Literature DB >> 28653051

Posterior indirect adhesive 
restorations: updated indications 
and the Morphology Driven 
Preparation Technique.

Marco Veneziani.   

Abstract

The aim of this article is to identify the indications for adhesively cemented restorations and to provide a correct step-by-step protocol for clinicians. New cavity preparation principles are based on morphological considerations in terms of geometry (maximum profile line and inclination of cusp lines), and structure (dentin concavity and enamel convexity). In this article, we discuss previous preparation concepts that were not designed purely for adhesive restorations and were therefore not conservative enough or suitable for adhesive procedures. The novel cavity shape consists of continuous inclined plane cavity margins (hollow chamfer or concave bevel) on axial walls, whenever they are coronal to the equatorial tooth line. A 1.2 mm-thick butt-joint preparation is performed in the interproximal box and on the axial walls when the margins are apical to the equatorial line. The occlusal surface is anatomically prepared, free of slots and angles. The author's suggestion is to avoid shoulder finish line preparation around cusps, occlusal slots, and pins, as they are less conservative, incompatible with adhesive procedures, and involve unnecessary dentin exposure. The clinical advantages of this new "anatomic" preparation design are 1) improving adhesion quality (optimizing the cutting of enamel prisms, and increasing the available enamel surface); 2) minimizing dentin exposure; 3) maximizing hard tissue preservation (the cavity being designed for cementation with reinforced composite resins, improvement of flow, and removal of excess material); 4) optimization of esthetic integration due to the inclined plane design, which permits a better blending at the transition area between tooth and restoration. These preparation principles may be effectively used for all adhesively cemented restorations, both according to traditional concepts (inlay, onlay, overlay) and new ones (additional overlay, occlusal-veneer, overlay-veneer, long-wrap overlay, adhesive crown). Thus, a balance between restoration and prosthodontics is created, which is characterized by a more conservative approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28653051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Esthet Dent


  4 in total

1.  Effect of cavity design and material type on fracture resistance and failure pattern of molars restored by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing inlays/onlays.

Authors:  Roqaia Mohammad Alassar; Amira Mohammad Samy; Fatma Mahmoud Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-03-17

2.  Four-Year Follow-up of Increased Vertical Dimension of Occlusion using Resin Composites.

Authors:  Cendrella Assaf; Jean Claude Fahd; Joseph Sabbagh
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2018-10-08

3.  Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns-5-year results.

Authors:  Sven Rinke; Tanja Zuck; Tim Hausdörfer; Andreas Leha; Torsten Wassmann; Dirk Ziebolz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Comparative evaluation of clinical performance of ceramic and resin inlays, onlays, and overlays: A systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Vishal B Naik; Ashish K Jain; Rahul D Rao; Balaram D Naik
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-07-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.