Literature DB >> 28651744

Eying the future: Eye movement in past and future thinking.

Mohamad El Haj1, Quentin Lenoble2.   

Abstract

We investigated eye movement during past and future thinking. Participants were invited to retrieve past events and to imagine future events while their scan path was recorded by an eye-tracker. Past thinking triggered more fixation (p < .05), and saccade counts (p < .05) than future thinking. Past and future thinking triggered a similar duration of fixations and saccades, as well as a similar amplitude of saccades. Interestingly, participants rated past thinking as more vivid than future thinking (p < .01). Therefore, the vividness of past thinking seems to be accompanied by an increased number of fixations and saccades. Fixations and saccades in past thinking can be interpreted as an attempt by the visual system to find (through saccades) and activate (through fixations) stored memory representations. The same interpretation can be applied to future thinking as this ability requires activation of past experiences. However, future thinking triggers fewer fixations and saccades than past thinking: this may be due to its decreased demand on visual imagery, but could also be related to a potentially deleterious effect of eye movements on spatial imagery required for future thinking.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autobiographical memory; Eye movement; Future thinking; Visual imagery

Year:  2017        PMID: 28651744     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  5 in total

1.  Pupil dilation as an indicator of future thinking.

Authors:  Mohamad El Haj; Ahmed A Moustafa
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Autobiographical Memory Increases Pupil Dilation.

Authors:  Mohamad El Haj; Steve M J Janssen; Karim Gallouj; Quentin Lenoble
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 1.757

3.  Characterising the hippocampal response to perception, construction and complexity.

Authors:  Cornelia McCormick; Marshall A Dalton; Peter Zeidman; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Web-Based Assessment of the Phenomenology of Autobiographical Memories in Young and Older Adults.

Authors:  Manila Vannucci; Carlo Chiorri; Laura Favilli
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 5.  False Memory in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Mohamad El Haj; Fabienne Colombel; Dimitrios Kapogiannis; Karim Gallouj
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.342

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.