Literature DB >> 28657524

A LITERATURE REVIEW AND NEW DATA SUPPORTING AN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT OF LETTER-BY-LETTER READING.

Marlene Behrmann, David C Plaut, James Nelson.   

Abstract

We present a theoretical account of letter-by-letter reading (LBL) that reconciles discrepant findings associated with this form of acquired dyslexia. We claim that LBL reading is caused by a deficit that affects the normal activation of the orthographic representation of the stimulus. In spite of this lower-level deficit, the degraded orthographic information may be processed further, and lexical, semantic, and higher-order orthographic information may still influence the reading patterns ofthese patients.In supportof our position, w e present a review of 57 published cases of LBL reading in w hich w e demonstrate that a peripheral deficit was evident in almost all of the patients and that, simultaneously, strong effects oflexical/ semantic variables were observed on reading performance. We then go on to report findings from an empirical analysis of seven LBL readers in whom w e document the joint effects of lexical variables (word frequency and im ageability) and word length on naming latency. We argue that the reading perform ance of these patients reflects the residual functioning of the same interactive system that supported normal reading premorbidly.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 28657524     DOI: 10.1080/026432998381212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

Review 1.  In your right mind: right hemisphere contributions to language processing and production.

Authors:  Annukka K Lindell
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  The visual word form system in context.

Authors:  Zoe V J Woodhead; Sonia L E Brownsett; Novraj S Dhanjal; Christian Beckmann; Richard J S Wise
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Reading therapy strengthens top-down connectivity in patients with pure alexia.

Authors:  Zoe V J Woodhead; William Penny; Gareth R Barnes; Hilary Crewes; Richard J S Wise; Cathy J Price; Alexander P Leff
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Don't words come easy? A psychophysical exploration of word superiority.

Authors:  Randi Starrfelt; Anders Petersen; Signe Vangkilde
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between crowding and reading: A neurodegenerative approach.

Authors:  Keir Yong; Kishan Rajdev; Elizabeth Warrington; Jennifer Nicholas; Jason Warren; Sebastian Crutch
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Processing deficits for familiar and novel faces in patients with left posterior fusiform lesions.

Authors:  Daniel J Roberts; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Esther Kim; Marie-Josephe Tainturier; Pelagie M Beeson; Steven Z Rapcsak; Anna M Woollams
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Efficient visual object and word recognition relies on high spatial frequency coding in the left posterior fusiform gyrus: evidence from a case-series of patients with ventral occipito-temporal cortex damage.

Authors:  Daniel J Roberts; Anna M Woollams; Esther Kim; Pelagie M Beeson; Steven Z Rapcsak; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Intact reading in patients with profound early visual dysfunction.

Authors:  Keir X X Yong; Jason D Warren; Elizabeth K Warrington; Sebastian J Crutch
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  What lies beneath: a comparison of reading aloud in pure alexia and semantic dementia.

Authors:  Anna M Woollams; Paul Hoffman; Daniel J Roberts; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Karalyn E Patterson
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.