| Literature DB >> 28656084 |
Mohammad Shokrzadeh1,2, Sara Sadat-Hosseini2, Marjan Fallah2, Fatemeh Shaki1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Hyperglycemia promotes oxidative stress that plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of Diabetic nephropathy (DN). In this study, we investigated the synergism effects of hydroalcoholic extract of Urtica dioica and pioglitazone (PIO) on the prevention of DN in streptozotocin induced-diabetic mice.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; Nephropathy; Oxidative stress; Pioglitazone; Stereptozotocin; Urtica dioica
Year: 2017 PMID: 28656084 PMCID: PMC5478777 DOI: 10.22038/IJBMS.2017.8673
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Basic Med Sci ISSN: 2008-3866 Impact factor: 2.699
Effect of Urtica dioica extracts on blood glucose levels in Streptozocin-induced diabetic mice (mg/dl)
| Groups | Before streptozotocin | Day 0 | Day 30 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 86±4.1 | 87±7.06 | 91±6.3 |
| Diabetic | 85±6 | 289±21[ | 310±22[ |
| DMSO | 91±7.2 | 88±6 | 90±5.5 |
| D+U | 87±5.4[ | 268±18[ | 188±11[ |
| D+Pio | 88±3.9[ | 281±20 [ | 168±13.7 [ |
| D+Pio+U | 87±6.04 [ | 280±19.6[ | 150±10.5[ |
Values represented as mean± SEM (n=6).
P<0.05 compared with control mice,
P<0.05 compared with diabetic mice
Effect of Urtica dioica extracts on body weight in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice (g)
| Groups | Day 0 | Day 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 26±2.08 | 35±2.8 |
| Diabetic | 25.6±2 | 21±1.6 |
| DMSO | 26.1±3 | 33±2.5 |
| D+U | 25.8±2.05 | 30±2.36 |
| D+Pio | 26±2.09 | 29.5±2.7 |
| D+Pio+U | 24.8±2.56 | 32.3±2.58 |
Values represented as mean± SEM (n=6).
P<0.05 compared with control mice,
P<0.05 compared with diabetic mice
Effect of Urtica dioica extracts on serum urea and Creatinine levels in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice (mg/dl)
| Groups | Serum urea (mg/dl) | Creatinine (mg/dl) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 24±3 | 0.5±0.03 |
| Diabetic | 73±9 [ | 1.2±0.08 [ |
| DMSO | 25.1±1.4 | 0.56±0.04 |
| D+UD | 50.2±8[ | 0.85±0.1 [ |
| D+Pio | 38±4 [ | 0.66±0.03 [ |
| D+Pio+UD | 30±6.3 [ | 0.61±0.05 [ |
Values represented as mean±SEM (n=6).
P<0.05 compared with control mice,
P<0.05 compared with diabetic mice
Figure 1Effect of Urtica dioica and pioglitazone (Pio) on diabetes-induced ROS formation in kidney tissue. Values represented as mean±SEM (n=6). aP<0.05 compared with control mice, bP<0.05 compared with diabetic mice
Figure 2Effect of Urtica dioica and pioglitazone (Pio) on Diabetes-induced lipid peroxidation in kidney tissue. Values represented as mean± SEM (n=6). aP<0.05 compared with control mice, bP<0.05 compared with diabetic mice.cP<0.05 compared with PIO group
Figure 3Effect of Urtica dioica and pioglitazone (PIO) on protein carbonyl level in kidney of diabetic mice. Values represented as mean± SEM (n=6). aP<0.05 compared with control mice,bP<0.05 compared with diabetic mice
Figure 4Effect of Urtica dioica and pioglitazone (PIO) on diabetes-induced GSH oxidation in kidney tissue. Values represented as mean±SEM (n=6). aP<0.05 compared with control mice,b P<0.05 compared with diabetic mice
Figure 5the mean percentage of DPPH free radical scavenging and anti-oxidant BHT by different concentrations of Urtica dioica extract