| Literature DB >> 28652853 |
Pravin Kumar1, Devyani Swami1, Hitendra N Karade2, Manindar Singh3, Anupma Tiwari1, Kshetra Pal Singh1.
Abstract
The available antidotal therapy against acute poisoning by organophosphates involves the use of atropine alone or in combination with one of the oximes, e.g. 2-PAM, Obidoxime, TMB-4 or HI-6. Each of these oximes has some limitation, raising the question of the universal antidotal efficacy against poisoning by all OPs/nerve agents. In the present study, newly synthesized bis quaternary 2-(hydroxyimino)-N-(pyridin-3yl) acetamide derivatives (HNK-series) oximes were evaluated for their antidotal efficacy against DDVP intoxicated Swiss mice, in terms of the Protection Index (PI) and AChE reactivation in brain and serum. The inhibition concentration (IC50) was determined in brain and serum after optimizing the time point for maximum inhibition (60 min post DDVP exposure). AChE reactivation efficacy of the HNK series was evaluated at IC50 and compared with 2-PAM. HNK-102 showed a ~2 times better Protection Index (PI) as compared to 2-PAM against DDVP toxicity. IC50 at 60 min DDVP post exposure was found to be approximately one fifth and one half of the LD50 dose for brain and serum AChE, respectively. Out of three HNK oximes, HNK-102 & 106 at 0.20 LD50 dose significantly reactivated DDVP intoxicated brain AChE (p<0.05) as compared to 2-PAM at double IC50 dose of DDVP. In light of double PI and higher AChE reactivation, HNK 102 was found to be a better oxime than 2-PAM in the treatment of acute poisoning by DDVP.Entities:
Keywords: 2-PAM; AChE reactivation; DDVP; HNK Oximes
Year: 2017 PMID: 28652853 PMCID: PMC5464681 DOI: 10.1515/intox-2016-0013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Toxicol ISSN: 1337-6853
Figure 1Bis-quaternary 2-(hydroxyimino)-N-(pyridine-3-yl)acetamide derivatives.
In vivo protection offered by atropine and oximes (2-PAM, HNK-102, HNK-106 and HNK-111) against DDVP.
| S.No | Treatment | LD50 DDVP (mg/kg, sc) | No. of Experiments (n) | PI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atropine (mg/kg, ip) | Oxime (mg/kg, im) | ||||
| 1. | - | - | 14.14 | 4 | 1 |
| 2. | 10.00 | - | 20.0 | 1 | 1.41 |
| 3. | 10.00 | PAM (30.00) | 48.23±8.33 | 2 | 3.41 |
| 4. | 10.00 | HNK–102 (56.56) | 81.49±18.5 | 3 | 5.76 |
| 5. | 10.00 | HNK–106 (7.00) | 30.17±5.17 | 3 | 2.13 |
| 6. | 10.00 | HNK–111 (7.00) | 35.35±0.0 | 3 | 2.5 |
LD50 determined following the ‘Moving Average’ method of Gad and Weil (1989). The treatment doses of HNK-102, HNK-106 and HNK-111 are corresponding to their 0.20 LD50. Values in column 3 are (i) Mean±SEM with 4 animals in each experiment (ii) in parenthesis are the 95% confidence limits.
Figure 2Inhibition of brain and serum AChE induced by 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 LD50 of DDVP 15 min post exposure in mice. Each point represents mean±SEM (n=4).
Figure 3DDVP IC50 for brain and serum AChE activity at 60 min post exposure in mice. Each point represents mean ± SEM (n=4). Brain: Y= 122.2X + 23.39; r2= 0.91; IC50 = 0.217 LD50 (3.05 mg/kg). Serum: Y= 59.8 X + 10.0; r2= 0.93; IC50 = 0.66 LD50 (9.431 mg/kg)
Figure 4Reactivation of DDVP inhibited brain AChE activity by oximes at 0.108 LD50 (0.5 IC50), 0.217 LD50 (IC50) and 0.434 LD50 (2 IC50) doses 60 minutes post exposure. Doses: HNK oximes 0.2 LD50; 2- PAM 30 mg/kg; DDVP LD50 14.14 mg/kg. Each bar represents mean ± SEM (n=4). *p<0.001, compared to HNK-106; #p<0.01 0r less, compared to DDVP and 2-PAM.