Literature DB >> 28651787

A role for proactive control in rapid instructed task learning.

Michael W Cole1, Lauren M Patrick2, Nachshon Meiran3, Todd S Braver2.   

Abstract

Humans are often remarkably fast at learning novel tasks from instructions. Such rapid instructed task learning (RITL) likely depends upon the formation of new associations between long-term memory representations, which must then be actively maintained to enable successful task implementation. Consequently, we hypothesized that RITL relies more heavily on a proactive mode of cognitive control, in which goal-relevant information is actively maintained in preparation for anticipated high control demands. We tested this hypothesis using a recently developed cognitive paradigm consisting of 60 novel tasks involving RITL and 4 practiced tasks, with identical task rules and stimuli used across both task types. A robust behavioral cost was found in novel relative to practiced task performance, which was present even when the two were randomly inter-mixed, such that task-switching effects were equated. Novelty costs were most prominent under time-limited preparation conditions. In self-paced conditions, increased preparation time was found for novel trials, and was selectively associated with enhanced performance, suggesting greater proactive control for novel tasks. These results suggest a key role for proactive cognitive control in the ability to rapidly learn novel tasks from instructions.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Proactive control; Rapid instructed task learning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28651787      PMCID: PMC5742075          DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  33 in total

1.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.

Authors:  U Mayr; R Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-09

3.  Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects.

Authors:  Baptist Liefooghe; Dorit Wenke; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions.

Authors:  Akira Miyake; Naomi P Friedman
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-02

5.  Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

6.  The representation of instructions operates like a prepared reflex: flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S-R instructions.

Authors:  Oshrit Cohen-Kdoshay; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2009

Review 7.  The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Matthew M Botvinick; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  A chronometric analysis of strategy preparation in choice reactions.

Authors:  P Dixon; M A Just
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-11

Review 9.  Rapid instructed task learning: a new window into the human brain's unique capacity for flexible cognitive control.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Patryk Laurent; Andrea Stocco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  The reaction-time task-rule congruency effect is not affected by working memory load: further support for the activated long-term memory hypothesis.

Authors:  Yoav Kessler; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-10-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  Representational Organization of Novel Task Sets during Proactive Encoding.

Authors:  Ana F Palenciano; Carlos González-García; Juan E Arco; Luiz Pessoa; María Ruz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The instruction-based congruency effect predicts task execution efficiency: Evidence from inter- and intra-individual differences.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Berre Deltomme; Baptist Liefooghe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

Review 3.  Neural Mechanisms of Observational Learning: A Neural Working Model.

Authors:  Weixi Kang; Sònia Pineda Hernández; Jie Mei
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.