Literature DB >> 28655844

Demotivating incentives and motivation crowding out in charitable giving.

Matthew Chao1.   

Abstract

Research has shown that extrinsic incentives can crowd out intrinsic motivation in many contexts. Despite this, many nonprofits offer conditional thank-you gifts, such as mugs or tote bags, in exchange for donations. In collaboration with a nonprofit, this study implements a direct mail field experiment and demonstrates that thank-you gifts reduced donation rates in a fundraising campaign. Attention-based multiattribute choice models suggest that this is because prospective donors shift attention to the salient gift offer, causing them to underweight less salient intrinsic motives. Attention to the gift may also cause individuals to adopt a more cost-benefit mindset, further de-emphasizing intrinsic motives. Consistent with these hypotheses, crowding out was driven by those who donated higher amounts in the previous year (i.e., those who likely had higher intrinsic motivation). In a complementary online experiment, thank-you gifts also reduced donation rates but only when the gift was visually salient. This corroborates the mediating role of attention in crowding out. Taken together, the laboratory and field results demonstrate that this fundraising technique can be demotivating in some contexts and that this may occur through an attention-based mechanism.

Keywords:  attention; charitable giving; motivation crowding out; multiattribute choice; saliency

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28655844      PMCID: PMC5514700          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616921114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving.

Authors:  Stefano DellaVigna; John A List; Ulrike Malmendier
Journal:  Q J Econ       Date:  2012

2.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Carrie Armel; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Effort for payment. A tale of two markets.

Authors:  James Heyman; Dan Ariely
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-11

4.  Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Behavioral economics. Avoiding overhead aversion in charity.

Authors:  Uri Gneezy; Elizabeth A Keenan; Ayelet Gneezy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The attentional drift-diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Dingchao Lu; Colin Camerer; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-13
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  An experimental test of fundraising appeals targeting donor and recipient benefits.

Authors:  John A List; James J Murphy; Michael K Price; Alexander G James
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-04-12

2.  Lateral reading and monetary incentives to spot disinformation about science.

Authors:  Folco Panizza; Piero Ronzani; Carlo Martini; Simone Mattavelli; Tiffany Morisseau; Matteo Motterlini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.