Literature DB >> 28657150

Improving power for rare-variant tests by integrating external controls.

Seunggeun Lee1,2, Sehee Kim1, Christian Fuchsberger1,2,3.   

Abstract

Due to the drop in sequencing cost, the number of sequenced genomes is increasing rapidly. To improve power of rare-variant tests, these sequenced samples could be used as external control samples in addition to control samples from the study itself. However, when using external controls, possible batch effects due to the use of different sequencing platforms or genotype calling pipelines can dramatically increase type I error rates. To address this, we propose novel summary statistics based single and gene- or region-based rare-variant tests that allow the integration of external controls while controlling for type I error. Our approach is based on the insight that batch effects on a given variant can be assessed by comparing odds ratio estimates using internal controls only vs. using combined control samples of internal and external controls. From simulation experiments and the analysis of data from age-related macular degeneration and type 2 diabetes studies, we demonstrate that our method can substantially improve power while controlling for type I error rate.
© 2017 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rare-variant test; external controls; next-generation sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28657150      PMCID: PMC6082405          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  25 in total

1.  Optimal tests for rare variant effects in sequencing association studies.

Authors:  Seunggeun Lee; Michael C Wu; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Calibrating a coalescent simulation of human genome sequence variation.

Authors:  Stephen F Schaffner; Catherine Foo; Stacey Gabriel; David Reich; Mark J Daly; David Altshuler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  General framework for meta-analysis of rare variants in sequencing association studies.

Authors:  Seunggeun Lee; Tanya M Teslovich; Michael Boehnke; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Association analysis using next-generation sequence data from publicly available control groups: the robust variance score statistic.

Authors:  Andriy Derkach; Theodore Chiang; Jiafen Gong; Laura Addis; Sara Dobbins; Ian Tomlinson; Richard Houlston; Deb K Pal; Lisa J Strug
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers.

Authors:  Michael A Quail; Miriam Smith; Paul Coupland; Thomas D Otto; Simon R Harris; Thomas R Connor; Anna Bertoni; Harold P Swerdlow; Yong Gu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Testing Rare-Variant Association without Calling Genotypes Allows for Systematic Differences in Sequencing between Cases and Controls.

Authors:  Yi-Juan Hu; Peizhou Liao; H Richard Johnston; Andrew S Allen; Glen A Satten
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  A groupwise association test for rare mutations using a weighted sum statistic.

Authors:  Bo Eskerod Madsen; Sharon R Browning
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  An evaluation of statistical approaches to rare variant analysis in genetic association studies.

Authors:  Andrew P Morris; Eleftheria Zeggini
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  NCBI's Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes: dbGaP.

Authors:  Kimberly A Tryka; Luning Hao; Anne Sturcke; Yumi Jin; Zhen Y Wang; Lora Ziyabari; Moira Lee; Natalia Popova; Nataliya Sharopova; Masato Kimura; Michael Feolo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  9 in total

1.  Analysis in case-control sequencing association studies with different sequencing depths.

Authors:  Sixing Chen; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  Complex-Trait Prediction in the Era of Big Data.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; Ana Ines Vazquez; Stephen Hsu; Louis Lello
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Association of Breast and Ovarian Cancers With Predisposition Genes Identified by Large-Scale Sequencing.

Authors:  Hsiao-Mei Lu; Shuwei Li; Mary Helen Black; Shela Lee; Robert Hoiness; Sitao Wu; Wenbo Mu; Robert Huether; Jefferey Chen; Srijani Sridhar; Yuan Tian; Rachel McFarland; Jill Dolinsky; Brigette Tippin Davis; Sharon Mexal; Charles Dunlop; Aaron Elliott
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 4.  Opportunities and challenges for the use of common controls in sequencing studies.

Authors:  Genevieve L Wojcik; Jessica Murphy; Jacob L Edelson; Christopher R Gignoux; Alexander G Ioannidis; Alisa Manning; Manuel A Rivas; Steven Buyske; Audrey E Hendricks
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 59.581

5.  Integrating external controls in case-control studies improves power for rare-variant tests.

Authors:  Yatong Li; Seunggeun Lee
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Summix: A method for detecting and adjusting for population structure in genetic summary data.

Authors:  Ian S Arriaga-MacKenzie; Gregory Matesi; Samuel Chen; Alexandria Ronco; Katie M Marker; Jordan R Hall; Ryan Scherenberg; Mobin Khajeh-Sharafabadi; Yinfei Wu; Christopher R Gignoux; Megan Null; Audrey E Hendricks
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A data harmonization pipeline to leverage external controls and boost power in GWAS.

Authors:  Danfeng Chen; Katherine Tashman; Duncan S Palmer; Benjamin Neale; Kathryn Roeder; Alex Bloemendal; Claire Churchhouse; Zheng Tracy Ke
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.121

8.  Novel score test to increase power in association test by integrating external controls.

Authors:  Yatong Li; Seunggeun Lee
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  ProxECAT: Proxy External Controls Association Test. A new case-control gene region association test using allele frequencies from public controls.

Authors:  Audrey E Hendricks; Stephen C Billups; Hamish N C Pike; I Sadaf Farooqi; Eleftheria Zeggini; Stephanie A Santorico; Inês Barroso; Josée Dupuis
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.917

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.