Literature DB >> 28648909

Clinical Efficacy and Its Prognostic Factor of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Annuloplasty and Nucleoplasty for the Treatment of Patients with Discogenic Low Back Pain.

Jung Hwan Lee1, Sang-Ho Lee2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The choice of appropriate treatment of discogenic low back pain (DLBP) frequently is difficult. This study sought to identify the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar annuloplasty and nucleoplasty (PELAN) to treat patients with DLBP and to investigate prognostic clinical or radiologic variables.
METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with a diagnosis of DLBP who underwent PELAN were included. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index % (ODI%), and modified Macnab criteria were measured at short-term (3-4 weeks) and long-term follow-up period (at least 12 months) to investigate clinical efficacy of PELAN. The subjects were defined as successful group in case of 50% or more reduction of NRS, 40% or more reduction of ODI%, and good or excellent response of Macnab criteria. Clinical and radiologic variables were compared between successful and unsuccessful outcomes group to determine prognostic variables.
RESULTS: NRS and ODI% were significantly reduced at short- and long-term follow-up after PELAN. Sixty-two (69.7%) and 68 (76.4%) obtained successful NRS reduction and 59 (66.3%) and 68 (76.4%) accomplished successful ODI% reduction at short-term and long-term follow-up, respectively. Successful Mcnab response was found in 61% at short term and 65.2% at long term. Pain during waist flexion among clinical variables was significantly related to good clinical outcomes and Modic change among radiologic variables was significantly related to poor clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: PELAN provided favorable outcomes in patients with DLBP who were refractory to conservative treatments. Flexion pain was good prognostic, and Modic change was a poor prognostic variable.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Annuloplasty; Back pain; Discogenic pain; Endoscopy; Function; Lumbar; Minimal invasive procedure; Nucleoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28648909     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

1.  The Association Between Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment and Persistent Low Back Pain After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Mild L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Yuan; Guang Li; Yan Liu; Quan Zhang; Zhi-Shuai Ren; Rong Tian
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-05-10

2.  Efficacy of transforaminal laser annuloplasty versus intradiscal radiofrequency annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain.

Authors:  Chan Hong Park; Kyoung Kyu Lee; Sang Ho Lee
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2019-04-01

3.  Author's reply.

Authors:  Chan Hong Park
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2019-10-01

4.  Reoccurring discogenic low back pain (LBP) after discoblock treated by oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF).

Authors:  Junhui Liu; Yongqing He; Bao Huang; Xuyang Zhang; Zhi Shan; Jian Chen; Shunwu Fan; Fengdong Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.