Literature DB >> 28651888

How can lifeguards recover better? A cross-over study comparing resting, running, and foam rolling.

Anton Kalén1, Alexandra Pérez-Ferreirós2, Roberto Barcala-Furelos3, María Fernández-Méndez1, Alexis Padrón-Cabo1, Jose A Prieto4, Andrés Ríos-Ave1, Cristian Abelairas-Gómez5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of active recovery in form of running or foam rolling on clearing blood lactate compared to remain sitting after a water rescue.
METHOD: A quasi experimental cross-over design was used to test the effectiveness of two active recovery methods: foam rolling (FR) and running (RR), compared with passive recovery (PR) on the blood lactate clearance after performing a water rescue. Twelve lifeguards from Marín (Pontevedra) completed the study. The participants performed a 100-meter water rescue and a 25-minute recovery protocol.
RESULTS: The post recovery lactate levels were significantly lower for foam rolling (4.4±1.5mmol/l, P=0.005, d=0.94) and running (4.9±2.3mmol/l, P=0.027, d=1.21) compared with resting (7.2±2.5mmol/l); there was no significant difference between foam rolling and running (P=1.000).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that surf lifesavers clear out blood lactate more efficient when performing an active recovery protocol. Foam rolling is an effective method of increasing the rate of blood lactate clearance. These two recovery methods are also adequate for surf lifeguards as they do not interfere with the surveillance aspect of their job.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drowning; Foam roller; Lifeguard; Recovery; Rescue

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28651888     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  11 in total

1.  The effect of chest compression frequency on the quality of resuscitation by lifeguards. A prospective randomized crossover multicenter simulation trial.

Authors:  Jacek Smereka; Łukasz Iskrzycki; Elżbieta Makomaska-Szaroszyk; Karol Bielski; Michael Frass; Oliver Robak; Kurt Ruetzler; Michael Czekajło; Antonio Rodríguez-Núnez; Jesús López-Herce; Łukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 2.  Effects of Self-myofascial Release Instruments on Performance and Recovery: An Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Ricardo M Ferreira; Pedro N Martins; Rui S Goncalves
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT DENSITY TYPE FOAM ROLLERS ON KNEE RANGE OF MOTION AND PRESSURE PAIN THRESHOLD: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Kyle R Stull
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06

4.  ROLLER MASSAGE: A COMMENTARY ON CLINICAL STANDARDS AND SURVEY OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PROFESSIONALS- PART 1.

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Kyle R Stull
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

5.  ROLLER MASSAGE: SURVEY OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PROFESSIONALS AND A COMMENTARY ON CLINICAL STANDARDS- PART II.

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Kyle R Stull; Tony Ambler-Wright
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

Review 6.  Accelerating Recovery from Exercise-Induced Muscle Injuries in Triathletes: Considerations for Olympic Distance Races.

Authors:  Thilo Hotfiel; Isabel Mayer; Moritz Huettel; Matthias Wilhelm Hoppe; Martin Engelhardt; Christoph Lutter; Klaus Pöttgen; Rafael Heiss; Tom Kastner; Casper Grim
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-13

7.  Chronic and Residual Effects of a Two-Week Foam Rolling Intervention on Ankle Flexibility and Dynamic Balance.

Authors:  Thomas Christoph Seever; Joel Mason; Astrid Zech
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-02-15

8.  Roller Massage: Comparing the Immediate Post-Treatment Effects Between an Instructional Video and a Self-Preferred Program Using Two Different Density-Type Roller Balls.

Authors:  Scott W Cheatham; Kyle R Stull; Wendy N Batts; Tony Ambler-Wright
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Is Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation a Tool for Recovery after a Water Rescue? A Cross-Over Study with Lifeguards.

Authors:  Roberto Barcala-Furelos; Alicia González-Represas; Ezequiel Rey; Alicia Martínez-Rodríguez; Anton Kalén; Olga Marques; Luís Rama
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Relationship between the Performance in a Maximum Effort Test for Lifeguards and the Time Spent in a Water Rescue.

Authors:  Sergio López-García; Brais Ruibal-Lista; José Palacios-Aguilar; Miguel Santiago-Alonso; José Antonio Prieto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.