| Literature DB >> 28654638 |
Magdalena Wszedybyl-Winklewska1, Jacek Wolf2,3, Ewa Swierblewska2, Katarzyna Kunicka2, Kamila Mazur4, Marcin Gruszecki5, Pawel J Winklewski1,6, Andrzej F Frydrychowski1, Leszek Bieniaszewski7, Krzysztof Narkiewicz2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28654638 PMCID: PMC5487010 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the study participants.
Data are presented as mean values and standard deviations (SD).
| Males (n = 9) | Females (n = 11) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 26.3 ± 8.4 | 20.1 ± 2.0 |
| BMI (kg*m-2) | 23.2 ± 4.2 | 22.0 ± 3.5 |
| cc-TQ (AU) | 83.0 ± 34.9 | 60.8 ± 35.4 |
| sas-TQ (AU) | 130.8 ± 61.1 | 111.9 ± 87.0 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 125.7 ± 4.9 | 117.3 ± 11.4 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 74.2 ± 6.3 | 70.1 ± 3.9 |
| HR (beats*s-1) | 70.7 ± 9.6 | 78.6 ± 10.8 |
| CBFV (cm*s-1) | 41.3 ± 7.8 | 42.7 ± 9.4 |
| RI | 0.67 ± 0.03 | 0.61 ± 0.11 |
| PI | 1.48 ± 0.19 | 1.25 ± 0.38 |
| SaO2 | 98.3 ± 1.1 | 98.6 ± 1.3 |
cc-TQ–cardiac component of the subarachnoid width (heart-generated pial artery pulsation, from 0.5 Hz to 5.0 Hz); sas-TQ–slow component of the subarachnoid width (<0.05 Hz); SBP–systolic blood pressure; DBP–diastolic blood pressure; HR–heart rate; CBFV–cerebral blood flow velocity; PI–pulsatility index; RI–resistive index; SaO2—oxyhemoglobin saturation; kg–kilograms; m- meters; AU–arbitrary units; mmHg—millimeters of mercury; s–seconds
Fig 1Schematic representation of the study design.
Effects of 60 s Mueller manoeuvres series on SAS, SBP, DBP, HR, CBFV, PI, RI and SaO2.
Data are presented as mean values and standard deviations (SD). All % changes are calculated with reference to baseline values.
| Baseline | Beginning of MMs (13 ± 5 s) | Beginning of MMs vs. Baseline (%) | End of MMs (40 ± 5 s) | End of MMs vs. Baseline (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cc-TQ (AU) | 73.2 ± 59.4 | 60.2 ± 45.6 | 82.2 | 74.9 ± 47.6NS | 102.3 |
| sas-TQ (AU) | 117.8 ± 94.6 | 128.5 ± 94.7NS | 109.1 | 125.0 ± 89.9NS | 106.1 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 127.9 ± 7.3 | 136.0 ± 10.7 | 106.3 | 144.0 ± 12.7 | 112.6 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 77.7 ± 7.9 | 82.9 ± 8.2 | 106.7 | 84.6 ± 10.7 | 108.9 |
| HR (beats*sec-1) | 75.0 ± 9.0 | 77.0 ± 11.0 | 102.7 | 75.0 ± 9.1NS | 100.0 |
| CBFV (cm*sec-1) | 42.1 ± 9.7 | 43.2 ± 10.4NS | 102.6 | 48.0 ± 9.8 | 114.0 |
| RI | 0.62 ± 0.08 | 0.61 ± 0.09NS | 98.4 | 0.55 ± 0.10 | 88.7 |
| PI | 1.31 ± 0.36 | 1.27 ± 0.34NS | 96.9 | 1.12 ± 0.37 | 85.5 |
| SaO2 | 98.8 ± 0.6 | 98.6 ± 0.7 | 99.8 | 97.0 ± 1.5 | 98.2 |
| EtCO2 | 35.3 ± 5.7 | 35.7 ± 5.9 | 101.1 |
*P<0.05
**P<0.01
***P<0.001
cc-TQ–cardiac component of the subarachnoid width (heart-generated pial artery pulsation, from 0.5 Hz to 5.0 Hz); sas-TQ–slow component of the subarachnoid width (<0.05 Hz); SBP–systolic blood pressure; DBP–diastolic blood pressure; EtCO2—end-tidal CO2; HR–heart rate; MBP–mean blood pressure; CBFV–cerebral blood flow velocity; PI–pulsatility index; RI–resistive index; SaO2—oxyhemoglobin saturation; AU–arbitrary units; mm Hg—millimeters of mercury; s–seconds
Multivariate regression analysis.
