| Literature DB >> 28656474 |
S M Dietz1, D van Stijn2, D Burgner3,4,5, M Levin6, I M Kuipers7, B A Hutten8, T W Kuijpers2.
Abstract
Kawasaki disease (KD) is a pediatric vasculitis with coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) as its main complication. The diagnosis is based on the presence of persistent fever and clinical features including exanthema, lymphadenopathy, conjunctival injection, and changes to the mucosae and extremities. Although the etiology remains unknown, the current consensus is that it is likely caused by an (infectious) trigger initiating an abnormal immune response in genetically predisposed children. Treatment consists of high dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and is directed at preventing the development of CAA. Unfortunately, 10-20% of all patients fail to respond to IVIG and these children need additional anti-inflammatory treatment. Coronary artery lesions are diagnosed by echocardiography in the acute and subacute phases. Both absolute arterial diameters and z-scores, adjusted for height and weight, are used as criteria for CAA. Close monitoring of CAA is important as ischemic symptoms or myocardial infarction due to thrombosis or stenosis can occur. These complications are most likely to arise in the largest, so-called giant CAA. Apart from the presence of CAA, it is unclear whether KD causes an increased cardiovascular risk due to the vasculitis itself.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary artery aneurysms; Genetics; Intravenous immunoglobulins; Kawasaki disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28656474 PMCID: PMC5511310 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-017-2937-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Pediatr ISSN: 0340-6199 Impact factor: 3.183
Candidate genes and pathways associated with disease susceptibility, CAA development, and IVIG resistance
| Candidate pathway | Ethnicity | Reference | Included cases/controls | Susceptibility to KD (gene) | Susceptibility to CAA (gene) | Susceptibility to IVIG resistance (gene) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| European descent (case-control), Australia, NL, USA, UK (family based) | Khor et al. [ | 26 pedigrees, case-control = 119/225, family based = 1093 cases, 1621 parents, 198 siblings | Yes ( | x | x |
|
| Australia, US, UK (family based) and Dutch Caucasian (case-control) | Breunis et al. [ | 462 complete trios, case control: 123/171 | Yes ( | Yes ( | x |
| Intergenic region | Japanese | Onouchi et al. [ | 428/3379 | Yes ( | x | x |
| Onouchi et al. [ | 470/378 | “ | x | x | ||
| Onouchi et al. [ | 284/569 | x | x | |||
| (Han) Chinese | Yan et al. [ | 358/815 | Yes ( | No | x | |
| Taiwanese | Lee et al. [ | 622/1107a | Yes ( | x | x | |
| Lee et al. [ | 261/550 | “ | x | x | ||
| Lou et al. [ | 428/493 | Nominal association ( | x | |||
| Korean | Chang et al. [ | 186/600b | Yes ( | x | x | |
| Chang et al. [ | 288/498 | “ | x | x | ||
| US (European, Asian, Hispanic, Mixed, African American, Native American, Samoan). | Onouchi et al. [ | 503 trios | Yes ( | x | x | |
| European | Chang et al. [ | 405/6252 | Yes ( | x | x | |
|
| Japanese | Onouchi et al. [ | 427/476 | No | Yes ( | x |
| Onouchi et al. [ | 428/3379d | Yes ( | x | x | ||
| Onouchi et al. [ | 470/378 | “ | x | x | ||
| Onouchi et al. [ | 284/569 | “ | x | x | ||
| Han Chinese | Kuo et al. [ | 428/493 | Yes ( | Yes ( | x | |
| Lou et al. [ | 381/569 | Nominal association ( | x | x | ||
| Taiwanese | Lee et al. [ | 622/1107a | Yes ( | x | x | |
| Lee et al. [ | 261/550 | “ | x | x | ||
| European | Shendre et al. [ | 112 complete trios | Yes ( | x | x | |
|
| Japanese | Taniuchi et al. [ | 65/566 | Yes ( | Yes ( | x |
| Onouchi et al. [ | 428/3379e | Yes ( | x | x | ||
| Onouchi et al. [ | 470/378 | “ | x | x | ||
| Onouchi et al. [ | 284/569 | “ | x | x | ||
| (Han) Chinese | Duan et al. [ | 428/493 | Yes ( | No | x | |
| Yan et al. [ | 358/815 | Yes ( | No | No | ||
| Khor et al. [ | 130/568 | Yes ( | x | x | ||
| Taiwanese | Khor et al. [ | 438/446 | Yes ( | x | x | |
| Caucasian | Shrestha et al. [ | 176/369 | x | x | Yes ( | |
| Shrestha et al. [ | 156 trios, 75 single parent-child | Yes ( | Yes ( | Yes ( | ||
| European | Khor et al. [ | 405/6252g | Yes ( | x | x | |
| ITPKC | Japanese | Onouchi et al. [ | 94h | Yes ( | Yes ( | x |
| Onouchi et al. [ | 276/282 | “ | “ | x | ||
| Onouchi et al. [ | 267/752 | “ | “ | x | ||
| Onouchi et al. [ | 546/947 | Yes ( | Yes ( | Yes ( | ||
| Chinese | Peng et al. [ | 223/318 | Yes ( | Yes (ITPKC) | No | |
| Khor et al. [ | 130/568 | Yes ( | x | x | ||
| Taiwanese | Chi et al. [ | 385 (of which 158 trios)/1158 | No | No | x | |
| Lin et al. [ | 280/492 | Yes ( | No | x | ||
| Kuo et al. [ | 341/1190 | Yes ( | Yes ( | No | ||
| Above-mentioned studies combined | 999/2781 | Yes ( | x | x | ||
| Kuo et al. [ | 381/569 | Nok | Yes ( | x | ||
| Khor et al. [ | 438/446 | Yes ( | x | x | ||
| European | Khor et al. [ | 405/6252 (10) | Yes ( | x | x | |
| Khor et al. [ | 605 trios, 139 siblingsl | “ | x | x | ||
| US | Onouchi et al. [ | 209 trios | Yes ( | Yes ( | Yes ( | |
| TGF-β pathway | Japanese | Cho et al. [ | 105/303 | Yes ( | No | x |
| Han Chinese | Peng et al. [ | 392/421 | Yes ( | Yes ( | No | |
| Taiwanese | Kuo et al. [ | 381/569 | Yes ( | No | No | |
