Jason B White1, Lina Y Hu1, David L Boucher1, Julie L Sutcliffe2,3,4,5. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA. jlsutcliffe@ucdavis.edu. 3. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. jlsutcliffe@ucdavis.edu. 4. Center for Molecular and Genomic Imaging, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA. jlsutcliffe@ucdavis.edu. 5. Radiochemistry Research and Training Facility, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. jlsutcliffe@ucdavis.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Increased expression of the αvβ6 integrin correlates with advanced tumor grade and poor clinical outcome, identifying αvβ6 as a prognostic indicator and an attractive target for molecular imaging. This work investigated the ability of a disulfide-stabilized [64Cu]NOTA-αvβ6 cys-diabody to image αvβ6 expression in vivo using a nu/nu mouse model bearing human melanoma xenografts and positron-emission tomography. PROCEDURES: Small-animal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, quantitative ROI analysis, and ex vivo biodistribution were conducted to ascertain tumor uptake and organ distribution of the [64Cu]NOTA-αvβ6 cys-diabody. Immunohistochemical staining of tumors and mouse organs and immunoreactivity assays were utilized to correlate in vivo and ex vivo observations. RESULTS: PET imaging of the [64Cu]NOTA-αvβ6 cys-diabody revealed low tumor uptake at 24 h p.i. in DX3Puroβ6 tumors (2.69 ± 0.45 %ID/g) with comparable results found in the DX3Puro tumors (2.24 ± 0.15 %ID/g). Quantitative biodistribution confirmed that DX3Puroβ6 tumor uptake was highest at 24 h p.i. (4.63 ± 0.18 %ID/g); however, uptake was also observed in the stomach (4.84 ± 2.99 %ID/g), small intestines (4.50 ± 1.69 %ID/g), large intestines (4.73 ± 0.97 %ID/g), gallbladder (6.04 ± 1.88 %ID/g), and lungs (3.89 ± 0.69 %ID/g). CONCLUSIONS: Small-animal PET imaging was successful in visualizing αvβ6-positive tumor uptake of the [64Cu]NOTA-αvβ6 cys-diabody. Cys-diabody cross-reactivity was observed between human and murine αvβ6 and immunohistochemical staining confirmed the presence of an endogenous αvβ6 antigen sink, which led to suboptimal tumor contrast in this mouse model. Future investigations will focus on dose escalation studies to overcome the endogenous antigen sink while increasing DX3Puroβ6 tumor uptake.
PURPOSE: Increased expression of the αvβ6 integrin correlates with advanced tumor grade and poor clinical outcome, identifying αvβ6 as a prognostic indicator and an attractive target for molecular imaging. This work investigated the ability of a disulfide-stabilized [64Cu]NOTA-αvβ6 cys-diabody to image αvβ6 expression in vivo using a nu/nu mouse model bearing humanmelanoma xenografts and positron-emission tomography. PROCEDURES: Small-animal positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, quantitative ROI analysis, and ex vivo biodistribution were conducted to ascertain tumor uptake and organ distribution of the [64Cu]NOTA-αvβ6 cys-diabody. Immunohistochemical staining of tumors and mouse organs and immunoreactivity assays were utilized to correlate in vivo and ex vivo observations. RESULTS: PET imaging of the [64Cu]NOTA-αvβ6 cys-diabody revealed low tumor uptake at 24 h p.i. in DX3Puroβ6 tumors (2.69 ± 0.45 %ID/g) with comparable results found in the DX3Puro tumors (2.24 ± 0.15 %ID/g). Quantitative biodistribution confirmed that DX3Puroβ6 tumor uptake was highest at 24 h p.i. (4.63 ± 0.18 %ID/g); however, uptake was also observed in the stomach (4.84 ± 2.99 %ID/g), small intestines (4.50 ± 1.69 %ID/g), large intestines (4.73 ± 0.97 %ID/g), gallbladder (6.04 ± 1.88 %ID/g), and lungs (3.89 ± 0.69 %ID/g). CONCLUSIONS: Small-animal PET imaging was successful in visualizing αvβ6-positive tumor uptake of the [64Cu]NOTA-αvβ6 cys-diabody. Cys-diabody cross-reactivity was observed between human and murine αvβ6 and immunohistochemical staining confirmed the presence of an endogenous αvβ6 antigen sink, which led to suboptimal tumor contrast in this mouse model. Future investigations will focus on dose escalation studies to overcome the endogenous antigen sink while increasing DX3Puroβ6 tumor uptake.
Authors: Paul H Weinreb; Kenneth J Simon; Paul Rayhorn; William J Yang; Diane R Leone; Brian M Dolinski; Bradley R Pearse; Yukako Yokota; Hisaaki Kawakatsu; Amha Atakilit; Dean Sheppard; Shelia M Violette Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2004-02-11 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Tove Olafsen; Vania E Kenanova; Gobalakrishnan Sundaresan; Anne-Line Anderson; Desiree Crow; Paul J Yazaki; Lin Li; Michael F Press; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Lawrence E Williams; Jeffrey Y C Wong; Andrew A Raubitschek; John E Shively; Anna M Wu Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jorge A Carrasquillo; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Joseph A O'Donoghue; John L Humm; Pat Zanzonico; Peter M Smith-Jones; Chaitanya R Divgi; Daniel A Pryma; Shutian Ruan; Nancy E Kemeny; Yuman Fong; Douglas Wong; Jaspreet S Jaggi; David A Scheinberg; Mithat Gonen; Katherine S Panageas; Gerd Ritter; Achim A Jungbluth; Lloyd J Old; Steven M Larson Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jeffrey V Leyton; Tove Olafsen; Mark A Sherman; Karl B Bauer; Patrick Aghajanian; Robert E Reiter; Anna M Wu Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: D Logan; R Abu-Ghazaleh; W Blakemore; S Curry; T Jackson; A King; S Lea; R Lewis; J Newman; N Parry Journal: Nature Date: 1993-04-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ajay N Singh; Michael J McGuire; Shunzi Li; Guiyang Hao; Amit Kumar; Xiankai Sun; Kathlynn C Brown Journal: Theranostics Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Eduardo Aluicio-Sarduy; Paul A Ellison; Todd E Barnhart; Weibo Cai; Robert Jerry Nickles; Jonathan W Engle Journal: J Labelled Comp Radiopharm Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 1.921