Model explaining changes in cardiac SAS component with relation to cerebral blood flow velocity, heart rate, oxyhaemoglobin saturation and blood pressure fluctuations in response to the beginning and terminal part of the Mueller manoeuvres.
| (β) | SD | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 ± 5 s of Mueller manoeuvres | |||
| delta CBFV | 0.043 | 0.84 | 0.80 |
| delta HR | -0.090 | 0.76 | 0.59 |
| delta SaO2 | -0.115 | 0.76 | 0.49 |
| delta SBP | 0.367 | 0.72 | 0.02 |
| 40 ± 5 s of Mueller manoeuvres | |||
| delta CBFV | 0.028 | 0.72 | 0.09 |
| delta HR | 0.077 | 0.76 | 0.65 |
| delta SaO2 | -0.261 | 0.71 | 0.11 |
| delta SBP | 0.334 | 0.71 | 0.04 |
CBFV–cerebral blood flow velocity, HR–heart rate; SaO2 –blood oxygen saturation; SBP–systolic blood pressure (continuous recordings); SD–standard deviation.
* standardized slope in the same units of measure
Fig 2Representative tracings from 10 s BP and SAS signals with corresponding wavelet transforms; baseline (panel A), WCO minimum (panel B) and WCO maximum (panel C) from one of participants. The SAS signal (in blue) is less regular than the BP signal (in red). Wavelet transform analysis reveals BP and SAS peaks at cardiac frequency marked with vertical magenta dotted lines (SAS analysis in blue, BP in red). Alterations in cardiac frequency are apparent throughout the Mueller manoeuvres.
Effects of a 60 s Mueller manoeuvres series on WCO and WPCO between BP and SAS oscillations at cardiac frequency.
Data are presented as mean values and standard deviations (SD). The minimum and maximum correspond to WCO minimum and maximum values during the Mueller manoeuvres series.
| WCO / WPCO | Baseline | Minimum | Minimum vs. Baseline (%) | Maximum | Maximum vs. Baseline (%) | Maximum vs. Minimum (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.65 ± 0.15 0.52 ± 0.18 0.86 ± 0.36 0.87 ± 0.35 | 0.44 ± 0.30 0.28 ± 0.26 0.85 ± 0.36 0.83 ± 0.35 | 67.7 | 0.67 ± 0.22 0.64 ± 0.17 0.78 ± 0.42 0.93 ± 0.26 | 103.1NS 123.1NS 90.7NS 106.9NS | 152.3 |
*P<0.05
**P<0.01
***P<0.001
WCO–wavelet coherence; WPCO–wavelet phase coherence; cc-TQ–cardiac component of transillumination quotient (pial artery pulsation); left–left hemisphere; right–right hemisphere; SD–standard deviation
Fig 3Representative tracings of 10 s signals of baseline (in green), 10 s of minimum WCO (in blue) and 10 s of maximum WCO (in red).
BP oscillations (panel A), SAS oscillations (panel B) and WCO (panels C, D and E). Cardiac frequency is indicated by vertical, magenta, dotted lines. Black solid lines (panels from C to E) illustrate results obtained for IAAFT surrogates.
Fig 4Representative WCO (panel B) and WPCO (panel C) tracings. BP (red) and SAS (blue) signals are provided in the panel A. WCO reaches its minimum between 8 and 18 s of the Mueller manoeuvres, and later upon recovery, reaches its maximum between 35 and 45 s for cardiac frequency. WPCO remains stable. Cardiac frequency is indicated by horizontal dotted lines.