Literature DB >> 28652678

Pectus excavatum: Right ventricular compromise with orthostatic syndrome and Brugada phenocopy.

Eftychios Siniorakis1, Spyridon Arvanitakis1, Panagiotis Tzevelekos1, Stamatia Panta1, Apostolos Balanis1, Fotini Aivalioti1, Sotiria Limberi1.   

Abstract

Pectus excavatum (PEXT) consists of an overgrowth of the chondral region with posterior displacement of the inferior part of the sternum, resulting in a concave chest deformity. Characteristic clinical and imaging findings may occur, depending on the compression that right cardiac chambers suffer, when squeezed between the sternum and the column vertebrae.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brugada phenocopy; Orthostatic syndrome; Pectus excavatum; Ravitch procedure; Right ventricular compression

Year:  2017        PMID: 28652678      PMCID: PMC5475344          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2017.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc        ISSN: 1016-7315


Pectus excavatum (PEXT) or funnel chest is an anterior chest congenital deformity, predominantly manifesting in male patients, with an incidence of 1 in every 300–400 births. It consists of an overgrowth of the chondral region with posterior displacement of the inferior part of the sternum, resulting in a concave chest deformity [1], [2]. Although PEXT is viewed as a benign condition with mainly cosmetic interest, characteristic clinical and imaging findings may occur, depending on the compression that right cardiac chambers suffer, when squeezed between the sternum and the column vertebrae [3], [4]. A 23-year-old man (height 1.83 cm, weight 68 kg, body surface area 1.90 m2) presented for a routine cardiac examination, prior to undergoing surgical correction of his PEXT (Fig. 1A). Although his main intention was to get relief from cosmetic embarrassment, he was not completely free of symptoms. He reported exertional dyspnea, atypical chest discomfort, reduced endurance, and frequent orthostatic hypotension episodes. His past medical history and family history were clear. In particular, there was no record of syncope or sudden cardiac death.
Figure 1

Constrictive pathophysiology of pectus excavatum on imaging. (A) Pectus excavatum provoking a squeezing of the right ventricle and abnormal motion of the interventricular septum, compatible with a constrictive pathophysiology, as seen on (B) echocardiography (arrow). (C) Magnetic resonance shows a filiform right ventricular outflow tract (arrow). LV = left ventricle; IVS = interventricular septum; I = inspiration; E = expiration.

Constrictive pathophysiology of pectus excavatum on imaging. (A) Pectus excavatum provoking a squeezing of the right ventricle and abnormal motion of the interventricular septum, compatible with a constrictive pathophysiology, as seen on (B) echocardiography (arrow). (C) Magnetic resonance shows a filiform right ventricular outflow tract (arrow). LV = left ventricle; IVS = interventricular septum; I = inspiration; E = expiration. Clinical examination in the supine position was unremarkable, apart from PEXT. On standing upright symptomatic orthostatic syndrome was noted, consisting of a fall in systolic blood pressure by 50 mmHg, an increase of his heart rate by 30% and concomitant dizziness and near-fainting. An enlarged cardiac silhouette was evident in the chest X-ray with leftward displacement of the heart. The usual laboratory blood tests including electrolytes and arterial blood gases were normal. His electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm with right axis deviation and leads V1–V2 depicted an rSR pattern with down-sloping ST segment and negative T waves (Fig. 2A). In lead V3, he had bifid T waves with a prominent late component. P waves in V1 were negative, a common finding in many PEXT cases. Given that his ECG picture was mimicking Brugada phenocopy, intravenous procainamide was administered to unmask a possible true Brugada substrate. This did not provoke any ECG changes.
Figure 2

Brugada phenocopy of pectus excavatum patient. Electrocardiograms (A) before surgical correction, mimicking a Brugada phenocopy, and (B) attenuated after operation.