| Korean | Choi et al. [ | 105/500 | Yes ( | Yes ( | x | |
| European descent | Shimizu et al. [ | 128/159 | Yes | x | x | |
| Shimizu et al. [ | 451 trios | ( | x | x | ||
| Shimizu et al. [ | 435 | x | Yesn | x | ||
| Shimizu et al. [ | 237 | x | Yesn | Yes ( | ||
|
| Japanese | Kariyazono et al. [ | 103/144 | x | Yes ( | x |
| Taiwanese | Hsueh et al. [ | 93/96 | Yes ( | x | x | |
| Australia, US, UK (family based), Dutch Caucasian (case-control) | Breunis et al. [ | 462 complete trios, case control: 123/171 | Yes ( | Yes ( | x | |
| Dutch Caucasian | Breunis et al. [ | 170/300 | Yes ( | No | x |
ABCC4 ATP-binding cassette, subfamily C, member 4, ANGPT angiopoetin, CAA coronary artery aneurysm, FCGR Fc gamma receptor, GWAS genome-wide association study, ITPKC inositol-triphosphate kinase C, IVIG intravenous immunoglobulin, KD Kawasaki disease, NL Netherlands, SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, TGF-β transforming growth factor beta, UK United Kingdom, US United States, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor
aNumbers after quality control, starting numbers: 627/1118
bNumbers after quality control, starting numbers: 222/600
cSignificant difference between male patients with CAA (n = 58) compared with male patients without CAA (n = 195) and with controls, not in female patients
drs4810485 has protective effects for CAL formation in KD patients
eNumbers after quality control, starting numbers: 447/3397
fOnly significant taken in all ethnic groups (White and Asian combined)
gNumbers after quality control, starting numbers: 576/7464 cases/controls
hITPKC SNP not genotyped in 564 controls of first cohort
iA two-locus model in combination with a SNP in CASP3 was also significantly association with both CAA development and IVIG resistance
jCAA of >4 mm or in children over 5 years of age, diameter of at least 1.5 times adjacent segment
kTwo SNPs found but significance disappeared after correction for multiple testing
lTotal included trios in study = 740 which 135 of non-European descent, combined analyses
mOnly one SNP remained significant after Bonferroni correction
nDifferent SNPs found in different cohorts but many of the SNPs colocalized to the first intron of each of the three genes (TGFB2, TGFBR2, and SMAD3)
Fig. 1The role of IP3 and ITPKC in calcium signaling. (a) ITPKC phosphorylates IP3 to IP4 and modulates the abundance of IP3 and influences the calcium signaling. (b) Nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) are regulated by calcium signaling and enter the nucleus when dephosphorylated, there it activates cytokine transcription namely IL-2, IFNγ in T cells and Pro-IL1, IL-10, Pro-IL18 in macrophages. Footnote: Inositol triphosphate receptor (IP3R) forms a bridge between the endoplasmatic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria creating a site of contact between the ER and mitochondria called the mitochondria-associated ER membrane (MAM). NLRP3 is an inflammasome that forms at or close to the MAM upon cellular activation and ER stress and plays a pivotal role (by activating caspase-1) in the cleavage of pro-IL1b into IL1b and its subsequent secretion. The ER releases calcium into the cytosol and into mitochondria through (a.o.) the IP3R, which is a calcium channel, to which IP3 as an agonist binds to induce calcium release. IP3R binds via glucose-regulated protein 75 (GRP75) with the mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1) which may cause mitochondrial stress and leakage off reactive oxygen species (ROS), both important for inflammasome activation. Macrophages activate via their Toll-like receptors (TLRs) or G-protein coupled receptors several signaling pathways, that result in IP3 formation, NF-kB activation, and/or ER stress.
Fig. 2Imaging techniques used for Kawasaki disease. a, b, d, e display coronaries of the same patient with different imaging techniques. a Curved multi-planar reformat of the coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) scan shows an aneurysm of the right coronary artery. b A giant aneurysm of the left anterior descending artery. c A normal left anterior descending artery. d Thin slab maximum intensity projection of the aneurysmatic proximal right coronary artery and left anterior descending artery. e A clearly depicted giant aneurysm of the left anterior descending artery, visualized with coronary angiography
Fig. 3Flow diagram of the monitoring of Kawasaki disease using different imaging modalities. Footnote: Originally published in: Insights into imaging: Dietz SM, Tacke CEA, Kuipers IM, Wiegman A, de Winter RJ, Burns RC, Gordon RB, Groenink M, Kuijpers TW, Cardiovascular imaging in children and adults following Kawasaki disease, Insights into Imaging, 2015;6:697 (adapted version). aWhen information is lacking about coronary arterial aneurysms (CAA) status, calcium score may be indicated as a screening method. If positive, a CMRI with adenosine should be performed. bLong-term follow-up (cardiovascular counseling) of risk group 1 may be dictated by national health care policies and future studies. cAccording to the availability and experience of a center with (low-dose) CT angiography. dWhich of the different revascularization options improves prognosis best is unclear to date. eAdditional tests to evaluate for progression to stenotic lesions
|
|
|
|