| Literature DB >> 28648228 |
Lew Hardy1, Matthew Barlow2, Lynne Evans3, Tim Rees4, Tim Woodman2, Chelsea Warr5.
Abstract
Participants were 32 former GB athletes from Olympic sports, 16 Super-Elite athletes who had won multiple medals at major championships, and 16 matched Elite athletes who had not. In-depth interviews with the athletes, their coaches, and one of their parents explored all psychosocial aspects of their development and careers. Content analyses revealed that there were no differences between Super-Elite and Elite athletes with regard to family values, conscientiousness, or commitment to training. However, the two groups were found to be different with regard to: (1) the experience of a foundational negative life event coupled with a foundational positive sport-related event; (2) the experience of a career turning point that enhanced motivation and focus for their sport; (3) need for success; (4) obsessiveness and/or perfectionism with regard to training and performance; (5) ruthlessness and/or selfishness in the pursuit of their sporting goals; (6) dual focus on both mastery and outcome; (7) the use of counterphobic attitudes and/or total preparation to maintain higher levels of performance under pressure; and (8) the relative importance of sport over other aspects of life. The results are discussed within the context of psychodynamic theory, and recommendations are made for both applied implications and future research.Entities:
Keywords: Athletes; Biographies; Development; Elite; Super-Elite
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28648228 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.03.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Brain Res ISSN: 0079-6123 Impact factor: 2.453