Brugada phenocopy of pectus excavatum patient. Electrocardiograms (A) before surgical correction, mimicking a Brugada phenocopy, and (B) attenuated after operation. Transthoracic echocardiography showed compression of the right atrium and right ventricle (RV), with reduced tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. Short axis M-mode imaging (Fig. 1B) revealed a sudden pulling of the interventricular septum towards the anterior chest wall at the onset of diastole, causing almost total obliteration of the RV cavity. This was evident in inspiration as well as expiration, resulting in a constrictive pathophysiology. Potential intracavitary pressure gradients were not recorded due to positional deformities of the RV. Imaging and function of the great vessels, left heart cavities, and valves was normal. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed squeezing of the RV outflow tract with reduced RV ejection fraction at 48% (Fig. 1C). The sternovertebral distance was 2.40 cm, resulting in a Haller index (transverse diameter of the chest divided by the anteroposterior diameter) of 3.80 (normal values around 2.50). Six months after the uneventful surgical correction of his chest deformity, by a Ravitch procedure, he was reassessed. His symptoms were no longer present and his orthostatic syndrome could not be reproduced any more. His ECG findings in leads V3 and V4 were attenuated (Fig. 2B) although negative P waves in leads V1-V2 persisted. RV was decompressed on ECG, with normal tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and RV ejection fraction had risen to 56% on MRI. The sternovertebral distance was increased to 5.10 cm, resulting in a Haller index of 2.0. Several clinical implications can be deduced from the case described here. PEXT is not of esthetic concern only. Potential hemodynamic consequences related to the compression of cardiac chambers should be estimated cautiously, starting with a thorough clinical examination and proceeding with echocardiography and MRI if necessary [5], [6], [7]. Symptoms like orthostatic hypotension can be related to a reduced venous return in an already compromised RV, especially in several positional changes of the patient [8]. Common vasovagal episodes should be differentiated from syncopal episodes, especially if the ECG displays a Brugada phenocopy [9], [10]. In this respect, provocation tests with sodium channel blockers, as well as the absence of a family history of sudden cardiac death can be useful in excluding Brugada syndrome [11], [12]. Cardiac imaging by echocardiography is mandatory, to exclude hemodynamic derangement. Surgical correction of PEXT performed in centers with accrued experience is expected to ameliorate the clinical and imaging characteristics of the disease, although this is not always possible [13], [14]. ECG abnormalities may persist, probably due to the chronicity of the disease. PEXT is an intriguing congenital condition. A multidisciplinary approach including cardiologists, pneumonologists, and thoracic surgeons is bound to uncover further aspects of the deformity, streamlining a holistic and individualized therapeutic strategy.
  14 in total

1.  Syncope caused by right ventricular obstruction by pectus excavatum.

Authors:  Suzanne Borrhomée; Marien Lenoir; Marielle Gouton; Elie Fadel
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Differential diagnosis of rSr' pattern in leads V1 -V2. Comprehensive review and proposed algorithm.

Authors:  Adrian Baranchuk; Andres Enriquez; Javier García-Niebla; Antoni Bayés-Genís; Roger Villuendas; Antoni Bayés de Luna
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Brugada syndrome and Brugada phenocopy. The importance of a differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Gregory Dendramis
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Impact of surgical correction of pectus excavatum on cardiac function: insights on the right ventricle. A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study†.

Authors:  Agnieszka Töpper; Susanne Polleichtner; Anja Zagrosek; Marcel Prothmann; Julius Traber; Carsten Schwenke; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Klaus Schaarschmidt; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-20

5.  Pectus excavatum: echocardiography and cardiac MRI reveal frequent pericardial effusion and right-sided heart anomalies.

Authors:  S Oezcan; C H Attenhofer Jost; M Pfyffer; C Kellenberger; R Jenni; C Binggeli; A Faeh-Gunz; B Seifert; C Scharf; O Kretschmar; E R Valsangiacomo Buechel
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Symptomatic pectus excavatum in seniors (SPES): a cardiovascular problem? : A prospective cardiological study of 42 senior patients with a symptomatic pectus excavatum.

Authors:  H A Kragten; J Siebenga; P F Höppener; R Verburg; N Visker
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 7.  Brugada phenocopy in a patient with pectus excavatum: systematic review of the ECG manifestations associated with pectus excavatum.

Authors:  Sara F M Awad; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Lucia de Sousa Belem; Camila Pinto Cavalcante; Andrés Ricardo Pérez Riera; Javier Garcia-Niebla; Daniel D Anselm; Adrian Baranchuk
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Severe hypotension associated with the prone position in a child with scoliosis and pectus excavatum undergoing posterior spinal fusion.

Authors:  Blane T Bafus; Devi Chiravuri; Mary E van der Velde; Benjamin I Chu; Ronald Hirshl; Frances A Farley
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-08

Review 9.  Cardiac function before and after surgery for pectus excavatum.

Authors:  Warren G Guntheroth; Philip S Spiers
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with pectus excavatum compared with normal controls.

Authors:  Roya S Saleh; J Paul Finn; Michael Fenchel; Abbas Nasirae Moghadam; Mayil Krishnam; Marlon Abrazado; Anthony Ton; Reza Habibi; Eric W Fonkalsrud; Christopher B Cooper
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.