Literature DB >> 28654337

Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Extent of Disease.

Stephanie A Lee-Felker1, Leena Tekchandani1, Mariam Thomas1, Esha Gupta1, Denise Andrews-Tang1, Antoinette Roth1, James Sayre1, Guita Rahbar1.   

Abstract

Purpose To compare the diagnostic performances of contrast material-enhanced spectral mammography and breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of index and secondary cancers in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer by using histologic or imaging follow-up as the standard of reference. Materials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study included 52 women who underwent breast MR imaging and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer between March 2014 and October 2015. Of those 52 patients, 46 were referred for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and targeted ultrasonography because they had additional suspicious lesions at MR imaging. In six of the 52 patients, breast cancer had been diagnosed at an outside institution. These patients were referred for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and targeted US as part of diagnostic imaging. Images from contrast-enhanced spectral mammography were analyzed by two fellowship-trained breast imagers with 2.5 years of experience with contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated for both imaging modalities and compared by using the Bennett statistic. Results Fifty-two women with 120 breast lesions were included for analysis (mean age, 50 years; range, 29-73 years). Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography had similar sensitivity to MR imaging (94% [66 of 70 lesions] vs 99% [69 of 70 lesions]), a significantly higher PPV than MR imaging (93% [66 of 71 lesions] vs 60% [69 of 115 lesions]), and fewer false-positive findings than MR imaging (five vs 45) (P < .001 for all results). In addition, contrast-enhanced spectral mammography depicted 11 of the 11 secondary cancers (100%) and MR imaging depicted 10 (91%). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography is potentially as sensitive as MR imaging in the evaluation of extent of disease in newly diagnosed breast cancer, with a higher PPV. © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28654337     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

1.  Preliminary results of computer-aided diagnosis for magnetic resonance imaging of solid breast lesions.

Authors:  Qiujie Yu; Kuan Huang; Ye Zhu; Xiaodan Chen; Wei Meng
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Preoperative imaging for breast conservation surgery-do we need more than conventional imaging for local disease assessment?

Authors:  Eugene Ong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  Applications of Advanced Breast Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Arwa A Alzaghal; Pamela J DiPiro
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM).

Authors:  Francesco Amato; Giulia Bicchierai; Donatello Cirone; Catherine Depretto; Federica Di Naro; Ermanno Vanzi; Gianfranco Scaperrotta; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Vittorio Miele; Jacopo Nori
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Impact of background parenchymal enhancement levels on the diagnosis of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in evaluations of breast cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced breast MRI.

Authors:  Sachiko Yuen; Shuichi Monzawa; Ayako Gose; Seiji Yanai; Yoshihiro Yata; Hajime Matsumoto; You Ichinose; Takashi Tashiro; Kazuhiko Yamagami
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 6.  Contrast-enhanced mammography: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Julie Sogani; Victoria L Mango; Delia Keating; Janice S Sung; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 1.605

7.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis Evaluation of the Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Meng; Yunfeng Sun; Haibin Qian; Xiaodan Chen; Qiujie Yu; Nanding Abiyasi; Shaolei Yan; Haiyong Peng; Hongxia Zhang; Xiushi Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  The Usefulness of Spectral Mammography in Surgical Planning of Breast Cancer Treatment-Analysis of 999 Patients with Primary Operable Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Andrzej Lorek; Katarzyna Steinhof-Radwańska; Anna Barczyk-Gutkowska; Wojciech Zarębski; Piotr Paleń; Karol Szyluk; Joanna Lorek; Anna Grażyńska; Paweł Niemiec; Iwona Gisterek
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matteo Basilio Suter; Filippo Pesapane; Giorgio Maria Agazzi; Tania Gagliardi; Olga Nigro; Anna Bozzini; Francesca Priolo; Silvia Penco; Enrico Cassano; Claudio Chini; Alessandro Squizzato
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  A meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wanqing Xiang; Haiying Rao; Liyu Zhou
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.