| Literature DB >> 28652777 |
Bikang Yang1, Xuebing Yan2, Liguo Liu3, Chunyu Jiang4, Shuping Hou1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cancer stem cells have recently been identified as a key driving factor for tumor metastasis and chemoresistance. CD117 is a well-established cancer stem cell marker, but its clinical significance in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to identify correlations between CD117 expression and clinical features and outcomes in EOC patients in this meta-analysis.Entities:
Keywords: CD117; cancer stem cell; epithelial ovarian cancer; prognosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28652777 PMCID: PMC5476715 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S136549
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Figure 1Flowchart of the literature search process.
Characteristics of the included studies
| Study | No of patients | Country | Age (years) | Follow-up (months) | Histologic type | FIGO stage | Cutoff | Method | CD117 high/low | Survival analysis | HR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayub et al, | 55 | Germany | 55±8.9 | 44.81 (17.01–72.61) | S55 | III 45 IV10 | NA | IHC | NA | OS | 1.17 (0.97–1.42) |
| Huang et al, | 242 | Norway | 58 (19–89) | 0–348 | S163M | I+II 46 | 10% | IHC | 22/220 | OS | 1.78 (1.09–2.89) |
| Conic et al, | 240 | Serbia | NA | NA | S178 M | I48 II20 | 25% | IHC | 66/174 | OS | 1.36 (0.88–2.10) |
| Lassus et al, | 516 | Finland | NA | 0–420 | S516 | I108 II64 | NA | IHC | 63/453 | OS | 2.34 (1.71–3.19) |
| Brustmann | 41 | Austria | 68 (37–81) | 0–200 | S41 | I17 II12 III12 | NA | IHC | 30/11 | OS | 1.62 (0.52–5.10) |
| Tonary et al, | 35 | Canada | NA | 24 (0–50) | S25 M | I4 III27 IV4 | NA | IHC | 25/10 | OS | 0.92 (0.32–2.65) |
| Khalifeh et al, | 118 | USA | 63 (38–89) | 16.6 (0.5–71.37) | S118 | III97 IV21 | NA | IHC | 25/93 | OS | 0.81 (0.48–1.39) |
Note: Age presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (range).
Abbreviations: FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; NA, not available; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; S, serous carcinoma; M1, mucinous carcinoma; E, endometrioid carcinoma; C, clear cell carcinoma; U, undifferentiated carcinoma; M2, mixed carcinoma; O, others; IHC, immunohistochemistry.
Figure 2Forest plots of ORs for correlations between CD117 expression and clinicopathological parameters.
Notes: ORs for the correlations between CD117 expression and (A) age, (B) FIGO stage, (C) differentiation grade, and (D) histological type. X-axis: OR (95% CI).
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Correlations between CD117 expression and clinicopathological parameters
| Clinical variables | Number of studies | Pooled OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (≥60 years vs <60 years) | 2 | 1.67 (1.05–2.66) | 0.063 | 71.0 |
| FIGO stage (III/IV vs I/II) | 5 | 1.99 (1.31–3.02) | 0.519 | 0.00 |
| Differentiation grade (poor vs well) | 5 | 2.46 (1.48–4.10) | 0.008 | 71.2 |
| Histological type (serous vs mixed) | 3 | 1.85 (1.05–3.26) | 0.212 | 35.6 |
Abbreviations: FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3Forest plots of HRs for the correlations between CD117 expression and patient prognosis.
Notes: HRs for the correlations between CD117 expression and (A) overall survival and (B) disease-free survival. X-axis: HR (95% CI).
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Prognostic significance of CD117 in subgroup analysis
| Variables | Subgroup | No of studies | No of patients | HR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnicity | Europe | 5 | 1,094 | 1.59 (1.13–2.23) | 72.8 | 0.005 |
| Non-Europe | 2 | 153 | 0.83 (0.52–1.34) | 0.00 | 0.833 | |
| Age (years) | ≥60 | 2 | 159 | 0.95 (0.54–1.67) | 14.1 | 0.281 |
| <60 | 4 | 1,053 | 1.59 (1.10–2.30) | 79.5 | 0.002 | |
| Sample size | ≥200 | 3 | 998 | 1.84 (1.32–2.56) | 50.6 | 0.132 |
| <200 | 4 | 249 | 1.13 (0.95–1.34) | 0.00 | 0.540 | |
| Histological type | Serous | 4 | 730 | 1.37 (0.84–2.24) | 83.1 | 0.000 |
| Mixed | 3 | 517 | 1.47 (1.08–2.00) | 0.00 | 0.480 |
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4Begg’s funnel plots (with pseudo 95% confidence limits) for evaluating publication bias in analyses of clinical features and outcomes. Notes: Publication bias for (A) age, (B) FIGO stage, (C) differentiation grade, (D) histological type, (E) OS, and (F) DFS analyses.
Abbreviations: FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival.
Egger’s test of funnel plot asymmetry
| Variables | Degrees of freedom | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall survival | 0.11 | 6 | 0.91 |
| Disease-free survival | 0.05 | 2 | 0.96 |
| FIGO stage | 0.85 | 4 | 0.45 |
| Differentiation grade | 0.05 | 4 | 0.96 |
| Histological type | 0.13 | 2 | 0.91 |
Abbreviation: FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Figure 5Sensitivity analyses of the studies assessing overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B).