In humans, gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in RHBDF2 cause the skin disease tylosis. We generated a mouse model of human tylosis and show that GOF mutations in RHBDF2 cause tylosis by enhancing the amount of amphiregulin (AREG) secretion. Furthermore, we show that genetic disruption of AREG ameliorates skin pathology in mice carrying the human tylosis disease mutation. Collectively, our data suggest that RHBDF2 plays a critical role in regulating EGFR signaling and its downstream events, including development of tylosis, by facilitating enhanced secretion of AREG. Thus, targeting AREG could have therapeutic benefit in the treatment of tylosis.
In humans, gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in RHBDF2 cause the skin disease tylosis. We generated a mouse model of humantylosis and show that GOF mutations in RHBDF2 cause tylosis by enhancing the amount of amphiregulin (AREG) secretion. Furthermore, we show that genetic disruption of AREG ameliorates skin pathology in mice carrying the humantylosis disease mutation. Collectively, our data suggest that RHBDF2 plays a critical role in regulating EGFR signaling and its downstream events, including development of tylosis, by facilitating enhanced secretion of AREG. Thus, targeting AREG could have therapeutic benefit in the treatment of tylosis.
The role of RHBDF2 in enhancing amphiregulin (AREG) secretion, and consequently activating the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway, has significance for the skin disease tylosis. In humans, autosomal dominant mutations in RHBDF2 cause tylosis (Blaydon et al., 2012; Saarinen et al., 2012), a form of focal nonepidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) that manifests on the skin of the palms and soles (Stevens et al., 1996). Tylosispatients also present oral leukokeratosis and follicular hyperkeratosis (Field et al., 1997; Hennies et al., 1995). Currently, there is no cure for tylosis. In a study to identify genetic variants underlying tylosis, Blaydon et al. used targeted capture array and next-generation sequencing and identified two heterozygous missense mutations in the RHBDF2 gene that underlie tylosis, p.Ile186Thr and p.Pro189Leu (Blaydon et al., 2012). Further, substantial evidence implicates the involvement of AREG-induced constitutive activation of the EGFR pathway in tylosis (Blaydon et al., 2012; Brooke et al., 2014; Hosur et al., 2014). In addition, skin biopsies of tylosispatients suggest increased EGFR activity (Blaydon et al., 2012). Together, these results, along with the recent findings that mutations in Rhbdf2 in mice result in enhanced EGFR pathway activation (Hosur et al., 2014; Siggs et al., 2014), suggest a possible mechanism for the association between RHBDF2 mutations and tylosis. However, the detailed physiological role of RHBDF2 in facilitating secretion of AREG needs to be established.Here, we generated mice carrying a human GOF mutation p.P189L (p.P159L in mice) in RHBDF2 to examine whether GOF mutations in humanRHBDF2 lead to enhanced AREG secretion and tylosis. We provide evidence that Rhbdf2 GOF mutations enhance AREG secretion to cause hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis. In addition, we show that genetic ablation of AREG attenuates skin disease in the Rhbdf2mouse model of humantylosis. Together, our data strongly suggest that inhibition of AREG could have potential therapeutic value in the treatment of tylosis.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The human tylosis disease mutation enhances AREG secretion
Autosomal dominant mutations in the humanRHBDF2 gene cause tylosis (Blaydon et al., 2012; Saarinen et al., 2012). Substantial evidence implicates the involvement of AREG-induced constitutive activation of the EGFR pathway (Blaydon et al., 2012; Brooke et al., 2014; Hosur et al., 2014) in humantylosis. We recently showed that similar to GOF mutations in the mouseRhbdf2 gene (Rhbdf2), GOF mutations in humanRHBDF2 (tylosis mutation p.I186T) promote increased secretion of AREG in vitro (Hosur et al., 2014). To determine in vivo whether the Rhbdf2 mutation (Fig. 1A, loss of the cytosolic N-terminal domain of RHBDF2) phenocopies humantylosis, and whether the tylosisp.P189L mutation (Fig. 1B, missense mutation in the cytosolic N-terminal domain of RHBDF2) in RHBDF2 increases AREG secretion, we generated mice carrying the humantylosis mutation p.P189L (p.P159L in mice) using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeting and homology-directed repair in C57BL/6J zygotes (Fig. 1C). We characterized the resulting Rhbdf2mice and observed that similarly to Rhbdf2mice (Hosur et al., 2014), mice carrying the humantylosis mutation present with complete hair loss (Fig. 1D). However, unlike Rhbdf2mice (Hosur et al., 2014; Siggs et al., 2014), which present complete hair loss throughout their lives, Rhbdf2mice developed a thin layer of curly hair coat that was noticeable in adult mice (Fig. 1E), indicating that the Rhbdf2 phenotype is more severe than that of Rhbdf2. Nevertheless, Rhbdf2mice elicited significantly accelerated wound healing, as determined by ear punch closure (Fig. 2A,B). Additionally, accelerated wound healing was associated with an increase in stimulated secretion of AREG in Rhbdf2 MEKs compared with Rhbdf2 MEKs (Fig. 2C).
