| Literature DB >> 28657223 |
Ayami Inoue1, Ken Yamaguchi2, Yasuhisa Kurata3, Ryusuke Murakami1, Kaoru Abiko1, Junzo Hamanishi1, Eiji Kondoh1, Tsukasa Baba1, Aki Kido3, Ikuo Konishi1,4, Noriomi Matsumura1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Carcinosarcoma of the uterine corpus has a poor prognosis. Although pathological necrosis is a prognostic factor of endometrial cancer, the clinicopathological influences of an unenhanced region observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are inconclusive. The aim of our study was to determine the clinicobiological impact of the presence of an unenhanced region on MRI, which can represent necrosis, in uterine carcinosarcoma.Entities:
Keywords: Carcinosarcoma; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Necrosis; Uterine Neoplasms
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28657223 PMCID: PMC5540721 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e62
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gynecol Oncol ISSN: 2005-0380 Impact factor: 4.401
Fig. 1Contrast-enhanced MRI, macroscopic view, and histological specimen. (A) Sagittal image and (B) axial image showing a small unenhanced area ([A] pink line, [B] yellow line) in the tumor ([A] light blue line, [B] blue line). The average percentage of the tumor that is unenhanced is 9.6%. (C) Macroscopic view of the resected specimen demonstrating a large exophytic mass. Necrosis is seen in the center of the tumor. (D) Distinctive slice of the specimen, including a necrotic area. (E) Microscopic findings showing the presence of a necrotic area adjacent to a viable area and (F) viable tumor cells.
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Correspondence of unenhanced regions on MRI with pathological necrosis (n=21)
| Variables | Necrosis | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present | Absent | |||
| Unenhanced region | Present | 14 | 2 | 0.011* |
| Absent | 1 | 4 | ||
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
*p<0.050.
Fig. 2OS rate of uterine carcinosarcoma patients based on the presence of pathological necrosis (A) and more than 10% of the tumor being unenhanced on MRI (B). OS rate (C) and PFS rate (D) according to FIGO stage.
FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Prognostic impact of clinical pathological factors using the log-rank test
| Variables | Subsets | No. | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFS | OS | |||
| FIGO stage | I–II | 18 | 0.013* | 0.022* |
| III–IV | 11 | |||
| Carcinomatous component | Endometrioid | 12 | 0.504 | 0.263 |
| Others | 16 | |||
| Carcinoma grade | G1–2 | 7 | 0.003* | 0.021* |
| G3 | 21 | |||
| Sarcomatous component | Homologous | 17 | 0.181 | 0.117 |
| Heterologous | 10 | |||
| Tumor size (cm) | <7 | 13 | 0.046* | 0.128 |
| ≥7 | 15 | |||
| Myometrial invasion | ≤1/2 | 15 | 0.174 | 0.596 |
| >1/2 | 13 | |||
| LVSI | Yes | 12 | 0.600 | 0.825 |
| No | 16 | |||
| Ascites assessment | Positive | 8 | 0.029* | 0.042* |
| Negative | 19 | |||
| LN metastasis | Positive | 4 | <0.001* | 0.002* |
| Negative | 21 | |||
| Pathological necrosis | Present | 15 | 0.672 | 0.704 |
| Absent | 6 | |||
| MRI unenhanced region (%) | <10 | 9 | 0.143 | 0.019* |
| ≥10 | 13 | |||
Endometrioid, endometrioid adenocarcinoma; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; LN, lymph node; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
*p<0.050.
Fig. 3Ratio of unenhanced regions on MRI is positively correlated with tumor size (A) and clinical stage (B).
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Univariate and multivariate analyses for OS rate using Cox regression model
| Variables | Subsets | No. | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | p-value | HR | 95% CI | p-value | |||
| FIGO stage | I–II | 13 | 3.64 | 0.91–14.61 | 0.068 | - | - | - |
| III–IV | 9 | |||||||
| Carcinoma grade | G1–2 | 4 | 31.78 | 0.46–22,008.54 | 0.300 | - | - | - |
| G3 | 18 | |||||||
| Sarcomatous component | Homologous | 13 | 2.05 | 0.55–7.64 | 0.288 | - | - | - |
| Heterologous | 8 | |||||||
| Tumor size (cm) | <7 | 10 | 2.14 | 0.53–8.67 | 0.285 | - | - | - |
| ≥7 | 12 | |||||||
| Myometrial invasion | ≤1/2 | 13 | 1.52 | 0.41–5.78 | 0.518 | - | - | - |
| >1/2 | 9 | |||||||
| LVSI | Absence | 12 | 0.78 | 0.21–2.95 | 0.719 | - | - | - |
| Presence | 10 | |||||||
| Ascites | Negative | 15 | 3.28 | 0.81–13.28 | 0.097 | - | - | - |
| Positive | 6 | |||||||
| LN metastasis | Absence | 16 | 6.38 | 1.38–29.48 | 0.018* | 3.761 | 0.79–17.91 | 0.096 |
| Presence | 4 | |||||||
| MRI unenhanced region (%) | <10 | 9 | 8.29 | 1.03–67.11 | 0.047* | 5.381 | 0.60–47.95 | 0.312 |
| ≥10 | 13 | |||||||
CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; HR, hazard ratio; LN, lymph node; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; OS, overall survival.
*p<0.050.