| Literature DB >> 28652934 |
Niluni M Wijesundara1, Satvir Sekhon-Loodu1, Hp Vasantha Rupasinghe1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pharyngitis is an inflammatory condition of the pharynx and associated structures commonly caused by the Group A streptococci (GAS). There is a growing interest in discovering plant-based anti-inflammatory compounds as potential alternatives to conventional drugs. This study evaluated anti-inflammatory activity of phytochemical-rich extracts prepared from 12 herbal plants using human tonsil epithelial cells (HTonEpiC) in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: Cytokines; Herbs; Lipoteichoic acid; Pain; Peptidoglycan; Streptococcal pharyngitis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28652934 PMCID: PMC5483044 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3469
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Major phytochemicals reported for the selected herbal plant parts used in this study.
| Plant name | Family | Parts used | Major phytochemicals | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barberry | Berberidaceae | R | Berberine, Berbamine, 5-Methoxyhydnocarpin, Berlambine, Jatrorrhizine, Palmatine, Quercetin, Rutin and Oxyberberine | |
| Clove ( | Myrtaceae | FB | Eugenol, Eugenyl acetate, β-Caryophyllene, | |
| Echinacea/purple cone flower ( | Asteraceae | L | Caftaric acid, Chlorogenic acid, Caffeic acid, Cynarin, Echinacoside, Cichoric acid, Quercetin and Kaempferol | |
| S | ||||
| F | ||||
| Geranium ( | Geraniaceae | L | Citronellol, Citronellyl formate and Geraniol | |
| Ginger ( | Zingiberaceae | Rh | Gingerol, Galanolactone, Ginerdiol, Geranial, | |
| Licorice ( | Fabaceae | R | Glycyrrhizin, Glabridin, Liquirtin, Licoflavan, Narigenin and Asparegene | |
| Olive ( | Oleaceae | L | Hydroxytyrosol, Luteolin-7-O-glucoside, Luteolin-4-O-glucoside, Oleuropein, and Hydroxytyrosol acetate | |
| Oregano ( | Lamiaceae | FS | Carvacrol, p-Cymene, Borneol, Thymol, Linalool, Linlyl acetate, Terpinene-4-ol, Rosmarinic acid, Thymohydroquinone and Naringin | |
| Sage ( | Lamiaceae | L | 1,8-Cineole, p-Cymene, Camphor, borneol, | |
| Danshen ( | Lamiaceae | R | danshensu, protocatechuic aldehyde, salvianolic acid B, cryptotanshinone, tanshinone I and tanshinone IIa | |
| Slippery elm | Ulmaceae | IB | Oleanolic acid, Ursolic acid, Uvaol, Betulinic acid, Botulin, β-Arotene, β-Sitosterol and Citrostadienol | |
| Thyme ( | Lamiaceae | FS | Thymol, |
Notes.
flowers
flowering buds
inner bark
flowering shoots
rhizome
roots
leaves
stem
Extraction yield, total phenolic content, and total carotenoids content of the examined plant extracts.
| Plant name | Parts used | Extract yield (%) (DW basis) | Total phenolics (mg GAE/g DW) | Total carotenoids (µg/g DW) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barberry | R | 1.9 ± 0.0g | 5.9 ± 0.1e | 2.6 ± 0.05f | 2.3 ± 0.1e | 494.9 ± 4.0e | 31.6 ± .7e |
| Clove | FB | 21.3 ± 1.2b | 24.6 ± 0.4bcd | 19.1 ± 0.0a | 16.0 ± 0.2a | 92.1 ± 0.2hi | NA |
| Echinacea | L | 7.1 ± 0.3efg | 31.5 ± 1.7a | 1.7 ± 0.0fg | 2.1 ± 0.1e | 6248.8 ± 11.6a | 24.3 ± 0.9ef |