Fig. 1.
The human tylosis mutation enhances secretion of AREG. (A) Schematic of the mouse Rhbdf2 mutation, which results in the loss of the cytosolic N-terminus domain of RHBDF2 (ΔN-RHBDF2). (B) Schematic of the human RHBDF2 (p.P189L) mutation in the cytosolic N-terminus domain. (C) Sequencing chromatograms of Rhbdf2, Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2 mice. Arrows indicate a heterozygous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (CCA/CTA) or homozygous SNP (CTA). (D) Images of Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2 mice at postnatal day 11. Significant hair loss is visible in Rhbdf2 mice as early as day 11. (E) Representative image of an eight-week-old female Rhbdf2 mouse presenting a thin hair coat.
Fig. 2.
Rapid wound healing and proliferative skin phenotype in (A) Representative images of regenerating ear tissue in eight-week-old female Rhbdf2 mice at 14 days postwounding. Magnification, 4×; scale bars: 1 mm. (B) Quantification of ear hole closures shown in A. Rhbdf2 (n=6) and Rhbdf2 (n=4). (C) ELISA quantitation of AREG levels in the supernatants of cultured Rhbdf2 MEKs in response to stimulation with 100 nM PMA for the indicated times. (D) H&E-stained skin sections of female Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2 mice. Both the Rhbdf2 mice present with significant hyperplasia (H), hyperkeratosis (arrow), enlarged sebaceous glands (S), and follicular dystrophy (F) compared with the Rhbdf2 mice. Scale bars: 100 μm (low magnification); 50 μm (high magnification).
The humantylosis mutation enhances secretion of AREG. (A) Schematic of the mouseRhbdf2 mutation, which results in the loss of the cytosolic N-terminus domain of RHBDF2 (ΔN-RHBDF2). (B) Schematic of the humanRHBDF2 (p.P189L) mutation in the cytosolic N-terminus domain. (C) Sequencing chromatograms of Rhbdf2, Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2mice. Arrows indicate a heterozygous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (CCA/CTA) or homozygous SNP (CTA). (D) Images of Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2mice at postnatal day 11. Significant hair loss is visible in Rhbdf2mice as early as day 11. (E) Representative image of an eight-week-old female Rhbdf2mouse presenting a thin hair coat.Rapid wound healing and proliferative skin phenotype in (A) Representative images of regenerating ear tissue in eight-week-old female Rhbdf2mice at 14 days postwounding. Magnification, 4×; scale bars: 1 mm. (B) Quantification of ear hole closures shown in A. Rhbdf2 (n=6) and Rhbdf2 (n=4). (C) ELISA quantitation of AREG levels in the supernatants of cultured Rhbdf2 MEKs in response to stimulation with 100 nM PMA for the indicated times. (D) H&E-stained skin sections of female Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2mice. Both the Rhbdf2mice present with significant hyperplasia (H), hyperkeratosis (arrow), enlarged sebaceous glands (S), and follicular dystrophy (F) compared with the Rhbdf2mice. Scale bars: 100 μm (low magnification); 50 μm (high magnification).Next, to examine whether mice carrying the humantylosis mutation phenocopy the Rhbdf2 mutation (Hosur et al., 2014), we performed histological analysis of skin sections from Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2mice. Rhbdf2mice presented with follicular dystrophy (F), enlarged sebaceous glands (S), hyperplasia (H), and hyperkeratosis (arrow) of skin (Fig. 2D). To assess enhanced EGFR signaling in the skin of Rhbdf2mice, we performed immunohistochemical analyses of skin sections from Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2mice. We observed a considerable increase in epidermal EGFR signaling pathway downstream effectors phospho-ERK1/2 and phospho-mTOR (Fig. 3A). Similarly, immunoblot analyses of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) isolated from Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2mice also revealed enhanced EGFR signaling as demonstrated by reduced EGFR protein levels (due to downregulation of sustained EGFR receptor activation), and by enhanced protein levels of phospho-AKT, phospho-ERK1/2 and phospho-S6 in Rhbdf2MEFs compared with those of Rhbdf2mice (Fig. 3B). Also, there was a two- to threefold increase in the levels of the proliferation marker Ki-67 in the skin of Rhbdf2mice compared with that of Rhbdf2mice (Fig. 3C). Collectively, these data suggest that Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2 are GOF mutations in the Rhbdf2 gene, and that these mutations enhance secretion of AREG to cause tylosis.
