Laura Font1,2, Christa A Houck1, Christopher L Cunningham3. 1. Department of Behavioral Neuroscience and Portland Alcohol Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, L470, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA. 2. Area de Psicobiología, Universitat Jaume I, 12071, Castellón, Spain. 3. Department of Behavioral Neuroscience and Portland Alcohol Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, L470, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA. cunningh@ohsu.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Previous studies found that naloxone (NLX) facilitated choice extinction of ethanol conditioned place preference (CPP) using long (60 min) test sessions, but there is little information on the variables determining this effect. OBJECTIVES: These studies examined repeated exposure to NLX during extinction of ethanol- or cocaine-induced CPP using both short and long tests. METHODS: DBA/2J mice were injected with NLX (0 or 10 mg/kg) before three 10- or 60-min choice extinction tests (experiment 1). All mice received a final 60-min test without NLX. Post-test NLX was given in experiment 2. Experiment 3 tested whether NLX would affect a forced extinction procedure. Experiment 4 tested its effect on extinction of cocaine-induced CPP. RESULTS: Pre-test (but not post-test) injections of NLX-facilitated choice extinction of ethanol CPP at both test durations. Pre-test NLX also facilitated forced extinction. However, pre-test NLX had no effect on choice extinction of cocaine CPP. CONCLUSIONS: Extinction test duration is not critical for engaging the opioid system during ethanol CPP extinction (experiment 1). Moreover, NLX's effect does not depend on CPP expression during extinction, just exposure to previously conditioned cues (experiment 3). The null effect of post-test NLX eliminates a memory consolidation interpretation (experiment 2) and the failure to alter cocaine CPP extinction argues against alteration of general learning or memory processes (experiment 4). Overall, these data suggest that the endogenous opioid system mediates a conditioned motivational effect that normally maintains alcohol-induced seeking behavior, which may underlie the efficacy of opiate antagonists in the treatment of alcoholism.
RATIONALE: Previous studies found that naloxone (NLX) facilitated choice extinction of ethanol conditioned place preference (CPP) using long (60 min) test sessions, but there is little information on the variables determining this effect. OBJECTIVES: These studies examined repeated exposure to NLX during extinction of ethanol- or cocaine-induced CPP using both short and long tests. METHODS: DBA/2J mice were injected with NLX (0 or 10 mg/kg) before three 10- or 60-min choice extinction tests (experiment 1). All mice received a final 60-min test without NLX. Post-test NLX was given in experiment 2. Experiment 3 tested whether NLX would affect a forced extinction procedure. Experiment 4 tested its effect on extinction of cocaine-induced CPP. RESULTS: Pre-test (but not post-test) injections of NLX-facilitated choice extinction of ethanol CPP at both test durations. Pre-test NLX also facilitated forced extinction. However, pre-test NLX had no effect on choice extinction of cocaine CPP. CONCLUSIONS: Extinction test duration is not critical for engaging the opioid system during ethanol CPP extinction (experiment 1). Moreover, NLX's effect does not depend on CPP expression during extinction, just exposure to previously conditioned cues (experiment 3). The null effect of post-test NLX eliminates a memory consolidation interpretation (experiment 2) and the failure to alter cocaine CPP extinction argues against alteration of general learning or memory processes (experiment 4). Overall, these data suggest that the endogenous opioid system mediates a conditioned motivational effect that normally maintains alcohol-induced seeking behavior, which may underlie the efficacy of opiate antagonists in the treatment of alcoholism.
Authors: Jacob N Norris; Andrés M Pérez-Acosta; Leonardo A Ortega; Mauricio R Papini Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Robert Miranda; Lara Ray; Alexander Blanchard; Elizabeth K Reynolds; Peter M Monti; Thomas Chun; Alicia Justus; Robert M Swift; Jennifer Tidey; Chad J Gwaltney; Jason Ramirez Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Christopher L Cunningham; Lee Bakner; Lindsey M Schuette; Emily A Young Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2020-09-26 Impact factor: 4.530