| Literature DB >> 28654691 |
Tiezhu Liu1, Fuzhen Wang2, Shuang Zhang1, Feng Wang1, Qingling Meng1, Guomin Zhang2, Fuqiang Cui2, Dorji Dunzhu3, Wenjiao Yin1, Shengli Bi1, Liping Shen1.
Abstract
Tibet is a highly hepatitis B virus (HBV) endemic area. Two types of C/D recombinant HBV are commonly isolated in Tibet and have been previously described. In an effort to better understand the molecular characteristic of these C/D recombinant strains from Tibet, we undertook a multistage random sampling project to collect HBsAg positive samples. Molecular epidemiological and bio-informational technologies were used to analyze the characteristics of the sequences found in this study. There were 60 samples enrolled in the survey, and we obtained 19 whole-genome sequences. 19 samples were all C/D recombinant, and could be divided into two sub-types named C/D1 and C/D2 according to the differences in the location of the recombinant breakpoint. The recombination breakpoint of the 10 strains belonging to the C/D1 sub-type was located at nt750, while the 9 stains belonging to C/D2 had their recombination break point at nt1530. According to whole-genome sequence analysis, the 19 identified strains belong to genotype C, but the nucleotide distance was more than 5% between the 19 strains and sub-genotypes C1 to C15. The distance between C/D1with C2 was 5.8±2.1%, while the distance between C/D2 with C2 was 6.4±2.1%. The parental strain was most likely sub-genotype C2. C/D1 strains were all collected in the middle and northern areas of Tibet including Lhasa, Linzhi and Ali, while C/D2 was predominant in Shannan in southern Tibet. This indicates that the two recombinant genotypes are regionally distributed in Tibet. These results provide important information for the study of special HBV recombination events, gene features, virus evolution, and the control and prevention policy of HBV in Tibet.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28654691 PMCID: PMC5487078 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Primers for nest-PCR.
| Primer | Step | Position (nt) | Sequence of primer |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | First round | 1799–1826 | |
| (1) | First round | 1774–1801 | |
| (2) | Second round | 1847–1867 | |
| (2) | Second round | 2394–2408 | |
| (3) | Second round | 2298–2315 | |
| (3) | Second round | 2933–2954 | |
| (4) | Second round | 2821–2840 | |
| (4) | Second round | 272–291 | |
| (5) | Second round | 179–197 | |
| (5) | Second round | 704–725 | |
| (6) | Second round | 599–619 | |
| (6) | Second round | 1286–1305 | |
| (7) | Second round | 1175–1190 | |
| (7) | Second round | 1788–1802 | |
| (8) | First round | 1608–1627 | |
| (8) | First round | 2471–2489 | |
| (9) | Second round | 1697–1718 | |
| (9) | Second round | 2352–2372 |
Basic information of 19 HBV whole-genome sequences obtained from Tibet.
| Area | Numbers of samples | Age(years) | Gender | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |||
| 1 | 45 | 1 | 0 | |
| 6 | 32±6 | 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 34±4 | 3 | 2 | |
| 2 | 28±3 | 2 | 0 | |
| 5 | 41±2 | 3 | 2 | |
| 19 | 36±5 | 13 | 6 | |
Fig 1Phylogenetic analysis construct by whole-genome sequences of 19 HBV detected in this study compared with reference strains representing genotypes A,B,C,D,F,I.
Fig 2The results of bootscan analysis demonstrate the recombination of genotypes C and D.
As shown in part A, TibetAli-1, which represents the C/D1 recombinant, was compared with eight representative HBV genotypes—A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H (GenBank accessions: M57663, AB205121, AB205125, AY161150, AB205192, AB166850, AV058513, AY090454, respectively). The recombinant position is at nt 750. As shown in part B, TibetShannan-1 represents C/D2; the recombinant position is at nt 1530bp.As shown in part C, genotype A represents the non-recombinant strain.
Nucleotide distance (%) among the two types of C/D recombinant strains and other reference genotype and subgenotype strains.
| 1.6±0.3 | |||||||
| 5.9±1.6 | 6.6±1.6 | ||||||
| 5.8±2.1 | 6.4±2.1 | 4.9±1.6 | |||||
| 6.7±2.3 | 7.3±0.8 | 5.0±1.7 | 6.0±2.4 | ||||
| 6.7±2.4 | 7.4±0.2 | 6.8±0.7 | 7.8±1.3 | 6.4±0.3 | |||
| 5.6±2.4 | 6.2±2.1 | 5.5±1.5 | 6.6±0.7 | 6.0±2.2 | 8.2±2.3 |
(Note: The reference genotype strains used in the table are similar to those used in Fig 1. C/D1 and C/D2 were compared with all reference strains; in order to save space, only C1–C5 were shown in this table.)