| Literature DB >> 28655305 |
Zahra Amri1, Asma Ghorbel2, Mouna Turki3, Férièle Messadi Akrout2, Fatma Ayadi3, Abdelfateh Elfeki4, Mohamed Hammami5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate beneficial effects of Pomegranate seeds oil (PSO), leaves (PL), juice (PJ) and (PP) on brain cholinesterase activity, brain oxidative stress and lipid profile in high-fat-high fructose diet (HFD) induced-obese rat.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-cholinesterase activity; Brain; Obesity; Oxidative stress; Pomegranate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28655305 PMCID: PMC5488477 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1842-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
IC50 values of AChE inhibitory activity in vitro of pomegranate extracts
| PSO | PJ | PP | PL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 | 229.38 ± 2.66b | 181.52 ± 8.56ab | 349.31 ± 57.95c | 151.85 ± 7.42a |
Values represent mean ± SD of replicate experiments (n = 3). (p < 0.05)
Fig. 1Effect of different pomegranate parts on activity of Butyrylcholinesterase in HFD rat brain. Pomegranate seeds oil (PSO). Pomegranate Juice (PJ). Pomegranate Peel (PP) and Pomegranate Leaves (PL). No significant difference was recorded between all groups
Effects of pomegranate extracts on body and brain weight
| CG | HFD | HFD + PSO | HFD + PJ | HFD + PP | HFD + PL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start weight | 240.8 ± 4.62 | 236 ± 7.03 | 236.8 ± 10.57 | 239.6 ± 4.02 | 237.4 ± 6.24 | 237.8 ± 8.7 |
| End weight | 352.4 ± 10.71 | 411.8 ± 6.01a | 387 ± 5.56ab | 383 ± 11.85ab | 372.8 ± 4.6ab | 368.8 ± 17.23ab |
| Brain weight | 1.46 ± 0.04 | 1.63 ± 0.07a | 1.56 ± 0.06 | 1.48 ± 0.12b | 1.50 ± 0.07b | 1.5 ± 0.02 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6); a p < 0.05 vs control group; b p < 0.05 vs HFD group
Effects of pomegranate extracts on plasma lipid profile and liver enzyme content
| Groups | GC | HFD | HFD + PSO | HFD + PJ | HFD + PP | HFD + PL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mmol/l) | 1.64 ± 0.25 | 3.28 ± 0.33a | 2.49 ± 0.43a | 2.18 ± 0.73b | 2.01 ± 0.71b | 2.58 ± 0.79a |
| HDL(mmol/l) | 1.22 ± 0.096 | 0.7 ± 0.4a | 0.58 ± 0.19a | 0.64 ± 0.32a | 0.89 ± 0.32 | 1.25 ± 0.26b |
| LDL (mmol/l) | 0.63 ± 0.26 | 2.31 ± 0.63a | 0.6 ± 0.16b | 0.59 ± 0.1b | 0.63 ± 0.13b | 0.55 ± 0.21b |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.02 ± 0.37 | 2.74 ± 0.41a | 1.22 ± 0.3b | 1.23 ± 0.58b | 1.05 ± 0.59b | 0.94 ± 0.32b |
| AST (U/l) | 121.6 ± 14.01 | 161.4 ± 48.5 | 120 ± 11.74 | 155.4 ± 34 | 109.4 ± 28.48b | 111.8 ± 45.04b |
| ALT (U/l) | 31.2 ± 6.34 | 32.6 ± 7.73 | 28.2 ± 10.63 | 29.8 ± 11.6 | 28.2 ± 6.97 | 29.8 ± 8.04 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6); a p < 0.05 vs control group; b p < 0.05 vs HFD group
Fig. 2Effect of different pomegranate parts on MDA activity in HFD rat brain. Pomegranate Seeds Oil (PSO). Pomegranate Juice (PJ). Pomegranate Peel (PP) and Pomegranate Leaves (PL). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. (n = 6). P < 0.05 was considered significant. a indicate significant difference compared to the values of CG. b indicate significant difference compared to the values of HFD groups
Fig. 3Effect of different pomegranate parts on protein carbonylation in HFD rat brain. Pomegranate Seeds Oil (PSO). Pomegranate Juice (PJ). Pomegranate Peel (PP) and Pomegranate Leaves (PL). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. (n = 6). P < 0.05 was considered significant. a indicate significant difference compared to the values of CG. b indicate significant difference compared to the values of HFD groups
Fig. 4Effect of different pomegranate parts on SOD activity in HFD rat brain. Pomegranate Seeds Oil (PSO). Pomegranate Juice (PJ). Pomegranate Peel (PP) and Pomegranate Leaves (PL). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. (n = 6). P < 0.05 was considered significant. a indicate significant difference compared to the values of CG. b indicate significant difference compared to the values of HFD groups
Fig. 5Effect of different pomegranate parts on GPx activity in HFD rat brain. Pomegranate Seeds Oil (PSO). Pomegranate Juice (PJ). Pomegranate Peel (PP) and Pomegranate Leaves (PL). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. (n = 6). P < 0.05 was considered significant. a indicate significant difference compared to the values of CG. b indicate significant difference compared to the values of HFD groups