David J Cornell1, Stacy L Gnacinski, Barbara B Meyer, Kyle T Ebersole. 1. 1Human Performance and Sport Physiology Laboratory, Integrative Health Care and Performance Unit, Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI; 2Laboratory for Sport Psychology and Performance Excellence, Integrative Health Care and Performance Unit, Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI; and 3Department of Health Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Drake University, Des Moines, IA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To observe longitudinal changes in health and fitness among firefighter recruits. METHODS: Body composition, aerobic capacity, muscular power, muscular strength, and muscular endurance measures were longitudinally collected among 27 male firefighter recruits (mean ± SD, age = 29.9 ± 4.1 yr; height, 179.8 ± 4.6 cm; body mass, 87.2 ± 9.7 kg) at the beginning (W1) and end (W14) of their firefighter training academy, as well as at the end of their probationary period (W38). RESULTS: Repeated-measures multivariate analyses of variance (RM MANOVA) identified significant changes across time among measures of body composition (F10,17 = 30.390, Λ = 0.053, P < 0.001), aerobic capacity (F6,21 = 55.111, Λ = 0.060, P < 0.001), muscular power (F8,17 = 2.785, Λ = 0.433, P = 0.036), muscular strength (F6,20 = 34.908, Λ = 0.087, P < 0.001), and muscular endurance (F4,23 = 25.983, Λ = 0.181, P < 0.001). Follow-up post hoc analyses indicated that all measures, except muscular power, significantly improved from W1 to W14 (P < 0.05). However, significant decrements in many of these measures were also observed from W14 to W38 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that measures of health and fitness among firefighter recruits significantly improved throughout the firefighter training academy (W1 to W14). However, many of these positive physiological adaptations are lost before these recruits finish their probationary period as active-duty firefighters (W14 to W38). These results highlight the importance of developing exercise programming that is designed for the active-duty firefighter cohort population to maintain the beneficial adaptations in health and fitness previously created during the firefighter training academy.
PURPOSE: To observe longitudinal changes in health and fitness among firefighter recruits. METHODS: Body composition, aerobic capacity, muscular power, muscular strength, and muscular endurance measures were longitudinally collected among 27 male firefighter recruits (mean ± SD, age = 29.9 ± 4.1 yr; height, 179.8 ± 4.6 cm; body mass, 87.2 ± 9.7 kg) at the beginning (W1) and end (W14) of their firefighter training academy, as well as at the end of their probationary period (W38). RESULTS: Repeated-measures multivariate analyses of variance (RM MANOVA) identified significant changes across time among measures of body composition (F10,17 = 30.390, Λ = 0.053, P < 0.001), aerobic capacity (F6,21 = 55.111, Λ = 0.060, P < 0.001), muscular power (F8,17 = 2.785, Λ = 0.433, P = 0.036), muscular strength (F6,20 = 34.908, Λ = 0.087, P < 0.001), and muscular endurance (F4,23 = 25.983, Λ = 0.181, P < 0.001). Follow-up post hoc analyses indicated that all measures, except muscular power, significantly improved from W1 to W14 (P < 0.05). However, significant decrements in many of these measures were also observed from W14 to W38 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that measures of health and fitness among firefighter recruits significantly improved throughout the firefighter training academy (W1 to W14). However, many of these positive physiological adaptations are lost before these recruits finish their probationary period as active-duty firefighters (W14 to W38). These results highlight the importance of developing exercise programming that is designed for the active-duty firefighter cohort population to maintain the beneficial adaptations in health and fitness previously created during the firefighter training academy.
Authors: Colin W Bond; Stephanie P Waletzko; Valerie Reed; Ellie Glasner; Benjamin C Noonan Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Fan-Yun Lan; Christopher Scheibler; Maria Soledad Hershey; Juan Luis Romero-Cabrera; Gabriel C Gaviola; Ioanna Yiannakou; Alejandro Fernandez-Montero; Costas A Christophi; David C Christiani; Mercedes Sotos-Prieto; Stefanos N Kales Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Francisco Martín-Rodríguez; Ancor Sanz-García; Raúl López-Izquierdo; Juan F Delgado Benito; José L Martín-Conty; Miguel A Castro Villamor; Guillermo J Ortega Journal: Clin Simul Nurs Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 2.391
Authors: Kyle T Ebersole; David J Cornell; Robert J Flees; Corey M Shemelya; Sabrina E Noel Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Petr Miratsky; Tomas Gryc; Lee Cabell; Frantisek Zahalka; Matej Brozka; Matej Varjan; Tomas Maly Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Annmarie Chizewski; Allyson Box; Richard M Kesler; Steven J Petruzzello Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 3.390