Literature DB >> 28653544

Operative Management of Unstable Radial Head Fractures in a Young Active Population.

Nicholas Kusnezov1, Emmanuel Eisenstein1, John C Dunn1, Austin Fares2, Justin Mitchell1, Kelly Kilcoyne1, Brian R Waterman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radial head and neck fractures are the most common elbow fracture in the general adult population; however, the optimal treatment for radial head fractures remains a topic of ongoing clinical controversy. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of return to function, complications, and reoperation following operative management of unstable radial head fractures in a young, active patient population with intense upper extremity demands.
METHODS: A military health care database was queried for all US military servicemembers undergoing open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF; Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code: 24665) and radial head arthroplasty (RHA; CPT code: 24666) between 2010 and 2015. All patients with minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Univariate and chi-square analyses were performed to evaluate the association between potential risk factors and the primary outcome measures.
RESULTS: A total of 67 ORIF (n = 69 elbows) and 10 RHA patients were included. The average age was 31 ± 8.0 years. At mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 1.1 years, 90% of patients overall were able to return to active military service, 96% of which with unrestricted upper extremity function. Nearly one-third (31.2%) of patients developed at least 1 postoperative complication. RHA has higher overall complication rates (70% vs 48%) when compared with ORIF, but this finding did not reach statistical significance ( P = .073). However, RHA had significantly higher rates of implant failure (20% vs 2.9%, P = .0498). Seventeen (21%) individuals required reoperation, 5 of which (6.3%) were revision procedures. Dislocation, coronoid fracture, and concomitant ligamentous repair portended a significantly increased risk of sustaining 1 or more complications ( P < .05), while dislocation and requirement for ligamentous repair independently predicted revision surgery ( P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroplasty and ORIF are both viable options for treating unstable radial head fractures in a young, athletic population, offering comparable return to function despite increased complications with RHA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; functional outcomes; open reduction with internal fixation; radial head arthroplasty; radial head fracture; reoperation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28653544      PMCID: PMC6081782          DOI: 10.1177/1558944717715136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  29 in total

1.  Mason type II radial head fractures: operative versus nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  E E Khalfayan; R W Culp; A H Alexander
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases.

Authors:  M L MASON
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1954-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Comparison between radial head arthroplasty and open reduction and internal fixation in patients with radial head fractures (modified Mason type III and IV): a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Jun Duan; Fengsheng Li
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-01-21

4.  Open reduction and internal fixation versus radial head arthroplasty in the treatment of adult closed comminuted radial head fractures (modified Mason type III and IV).

Authors:  Salah Al-Burdeni; Yousef Abuodeh; Talal Ibrahim; Ghalib Ahmed
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Open reduction and internal fixation of radial head fractures: do outcomes differ between simple and complex injuries?

Authors:  Jeffrey M Pike; Ruby Grewal; George S Athwal; Kenneth J Faber; Graham J W King
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Open reduction and internal fixation of comminuted fractures of the radial head using low-profile mini-plates.

Authors:  M Ikeda; Y Yamashina; M Kamimoto; Y Oka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-09

7.  Midterm results with a bipolar radial head prosthesis: radiographic evidence of loosening at the bone-cement interface.

Authors:  Nebojsa Popovic; Roger Lemaire; Pierre Georis; Philippe Gillet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Fractures of the radial head treated by internal fixation: late results in 26 cases.

Authors:  R D Esser; S Davis; T Taavao
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 9.  Fractures of the radial head and neck: current concepts in management.

Authors:  Nirmal C Tejwani; Hemang Mehta
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  The effect of radial head excision and arthroplasty on elbow kinematics and stability.

Authors:  Daphne M Beingessner; Cynthia E Dunning; Karen D Gordon; James A Johnson; Graham J W King
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  4 in total

1.  30-Day outcomes analysis of surgical management of radial head fractures comparing radial head arthroplasty to open reduction internal fixation.

Authors:  Joshua P Weissman; Mark A Plantz; Erik B Gerlach; Colin K Cantrell; Bennet Butler
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-12

2.  Reoperation Rates and Costs of Radial Head Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Radial Head and Neck Fractures: A Retrospective Database Study.

Authors:  Daniel Reinhardt; E Bruce Toby; Jacob Brubacher
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-04-25

3.  Radial head arthroplasty vs. open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of terrible triad injury of the elbow: A systematic review and meta-analysis update.

Authors:  Xi-Yong Li; Yun-Lu Wang; Su Yang; Peng-Fei Han
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.751

4.  The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nathan N O'Hara; Marckenley Isaac; Gerard P Slobogean; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.