Fig. 3.
Enhanced EGFR signaling in (A) Immunohistochemical staining of Rhbdf2 skin sections with phospho-ERK1/2 and phospho-mTOR. Arrows indicate increased levels of phospho-ERK1/2 and phospho-mTOR staining. Scale bars: 100 μm. (B) Immunoblot analysis of cell lysates obtained from Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2 MEFs. Actin served as a loading control. Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). (C) Immunohistochemical staining of Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2 skin sections with proliferation marker Ki-67. Quantification of proliferating cells was performed as described previously (Almeida et al., 2012). Scale bars: 100 μm.
Enhanced EGFR signaling in (A) Immunohistochemical staining of Rhbdf2 skin sections with phospho-ERK1/2 and phospho-mTOR. Arrows indicate increased levels of phospho-ERK1/2 and phospho-mTOR staining. Scale bars: 100 μm. (B) Immunoblot analysis of cell lysates obtained from Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2MEFs. Actin served as a loading control. Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). (C) Immunohistochemical staining of Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2 skin sections with proliferation marker Ki-67. Quantification of proliferating cells was performed as described previously (Almeida et al., 2012). Scale bars: 100 μm.
AREG deficiency restores the normal skin phenotype in Rhbdf2 mice
Mice carrying the humantylosis GOF mutation Rhbdf2 elicit enhanced AREG secretion (Fig. 2). To test whether AREG drives the skin disease phenotype in Rhbdf2mice, we genetically deleted AREG in Rhbdf2mice by crossing Rhbdf2 with AREG-null mice. Rhbdf2mice lacking AREG presented a full wavy coat rather than a partial hair-loss phenotype of Rhbdf2mice (Fig. 4A). We confirmed that these mice are null for AREG by measuring serum AREG levels in Rhbdf2, Rhbdf2, Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2mice. As expected, we found no detectable levels of AREG in Rhbdf2mice (Fig. 4B). Additionally, whereas homozygous mutant Rhbdf2mice had various degrees of follicular dystrophy or hair loss, the homozygous mutant mice with no AREG had no follicular dystrophy or hair loss (Fig. 4C). Also, there was no evidence of hyperplasia or hyperkeratosis of skin in Rhbdf2mice (Fig. 4D). Collectively, these data strongly suggest that AREG mediates the skin disease phenotype of mice carrying the humantylosis mutation Rhbdf2, and that AREG is thus a potential therapeutic target for treating the skin disease tylosis.
Fig. 4.
Genetic deletion of (A) Representative images of age-matched Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2 male mice. Rhbdf2 mice show a loss of hair phenotype (1); Rhbdf2 mice show a full hair coat (2). (B) Percentage serum AREG levels in age-matched female Rhbdf2, Rhbdf2, Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2 mice. AREG was not detected (ND) in the serum of Rhbdf2 mice. Data represent mean±s.d. (n=4 mice per group). (C,D) H&E-stained skin sections of male Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2 mice. Follicular dystrophy, hyperplasia (H) and hyperkeratosis (arrow) observed in Rhbdf2 mice are restored in Rhbdf2 mice. We found no evidence of follicular dystrophy (arrowhead), hyperplasia or hyperkeratosis of skin (asterisk) in Rhbdf2 mice. Scale bars: 200 μm (low magnification); 100 μm (high magnification).
