C Sh Ho1, S Y Wong2, M M Chiu3, R Cm Ho1. 1. Department of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Applied Social Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Elder abuse is increasingly recognised as a global public health and social problem. There has been limited inter-study comparison of the prevalence and risk factors for elder abuse. This study aimed to estimate the pooled and subtype prevalence of elder abuse worldwide and identify significant associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis and meta-regression of 34 population-based and 17 non-population-based studies. RESULTS: The pooled prevalences of elder abuse were 10.0% (95% confidence interval, 5.2%-18.6%) and 34.3% (95% confidence interval, 22.9%-47.8%) in population-based studies and third party- or caregiver-reported studies, respectively. Being in a marital relationship was found to be a significant moderator using random-effects model. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed that third parties or caregivers were more likely to report abuse than older abused adults. Subgroup analyses showed that females and those resident in non-western countries were more likely to be abused. Emotional abuse was the most prevalent elder abuse subtype and financial abuse was less commonly reported by third parties or caregivers. Heterogeneity in the prevalence was due to the high proportion of married older adults in the sample. Subgroup analysis showed that cultural factors, subtypes of abuse, and gender also contributed to heterogeneity in the pooled prevalence of elder abuse.
OBJECTIVE: Elder abuse is increasingly recognised as a global public health and social problem. There has been limited inter-study comparison of the prevalence and risk factors for elder abuse. This study aimed to estimate the pooled and subtype prevalence of elder abuse worldwide and identify significant associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis and meta-regression of 34 population-based and 17 non-population-based studies. RESULTS: The pooled prevalences of elder abuse were 10.0% (95% confidence interval, 5.2%-18.6%) and 34.3% (95% confidence interval, 22.9%-47.8%) in population-based studies and third party- or caregiver-reported studies, respectively. Being in a marital relationship was found to be a significant moderator using random-effects model. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed that third parties or caregivers were more likely to report abuse than older abused adults. Subgroup analyses showed that females and those resident in non-western countries were more likely to be abused. Emotional abuse was the most prevalent elder abuse subtype and financial abuse was less commonly reported by third parties or caregivers. Heterogeneity in the prevalence was due to the high proportion of married older adults in the sample. Subgroup analysis showed that cultural factors, subtypes of abuse, and gender also contributed to heterogeneity in the pooled prevalence of elder abuse.
Authors: Baran Akagunduz; Zeynep Altın; Muhammed Mustafa Atcı; Muhammet Ozer; Deniz Can Güven; İbrahim Çil; Fatih Özçiçek; Levent Demirtaş; Eren Duzgun; Azad Gunderci; Yusuf Arslan Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 3.603