| S | 5.6 ± 0.0fg | 18.9 ± 0.4cd | 1.1 ± 0.3g | 1.2 ± 0.1f | 388.0 ± 3.7f | 147.0 ± 2.1d | |
| F | 6.8 ± 0.1efg | 20.3 ± 1.3d | 1.0 ± 0.0g | 2.6 ± 0.1e | 292.6 ± 0.6g | 2.0 ± 0.0h | |
| Geranium | L | 9.3 ± 0.1def | 29.0 ± 2.2ab | 7.1 ± 0.4cd | 10.6 ± 0.3b | 2505.8 ± 8.4b | 18.6 ± 3.4fg |
| Ginger | Rh | 19.6 ± 0.9bc | 19.9 ± 0.7d | 6.9 ± 0.5cd | 0.5 ± 0.4f | 455.0 ± 19.7ef | 7.8 ± 0.2gh |
| Licorice | R | 39.0 ± 1.9a | 19.5 ± 0.2d | 4.6 ± 0.0e | 2.8 ± 0.1e | 157.4 ± 3.9h | 237.3 ± 0.4c |
| Olive | L | 22.2 ± 2.7bc | 24.2 ± 2.3bcd | 5.3 ± 0.0e | 5.7 ± 0.2c | 235.6 ± 2.3g | 677.6 ± 4.2a |
| Oregano | FS | 14.5 ± 0.5cd | 8.2 ± 0.2e | 9.2 ± 0.5b | 9.8 ± 0.1b | 2032.4 ± 24.7d | 10.6 ± 0.3gh |
| Sage | L | 8.9 ± 0.9def | 19.8 ± 1.1d | 5.2 ± 0.1e | 4.1 ± 0.1d | 2066.9 ± 11.8d | 25.9 ± 1.0ef |
| Danshen | R | NA | NA | 10.0 ± 0.5b | NA | NA | NA |
| Slippery elm | IB | 7.6 ± 0.3ef | 7.1 ± 0.1e | 7.5 ± 0.1c | 1.9 ± 0.1e | 72.7 ± 6.2i | 400.5 ± 3.5b |
| Thyme | FS | 10.5 ± 0.4de | 18.6 ± 1.1d | 6.0 ± 0.2de | 5.1 ± 0.1c | 2373.2 ± 27.7c | 401.5 ± 4.9b |
Notes.
Means ± SEM (n = 3) of different extracts analyzed individually in triplicate. Different superscript letters within the same column indicate significant differences of means among extraction solvents used in the study.
aqueous extracts
dry weight of extracts
ethanol extracts
Gallic acid equivalents
not analyzed
Toluene equivalents
flowers
flowering buds
inner bark
flowering shoots
rhizome
roots
leaves
stem
Effect of concentration of the extracts on percentage viability of human tonsil epithelial cells.
| Test materials | Cell viability (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 µg/mL | 1 µg/mL | 5 µg/mL | ||||
| Licorice R | 96.4 ± 0.9a | 99.1 ± 0.9a | 97.1 ± 0.5a | 98.0 ± 0.9a | 80.7 ± 1.0c | 98.4 ± 0.9a |
| Sage L | 98.7 ± 0.6a | 99.8 ± 0.2a | 98.7 ± 0.5a | 96.2 ± 3.4a | 89.4 ± 2.9b | 86.2 ± 0.6c |
| Echinacea S | 97.8 ± 0.6a | 82.8 ± 2.1c | 98.0 ± 0.5a | 95.8 ± 2.1a | 84.2 ± 2.0c | 83.0 ± 1.2c |
| Echinacea F | 98.2 ± 0.3a | 97.1 ± 1.2a | 98.1 ± 0.0a | 96.1 ± 1.7a | 99.1 ± 1.8a | 97.1 ± 0.6a |
| Oregano FS | 99.3 ± 1.1a | 96.9 ± 1.1a | 97.1 ± 0.0a | 96.9 ± 0.6a | 97.4 ± 0.6a | 86.9 ± 0.6.c |
| Thyme FS | 99.1 ± 0.6a | 95.6 ± 1.8ab | 96.1 ± 0.6a | 96.6 ± 1.8ab | 98.9 ± 0.5a | 95.6 ± 1.2a |
| Barberry R | 98.1 ± 0.6a | 97.5 ± 0.4a | 97.0 ± 0.7a | 95.5 ± 0.2ab | 96.0 ± 0.3a | 97.5 ± 0.6a |
| Slippery elm IB | 99.0 ± 0.8a | 93.4 ± 0.6b | 97.0 ± 0.6a | 89.7 ± 0.6b | 97.6 ± 1.1a | 82.7 ± 0.6c |
| Clove FB | 98.4 ± 0.0a | 97.5 ± 1.1a | 98.9 ± 0.2a | 96.5 ± 1.1ab | 98.3 ± 0.6a | 97.5 ± 0.7a |
| Ginger Rh | 98.1 ± 0.0a | 98.9 ± 0.3a | 98.4 ± 0.5a | 98.9 ± 0.9a | 98.7 ± 0.3a | 98.9 ± 0.7a |
| Olive L | 97.0 ± 0.9a | 96.8 ± 0.9ab | 96.0 ± 0.9a | 98.8 ± 0.9a | 96.2 ± 0.6a | 98.8 ± 1.2a |
| Geranium L | 98.2 ± 0.7a | 85.1 ± 1.1c | 99.0 ± 0.6a | 46.1 ± 1.1de | 93.1 ± 0.6ab | 41.1 ± 0.0e |
| Echinacea L | 98.0 ± 0.8a | 97.3 ± 0.8a | 96.3 ± 0.9a | 97.9 ± 0.9a | 97.1 ± 0.75a | 97.9 ± 0.3a |
| Danshen R | ND | 95.9 ± 0.6ab | ND | 98.9 ± 0.6a | ND | 98.9 ± 0.6a |
| Nimesulide | 98.0 ± 0.9a | 97.4 ± 0.5a | 98.1 ± 0.8a | 95.8 ± 1.0ab | 96.0 ± 0.6a | 95.8 ± 1.0ab |
Notes.