Genetic deletion of (A) Representative images of age-matched Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2 male mice. Rhbdf2mice show a loss of hair phenotype (1); Rhbdf2mice show a full hair coat (2). (B) Percentage serum AREG levels in age-matched female Rhbdf2, Rhbdf2, Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2mice. AREG was not detected (ND) in the serum of Rhbdf2mice. Data represent mean±s.d. (n=4 mice per group). (C,D) H&E-stained skin sections of male Rhbdf2 and Rhbdf2mice. Follicular dystrophy, hyperplasia (H) and hyperkeratosis (arrow) observed in Rhbdf2mice are restored in Rhbdf2mice. We found no evidence of follicular dystrophy (arrowhead), hyperplasia or hyperkeratosis of skin (asterisk) in Rhbdf2mice. Scale bars: 200 μm (low magnification); 100 μm (high magnification).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Mice were bred and maintained under modified barrier conditions at The Jackson Laboratory (JAX). The Animal Care and Use Committee at JAX approved the experimental procedures. For the tylosis mutation, we targeted the Rhbdf2 locus in C57BL/6J zygotes by pronuclear microinjection of Cas9 mRNA (60 ng/μl), single guide RNA (sgRNA) (30 ng/μl), and single-stranded oligonucleotide DNA (ssDNA) (1 ng/μl). A total of 10 pups were born, and five of the 10 pups exhibited partial to complete hair loss. Tail DNA was amplified using PCR and then sequenced, and subsequently founder mice carrying the desired modified alleles were backcrossed to C57BL/6J mice to validate germline transmission. The resulting offspring heterozygous for the Rhbdf2 allele were intercrossed to generate homozygous C57BL/6J-Rhbdf2mice. Similar to the Rhbdf2 heterozygous mice (Hosur et al., 2014; Johnson et al., 2003; Siggs et al., 2014), the Rhbdf2 heterozygous mice present with a normal hair coat, and moreover there is no evidence of epidermal hyperplasia or hyperkeratosis. We recently showed that B6.Cg-Areg/J mice carry a T-to-G point mutation that disrupts the coding frame and introduces a premature stop codon in the Areg gene (Hosur et al., 2014). B6.Cg-Areg/J do not produce a functional AREG protein; hence, Aregmice are referred to as Areg in this manuscript.
Ear hole closure and histology
Ear punch closure, histology and histological analyses of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections were performed as previously described (Hosur et al., 2014). Slides were scanned using a Nanozoomer digital slide scanner (2.0-HT, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) and analyzed with the help of Dr Rosalinda Doty, a board-certified pathologist at JAX.
Isolation of fibroblasts and keratinocytes
MEFs were isolated from 13.5 days postcoitum mouse embryos using Liberase DL (Sigma-Aldrich). Embryos were dissected in 15 ml sterile serum-free DMEM and minced with a razor blade in a 100 mm petri dish. The DMEM medium was replaced with fresh serum-free DMEM containing Liberase DL (0.5 mg/ml), and the cell suspension was allowed to incubate at 37°C for 75 min. Following incubation, cells were centrifuged, washed three times with sterile PBS, re-suspended in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotic/antimycotic (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and plated in collagen-coated T-75 flasks. Mouse embryonic keratinocytes were isolated from the skin of embryonic day 18 mouse embryos using Neutral Protease (Dispase) (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, USA). Briefly, skin was peeled off, washed twice with sterile PBS, and incubated in Keratinocyte Growth Medium-2 (Lonza, Allendale, USA) containing antibiotic/antimycotic (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Following overnight incubation at 4°C, epidermis was carefully separated from dermis and placed in a sterile petri dish containing 2 ml trypsin (TrypLE Select Enzyme, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min at room temperature. Subsequently, trypsin was neutralized with Defined Trypsin Inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific), the cell suspension was centrifuged, and cells were seeded in collagen-coated six-well plates.
AREG ELISA
MEKs seeded in collagen-coated six-well dishes were stimulated with 100 nM PMA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) for the indicated times. AREG protein levels in the conditioned medium were measured using a MouseAmphiregulin DuoSet ELISA Developmental Kit (#DY989, R&D Systems). A spectrophotometer (SpectraMax 190, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, USA) was used to determine the optical density.
