Literature DB >> 28651960

Humid versus dry incubator: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Mohamed Fawzy1, Mohamed Y AbdelRahman2, Mohamed H Zidan3, Faten F Abdel Hafez4, Hazem Abdelghafar2, Hesham Al-Inany5, Mohamed A Bedaiwy6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a dry versus humidified incubator on human embryo development ex vivo.
DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: Private fertility centers. PATIENT(S): A total of 297 women undergoing in vitro fertilization randomized into two groups. INTERVENTION(S): From days 0 to day 5 or 6 of culture, intervention group embryos exposed to dry culture and control group embryos exposed to humidified culture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Subsequent ongoing pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): After transfer of embryos, there were statistically significantly lower rates of clinical and ongoing pregnancy in the dry culture arm than in the humidified culture arm (odds ratio [OR] 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.91; versus OR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.85). On day 3 of culture, embryo quality and compaction were lower in the dry culture group (OR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.32-0.45) than in the group exposed to humidified culture (OR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.19-0.27). On day 5 of culture, embryos in dry culture had a lower rate of blastocyst formation (OR 0.39; 95% CI, 0.33-0.46), quality (OR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.29-0.40), and cryopreservation (OR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.35-0.48). CONCLUSION(S): In this study, human embryos cultivated ex vivo in a dry incubator had statistically significantly decreased implantation and clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates. Our findings indicate the need for larger multicenter, randomized, controlled trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01695096.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryo culture; incubator humidity; in vitro fertilization laboratory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28651960     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

Review 1.  Considerations Regarding Embryo Culture Conditions: From Media to Epigenetics.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Anna Rapani; Polina Giannelou; George Anifandis; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Maria Lambropoulou; Athanasios Pappas; Efthimios Deligeoroglou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Duration of dry and humidified incubation of single-step embryo culture medium and oxygen tension during sham culture do not alter medium composition.

Authors:  Aswathi Cheredath; Shubhashree Uppangala; Gitanjali Asampille; Vani Lakshmi R; David Joseph; Keyur Raval; Nagana Gowda G A; Guruprasad Kalthur; Satish Kumar Adiga
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 3.  The unknown human trophectoderm: implication for biopsy at the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Angelo Tocci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  A novel embryo quality scoring system to compare groups of embryos at different developmental stages.

Authors:  Satoshi Mizuno; Hiroshi Matsumoto; Shu Hashimoto; Manjula Brahmajosyula; Aya Ohgaki; Sachiyo Tarui; Mari Matoba; Manabu Satoh; Aisaku Fukuda; Yoshiharu Morimoto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Creation, effects on embryo quality, and clinical outcomes of a new embryo culture medium with 31 optimized components derived from human oviduct fluid: A prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Takafumi Utsunomiya; Tatsuma Yao; Hiroko Itoh; Yufuko Kai; Yoko Kumasako; Miwa Setoguchi; Naomi Nakagata; Hiroyuki Abe; Motoharu Ishikawa; Koichi Kyono; Hiroaki Shibahara; Osamu Tsutsumi; Yukihiro Terada; Shunsaku Fujii; Kaoru Yanagida; Minesuke Yokoyama; Sueo Niimura; Tsuyoshi Endo; Yoshinori Fukuda; Masato Inoue; Tomohiro Kono; Naoaki Kuji; Fumiko Tawara; Hiroaki Yoshida; Yoshimasa Yokota; Yoshihiro Tada
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2022-04-11

6.  The effects of temperature variation treatments on embryonic development: a mouse study.

Authors:  Dóris Ferreira Moriyama; Dimitra Makri; Mary-Naya Maalouf; Petra Adamova; Gabrielle Ferrante Alves de Moraes; Marcela de Oliveira Pinheiro; Danilo Lessa Bernardineli; Irineu Francisco Delfino Silva Massaia; Walid E Maalouf; Edson Guimarães Lo Turco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Review of investigational medical devices' clinical trials and regulations in Africa as a benchmark for new innovations.

Authors:  Brian Matovu; Mercy Takuwa; Charles Norman Mpaata; Fiona Denison; Noah Kiwanuka; Steff Lewis; John Norrie; Sam Ononge; Owen Muhimbise; Sharon Tuck; Maureen Dimitri Etuket; Robert T Ssekitoleko
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2022-07-28

8.  Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology.

Authors:  Susanna Apter; Thomas Ebner; Thomas Freour; Yves Guns; Borut Kovacic; Nathalie Le Clef; Monica Marques; Marcos Meseguer; Debbie Montjean; Ioannis Sfontouris; Roger Sturmey; Giovanni Coticchio
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-03-19

Review 9.  Oxidative Stress and Assisted Reproduction: A Comprehensive Review of Its Pathophysiological Role and Strategies for Optimizing Embryo Culture Environment.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Israel Maldonado Rosas; Christina Anagnostopoulou; Rossella Cannarella; Florence Boitrelle; Lina Villar Munoz; Renata Finelli; Damayanthi Durairajanayagam; Ralf Henkel; Ramadan Saleh
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.