Literature DB >> 28656638

New York State Breast Density Mandate: Follow-up Data With Screening Sonography.

Stamatia Destounis1, Andrea Arieno1, Renee Morgan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact on breast cancer detection from screening breast sonography performed in women with mammographically dense breasts.
METHODS: This study used a retrospective chart review. Data collected included total number of screening mammograms, total number of dense breast screening sonograms, total number of procedures performed, biopsy results, and demographic data. Data were obtained from January 1, 2013, through August 31, 2015. During this period, there were a total of 195,982 screening mammographic examinations performed at our facility. Of these, 83,234 patients (42.5%) were informed that their breast tissue was heterogeneously dense or extremely dense. We specifically reviewed cases to identify those with findings on sonography only. The positive predictive value, biopsy rate, and cancer detection rate were determined.
RESULTS: During the study period, 5434 screening sonographic examinations were performed in 4898 women with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts. Most (95.7%) of the sonographic examinations resulted in an American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 1 or 2 designation. A total of 101 lesions were given a BI-RADS 3 designation; 134 suspicious findings were given a BI-RADS 4 or 5 designation; and 100 of these were seen on sonography only, all of which underwent tissue sampling, resulting in the diagnosis of 18 malignancies; all were invasive. In evaluating screening sonographic findings, we found a positive predictive value of 18.0%, with an overall biopsy rate of 2.0% and a cancer detection rate of 3.3 per 1000.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our continued evaluation of our screening sonography program confirm that screening breast sonography in women with dense breast tissue can detect otherwise occult malignancy, with a low biopsy rate.
© 2017 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast density; breast imaging; breast ultrasound; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28656638     DOI: 10.1002/jum.14294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  6 in total

Review 1.  BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2021-08-15

2.  Between-Race Differences in Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Before and After Breast Density Notification Law.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Terrance L Albrecht; Suzanne O'Neill; Kristen Purrington
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matejka Rebolj; Valentina Assi; Adam Brentnall; Dharmishta Parmar; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Hsin Yuan; Hui-Chen Hsu; Ying-Yuan Chen; Chia-Hung Wu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  BI-RADS 3: Current and Future Use of Probably Benign.

Authors:  Karen A Lee; Nishi Talati; Rebecca Oudsema; Sharon Steinberger; Laurie R Margolies
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2018-01-27

Review 6.  The Role of Ultrasound in Screening Dense Breasts-A Review of the Literature and Practical Solutions for Implementation.

Authors:  Denise Thigpen; Amanda Kappler; Rachel Brem
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.