SDS/PAGE and immunoblotting
SDS/PAGE and immunoblotting assays were performed as described previously (Hosur et al., 2014). Briefly, MEFs grown in six-well dishes were lysed with RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling Technology) and protein concentrations were determined using a Qubit Fluorometer (Life Technologies). After loading 50 μg of protein onto 4-20% (wt/vol) precast gels (Lonza), proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane, before blocking with 5% milk for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Membranes were then exposed to EGFR (#2232; 1:1000), phospho-ERK1/2 (#4370; 1:1000), phospho-AKT (#4060; 1:1000), phospho-S6 (#4858,; 1:1000 dilution) or actin (#4970; 1:1000) antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology) overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, membranes were washed in TBST for 2 h, exposed to secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:10,000) for 1 h at RT, and washed for 2 h in TBST. Membranes were then exposed to Luminol reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 3 min and visualized using a gel documentation system (G:BOX F3, Syngene, Frederick, USA).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical staining of skin sections with specific antibodies [phospho-p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2) (#4370, Cell Signaling Technology; 1:400), phospho-mTOR (#2976, Cell Signaling Technology; 1:100) and Ki-67 (Thermo Fisher Scientific; prediluted)] was performed on a Ventana Discovery XT automated IHC research slide staining system (Roche, Tucson, USA). For antigen unmasking, deparaffinized slides were pretreated with Cell Conditioning Solution (Ki-67) or citrate buffer (10 mM Sodium Citrate, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0) (phospho-ERK1/2 and phospho-mTOR). Ki-67 proliferation index was determined as described previously (Almeida et al., 2012).
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism v6 was used to analyze data. Student's t-test was used to assess the statistical difference between two groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Authors: H P Stevens; D P Kelsell; S P Bryant; D T Bishop; N K Spurr; J Weissenbach; D Marger; R S Marger; I M Leigh Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 1996-06
Authors: Silva Saarinen; Pia Vahteristo; Rainer Lehtonen; Kristiina Aittomäki; Virpi Launonen; Tuula Kiviluoto; Lauri A Aaltonen Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Kenneth R Johnson; Priscilla W Lane; Susan A Cook; Belinda S Harris; Patricia F Ward-Bailey; Roderick T Bronson; Bonnie L Lyons; Leonard D Shultz; Muriel T Davisson Journal: Genomics Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.736
Authors: Vishnu Hosur; Kenneth R Johnson; Lisa M Burzenski; Timothy M Stearns; Richard S Maser; Leonard D Shultz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-05-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Diana C Blaydon; Sarah L Etheridge; Janet M Risk; Hans-Christian Hennies; Laura J Gay; Rebecca Carroll; Vincent Plagnol; Fiona E McRonald; Howard P Stevens; Nigel K Spurr; D Timothy Bishop; Anthony Ellis; Janusz Jankowski; John K Field; Irene M Leigh; Andrew P South; David P Kelsell Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Jonas S Almeida; Egiebade E Iriabho; Vijaya L Gorrepati; Sean R Wilkinson; Alexander Grüneberg; David E Robbins; James R Hackney Journal: J Pathol Inform Date: 2012-07-20
Authors: Owen M Siggs; Adam Grieve; Hongmei Xu; Paul Bambrough; Yonka Christova; Matthew Freeman Journal: Biol Open Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 2.422
Authors: Matthew A Brooke; Sarah L Etheridge; Nihal Kaplan; Charlotte Simpson; Edel A O'Toole; Akemi Ishida-Yamamoto; Olivier Marches; Spiro Getsios; David P Kelsell Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Satoshi Kubo; Jill M Fritz; Hayley M Raquer-McKay; Rhea Kataria; Ivan Vujkovic-Cvijin; Ahmad Al-Shaibi; Yikun Yao; Lixin Zheng; Juan Zou; Alex D Waldman; Xinyi Jing; Taylor K Farley; Ann Y Park; Andrew J Oler; Adrian K Charles; Melanie Makhlouf; Eman H AbouMoussa; Reem Hasnah; Luis R Saraiva; Sundar Ganesan; Abdulrahman Ahmed Al-Subaiey; Helen Matthews; Emilio Flano; Hyun Hee Lee; Alexandra F Freeman; Asena Pınar Sefer; Ersin Sayar; Erkan Çakır; Elif Karakoc-Aydiner; Safa Baris; Yasmine Belkaid; Ahmet Ozen; Bernice Lo; Michael J Lenardo Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Vishnu Hosur; Michelle L Farley; Benjamin E Low; Lisa M Burzenski; Leonard D Shultz; Michael V Wiles Journal: Front Genet Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Vishnu Hosur; Michelle L Farley; Lisa M Burzenski; Leonard D Shultz; Michael V Wiles Journal: FEBS Open Bio Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 2.693
Authors: Lisa M Burzenski; Benjamin E Low; Vivek Kohar; Leonard D Shultz; Michael V Wiles; Vishnu Hosur Journal: Mamm Genome Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 2.957