; Tyler Williamson; Rachel Joujon-Roche; Brandon Passano; Waleed Ahmad; Sara Naessig; Bassel Diebo
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-12-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.