Cells were treated with various concentrations of the test materials for 24 h. Cell viability (%) was calculated relative to the control of 0.05% DMSO. Values of the same column are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3).
The value with different letters indicates the significant difference determined by Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05).
not determined
flowers
flower bud
flowering shoots
inner bark
leaves
rhizome
roots
stem
Figure 1Morphology of inflammation-induced tonsil epithelial cells treated with the ethanol extracts.
The LTA + PGN-induced cells were incubated with 5 µg/mL of the extracts for 24 h. All images were obtained at a magnification of ×40. (A) Media control; (B) 0.05% DMSO control; (C) 10 µg/mL LTA and PGN; (D) Licorice root; (E) Sage leaves; (F) Echinacea stem; (G) Echinacea flower; (H) Oregano shoots; (I) Thyme shoots; (J) Barberry root; (K) Slippery elm inner bark; (L) Clove flower bud; (M) Ginger rhizome; (N) Olive leaves; (O) Geranium leaves; (P) Echinacea leaves; (Q) Danshen root and (R) Nimesulide.
Figure 2Morphology of inflammation-induced tonsil epithelial cells treated with the aqueous extracts.
The LTA + PGN-induced cells were incubated with 5 µg/mL of the extracts for 24 h. All images were obtained at a magnification of ×40. (A) Media control; (B) 0.05% DMSO control; (C) 10 µg/mL LTA and PGN; (D) Licorice root; (E) Sage leaves; (F) Echinacea stem; (G) Echinacea flower; (H) Oregano shoots; (I) Thyme shoots; (J) Barberry root; (K) Slippery elm inner bark; (L) Clove flower bud; (M) Ginger rhizome; (N) Olive leaves; (O) Geranium leaves; (P) Echinacea leaves and (Q) Nimesulide.
Figure 3Secretion of pro-inflammatory proteins by tonsil epithelial cells treated with the ethanol extracts.
The inflammation of human tonsil epithelial cells was stimulated by a mixture of LTA + PGN, and then incubated with selected phytochemical-rich ethanol extracts. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Groups sharing different letters showed a significant difference (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05). IL-8, interleukin-8; hBD-2, human beta defensin-2; GCP-2, granulocyte chemotactic protein-2; ENA-78, epithelial-derived neutrophil activating protein-78; LTA, lipoteichoic acid; PGN, peptidoglycan; F, flowers; FB, flower bud; FS, flowering shoots; IB, inner bark; L, leaves; Rh, rhizome; R, roots; S, stem.
Figure 4Secretion of pro-inflammatory proteins by tonsil epithelial cells treated with the aqueous extracts.
The inflammation of human tonsil epithelial cells was stimulated by a mixture of LTA + PGN, and then incubated with selected phytochemical-rich ethanol extracts. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Groups sharing different letters showed a significant difference (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05). IL-8, interleukin-8; hBD-2, human beta defensin-2; GCP-2, granulocyte chemotactic protein-2; ENA-78, epithelial-derived neutrophil activating protein-78; LTA, lipoteichoic acid; PGN, peptidoglycan; F, flowers; FB, flower bud; FS, flowering shoots; IB, inner bark; L, leaves; Rh, rhizome; R, roots; S, stem.