Literature DB >> 28649899

Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories: The effect of memory specificity.

Stephen A Dewhurst1, Rachel J Anderson1, Donna M Berry2, Sarah R Garner3.   

Abstract

Previous research has highlighted the wide individual variability in susceptibility to the false memories produced by the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) procedure. This study investigated whether susceptibility to false memories is influenced by individual differences in the specificity of autobiographical memory retrieval. Memory specificity was measured using the Sentence Completion for Events from the Past Test (SCEPT). Memory specificity did not correlate with correct recognition, but a specific retrieval style was positively correlated with levels of false recognition. It is proposed that the contextual details that frequently accompany false memories of non-studied lures are more accessible in individuals with specific retrieval styles.

Keywords:  False memories; autobiographical memory specificity; individual differences

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28649899     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1345961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  2 in total

1.  Adaptive constructive processes: An episodic specificity induction impacts false recall in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.

Authors:  Preston P Thakral; Kevin P Madore; Aleea L Devitt; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-03-04

2.  The role of KIBRA in reconstructive episodic memory.

Authors:  Armin Zlomuzica; Friederike Preusser; Susanna Roberts; Marcella L Woud; Kathryn J Lester; Ekrem Dere; Thalia C Eley; Jürgen Margraf
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.354

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.