Literature DB >> 28655499

Continuous exposure to low-frequency noise and carbon disulfide: Combined effects on hearing.

Thomas Venet1, Maria Carreres-Pons2, Monique Chalansonnet3, Aurélie Thomas3, Lise Merlen3, Hervé Nunge3, Elodie Bonfanti3, Frédéric Cosnier3, Jordi Llorens4, Pierre Campo5.   

Abstract

Carbon disulfide (CS2) is used in industry; it has been shown to have neurotoxic effects, causing central and distal axonopathies.However, it is not considered cochleotoxic as it does not affect hair cells in the organ of Corti, and the only auditory effects reported in the literature were confined to the low-frequency region. No reports on the effects of combined exposure to low-frequency noise and CS2 have been published to date. This article focuses on the effects on rat hearing of combined exposure to noise with increasing concentrations of CS2 (0, 63,250, and 500ppm, 6h per day, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks). The noise used was a low-frequency noise ranging from 0.5 to 2kHz at an intensity of 106dB SPL. Auditory function was tested using distortion product oto-acoustic emissions, which mainly reflects the cochlear performances. Exposure to noise alone caused an auditory deficit in a frequency area ranging from 3.6 to 6 kHz. The damaged area was approximately one octave (6kHz) above the highest frequency of the exposure noise (2.8kHz); it was a little wider than expected based on the noise spectrum.Consequently, since maximum hearing sensitivity is located around 8kHz in rats, low-frequency noise exposure can affect the cochlear regions detecting mid-range frequencies. Co-exposure to CS2 (250-ppm and over) and noise increased the extent of the damaged frequency window since a significant auditory deficit was measured at 9.6kHz in these conditions.Moreover, the significance at 9.6kHz increased with the solvent concentrations. Histological data showed that neither hair cells nor ganglion cells were damaged by CS2. This discrepancy between functional and histological data is discussed. Like most aromatic solvents, carbon disulfide should be considered as a key parameter in hearing conservation régulations.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon disulfide; Combined exposure; Dose effect; Hearing; Low-frequency noise; Rat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28655499     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2017.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotoxicology        ISSN: 0161-813X            Impact factor:   4.294


  2 in total

1.  Effects of co-exposure to CS2 and noise on hearing and balance in rats: continuous versus intermittent CS2 exposures.

Authors:  Monique Chalansonnet; Maria Carreres-Pons; Thomas Venet; Aurélie Thomas; Lise Merlen; Stéphane Boucard; Frédéric Cosnier; Hervé Nunge; Elodie Bonfanti; Jordi Llorens; Pierre Campo; Benoît Pouyatos
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.646

2.  Sound-stress-induced altered nociceptive behaviors are associated with increased spinal CRFR2 gene expression in a rat model of burn injury.

Authors:  Natasha M Sosanya; Alex V Trevino; Roger L Chavez; Robert J Christy; Bopaiah P Cheppudira
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.133

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.