Literature DB >> 28653819

The Impact of Prenatal Exposure to Power Plant Emissions on Birth Weight: Evidence from a Pennsylvania Power Plant Located Upwind of New Jersey.

Muzhe Yang1, Rhea A Bhatta2, Shin-Yi Chou1, Cheng-I Hsieh3.   

Abstract

To examine the infant health impact of prenatal exposure to power plant emissions, we draw scientific evidence on the impacted region downwind of a large polluter, a coal-fired power plant located on the border of two states and proven to be the sole contributor to the violation of air quality standards of the impacted region. Our results show that among all live singleton births that occurred during 1990 through 2006, those born to mothers living as far as 20 to 30 miles away downwind from the power plant (which is also an affluent region) during pregnancy are at greater risks of low birth weight (LBW) and very low birth weight (VLBW): the likelihoods of LBW and VLBW could increase approximately by 6.50 and 17.12 percent, respectively. In light of the continual efforts of The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in reducing cross-state air pollution caused by transboundary power plant emissions, our study is aimed at broadening the scope of cross-border pollution impact analysis by taking into account adverse infant health effects of upwind polluters, which can impose disproportionate burdens of health risks on downwind states due to air pollutants transported by wind.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28653819     DOI: 10.1002/pam.21989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage        ISSN: 0276-8739


  10 in total

1.  Retirements of Coal and Oil Power Plants in California: Association With Reduced Preterm Birth Among Populations Nearby.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Deborah Karasek; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Dana E Goin; Kristina Dang; Paula A Braveman; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Drinking water, fracking, and infant health.

Authors:  Elaine L Hill; Lala Ma
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Hazardous Air Pollutants and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Portland, OR.

Authors:  Mary Willis; Perry Hystad
Journal:  Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-12

4.  Shale gas development and infant health: Evidence from Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Elaine L Hill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Impact of Coal-fired Power Plant Emissions on Children's Health: A Systematic Review of the Epidemiological Literature.

Authors:  Eric Amster; Clara Lew Levy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The impact of PM2.5 on mortality in older adults: evidence from retirement of coal-fired power plants in the United States.

Authors:  Maoyong Fan; Yi Wang
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Improving Human Health in China Through Alternative Energy.

Authors:  Melissa Scott; Robert Sander; Gregory Nemet; Jonathan Patz
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-21

Review 8.  Industrial Air Pollution Leads to Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematized Review of Different Exposure Metrics and Health Effects in Newborns.

Authors:  Triin Veber; Usha Dahal; Katrin Lang; Kati Orru; Hans Orru
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2022-08-10

9.  Perinatal Health Inequalities in the Industrial Region of Estonia: A Birth Registry-Based Study.

Authors:  Usha Dahal; Triin Veber; Daniel Oudin Åström; Tanel Tamm; Leena Albreht; Erik Teinemaa; Kati Orru; Hans Orru
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 4.614

10.  Increase in fertility following coal and oil power plant retirements in California.

Authors:  Joan A Casey; Alison Gemmill; Deborah Karasek; Elizabeth L Ogburn; Dana E Goin; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.