Literature DB >> 28653410

Breeding density, fine-scale tracking, and large-scale modeling reveal the regional distribution of four seabird species.

Ewan D Wakefield1,2, Ellie Owen3, Julia Baer4, Matthew J Carroll1, Francis Daunt5, Stephen G Dodd1, Jonathan A Green6, Tim Guilford7, Roddy A Mavor8, Peter I Miller9, Mark A Newell5, Stephen F Newton4, Gail S Robertson2, Akiko Shoji7, Louise M Soanes6,10, Stephen C Votier11, Sarah Wanless5, Mark Bolton1.   

Abstract

Population-level estimates of species' distributions can reveal fundamental ecological processes and facilitate conservation. However, these may be difficult to obtain for mobile species, especially colonial central-place foragers (CCPFs; e.g., bats, corvids, social insects), because it is often impractical to determine the provenance of individuals observed beyond breeding sites. Moreover, some CCPFs, especially in the marine realm (e.g., pinnipeds, turtles, and seabirds) are difficult to observe because they range tens to ten thousands of kilometers from their colonies. It is hypothesized that the distribution of CCPFs depends largely on habitat availability and intraspecific competition. Modeling these effects may therefore allow distributions to be estimated from samples of individual spatial usage. Such data can be obtained for an increasing number of species using tracking technology. However, techniques for estimating population-level distributions using the telemetry data are poorly developed. This is of concern because many marine CCPFs, such as seabirds, are threatened by anthropogenic activities. Here, we aim to estimate the distribution at sea of four seabird species, foraging from approximately 5,500 breeding sites in Britain and Ireland. To do so, we GPS-tracked a sample of 230 European Shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis, 464 Black-legged Kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla, 178 Common Murres Uria aalge, and 281 Razorbills Alca torda from 13, 20, 12, and 14 colonies, respectively. Using Poisson point process habitat use models, we show that distribution at sea is dependent on (1) density-dependent competition among sympatric conspecifics (all species) and parapatric conspecifics (Kittiwakes and Murres); (2) habitat accessibility and coastal geometry, such that birds travel further from colonies with limited access to the sea; and (3) regional habitat availability. Using these models, we predict space use by birds from unobserved colonies and thereby map the distribution at sea of each species at both the colony and regional level. Space use by all four species' British breeding populations is concentrated in the coastal waters of Scotland, highlighting the need for robust conservation measures in this area. The techniques we present are applicable to any CCPF.
© 2017 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Poisson point process; animal tracking; central-place foraging; coloniality; density dependence; habitat use; species distribution models

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28653410     DOI: 10.1002/eap.1591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  11 in total

1.  Taking movement data to new depths: Inferring prey availability and patch profitability from seabird foraging behavior.

Authors:  Marianna Chimienti; Thomas Cornulier; Ellie Owen; Mark Bolton; Ian M Davies; Justin M J Travis; Beth E Scott
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Comparing marine distribution maps for seabirds during the breeding season derived from different survey and analysis methods.

Authors:  Alex Sansom; Linda J Wilson; Richard W G Caldow; Mark Bolton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Identification of marine Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas for penguins around the South Shetland Islands and South Orkney Islands.

Authors:  Maria P Dias; Ana Paula Bertoldi Carneiro; Victoria Warwick-Evans; Colin Harris; Katharina Lorenz; Ben Lascelles; Harriet L Clewlow; Michael J Dunn; Jefferson T Hinke; Jeong-Hoon Kim; Nobuo Kokubun; Fabrizio Manco; Norman Ratcliffe; Mercedes Santos; Akinori Takahashi; Wayne Trivelpiece; Philip N Trathan
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Environmental heterogeneity decreases reproductive success via effects on foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Alice M Trevail; Jonathan A Green; Jonathan Sharples; Jeff A Polton; Peter I Miller; Francis Daunt; Ellie Owen; Mark Bolton; Kendrew Colhoun; Stephen Newton; Gail Robertson; Samantha C Patrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Important At-Sea Areas of Colonial Breeding Marine Predators on the Southern Patagonian Shelf.

Authors:  Alastair M M Baylis; Megan Tierney; Rachael A Orben; Victoria Warwick-Evans; Ewan Wakefield; W James Grecian; Phil Trathan; Ryan Reisinger; Norman Ratcliffe; John Croxall; Letizia Campioni; Paulo Catry; Sarah Crofts; P Dee Boersma; Filippo Galimberti; José P Granadeiro; Jonathan Handley; Sean Hayes; April Hedd; Juan F Masello; William A Montevecchi; Klemens Pütz; Petra Quillfeldt; Ginger A Rebstock; Simona Sanvito; Iain J Staniland; Paul Brickle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sympatric Atlantic puffins and razorbills show contrasting responses to adverse marine conditions during winter foraging within the North Sea.

Authors:  Katie St John Glew; Sarah Wanless; Michael P Harris; Francis Daunt; Kjell Einar Erikstad; Hallvard Strøm; John R Speakman; Benjamin Kürten; Clive N Trueman
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.600

7.  Rafting behaviour of seabirds as a proxy to describe surface ocean currents in the Balearic Sea.

Authors:  A Sánchez-Román; L Gómez-Navarro; R Fablet; D Oro; E Mason; J M Arcos; S Ruiz; A Pascual
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Ecological costs of climate change on marine predator-prey population distributions by 2050.

Authors:  Dinara Sadykova; Beth E Scott; Michela De Dominicis; Sarah L Wakelin; Judith Wolf; Alexander Sadykov
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Terrestrial or marine species distribution model: Why not both? A case study with seabirds.

Authors:  Henry Häkkinen; Silviu O Petrovan; William J Sutherland; Nathalie Pettorelli
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Taking a trip to the shelf: Behavioral decisions are mediated by the proximity to foraging habitats in the black-legged kittiwake.

Authors:  Signe Christensen-Dalsgaard; Roel May; Svein-Håkon Lorentsen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-10       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.