Literature DB >> 28648568

Application of machine learning classification for structural brain MRI in mood disorders: Critical review from a clinical perspective.

Yong-Ku Kim1, Kyoung-Sae Na2.   

Abstract

Mood disorders are a highly prevalent group of mental disorders causing substantial socioeconomic burden. There are various methodological approaches for identifying the underlying mechanisms of the etiology, symptomatology, and therapeutics of mood disorders; however, neuroimaging studies have provided the most direct evidence for mood disorder neural substrates by visualizing the brains of living individuals. The prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, ventral striatum, and corpus callosum are associated with depression and bipolar disorder. Identifying the distinct and common contributions of these anatomical regions to depression and bipolar disorder have broadened and deepened our understanding of mood disorders. However, the extent to which neuroimaging research findings contribute to clinical practice in the real-world setting is unclear. As traditional or non-machine learning MRI studies have analyzed group-level differences, it is not possible to directly translate findings from research to clinical practice; the knowledge gained pertains to the disorder, but not to individuals. On the other hand, a machine learning approach makes it possible to provide individual-level classifications. For the past two decades, many studies have reported on the classification accuracy of machine learning-based neuroimaging studies from the perspective of diagnosis and treatment response. However, for the application of a machine learning-based brain MRI approach in real world clinical settings, several major issues should be considered. Secondary changes due to illness duration and medication, clinical subtypes and heterogeneity, comorbidities, and cost-effectiveness restrict the generalization of the current machine learning findings. Sophisticated classification of clinical and diagnostic subtypes is needed. Additionally, as the approach is inevitably limited by sample size, multi-site participation and data-sharing are needed in the future.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipolar disorder; Depression; MRI; Machine learning; Neuroimaging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28648568     DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0278-5846            Impact factor:   5.067


  10 in total

1.  Towards enhanced metabolomic data analysis of mass spectrometry image: Multivariate Curve Resolution and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Xiang Tian; Genwei Zhang; Yihan Shao; Zhibo Yang
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 6.558

2.  Automated classification of depression from structural brain measures across two independent community-based cohorts.

Authors:  Aleks Stolicyn; Mathew A Harris; Xueyi Shen; Miruna C Barbu; Mark J Adams; Emma L Hawkins; Laura de Nooij; Hon Wah Yeung; Alison D Murray; Stephen M Lawrie; J Douglas Steele; Andrew M McIntosh; Heather C Whalley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Machine Learning for Predicting Individual Severity of Blepharospasm Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Yanan Gao; Ying Liu; Yaomin Guo; Zhicong Yan; Zilin Ou; Linchang Zhong; Chuanmiao Xie; Jinsheng Zeng; Weixi Zhang; Kangqiang Peng; Qingwen Lv
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  The Role of Machine Learning in Diagnosing Bipolar Disorder: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Zainab Jan; Noor Ai-Ansari; Osama Mousa; Alaa Abd-Alrazaq; Arfan Ahmed; Tanvir Alam; Mowafa Househ
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Advances in Using MRI to Estimate the Risk of Future Outcomes in Mental Health - Are We Getting There?

Authors:  Aleix Solanes; Joaquim Radua
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.435

6.  Performances of whole-brain dynamic and static functional connectivity fingerprinting in machine learning-based classification of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Heng Niu; Weirong Li; Guiquan Wang; Qiong Hu; Rui Hao; Tianliang Li; Fan Zhang; Tao Cheng
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 7.  Machine learning for autism spectrum disorder diagnosis using structural magnetic resonance imaging: Promising but challenging.

Authors:  Reem Ahmed Bahathiq; Haneen Banjar; Ahmed K Bamaga; Salma Kammoun Jarraya
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  Identifying resting-state effective connectivity abnormalities in drug-naïve major depressive disorder diagnosis via graph convolutional networks.

Authors:  Eunji Jun; Kyoung-Sae Na; Wooyoung Kang; Jiyeon Lee; Heung-Il Suk; Byung-Joo Ham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Association between personality traits and suicidality by age groups in a nationally representative Korean sample.

Authors:  Kyoung-Sae Na; Seo-Eun Cho; Jin Pyo Hong; Jun-Young Lee; Sung Man Chang; Hong Jin Jeon; Seong-Jin Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 10.  Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Predicting Treatment Response and Recurrence of Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Seung-Gul Kang; Seo-Eun Cho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.