Literature DB >> 28648148

Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer study).

Mark B Gabbay1, Adele Ring1, Richard Byng2, Pippa Anderson3, Rod S Taylor4, Caryn Matthews5, Tirril Harris6, Vashti Berry4, Paula Byrne1, Elliot Carter2, Pam Clarke1, Laura Cocking2, Suzanne Edwards7, Richard Emsley8, Mauro Fornasiero2, Lucy Frith1, Shaun Harris3, Peter Huxley9, Siw Jones5, Peter Kinderman1, Michael King10, Liv Kosnes3, Daniel Marshall2, Dave Mercer1, Carl May11, Debbie Nolan5, Ceri Phillips3, Tim Rawcliffe12, Alexandra V Sardani3, Elizabeth Shaw2, Sam Thompson1, Jane Vickery2, Brian Wainman2, Mark Warner2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression and debt are common in the UK. Debt Counselling for Depression in Primary Care: an adaptive randomised controlled pilot trial (DeCoDer) aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the addition of a primary care debt counselling advice service to usual care for patients with depression and debt. However, the study was terminated early during the internal pilot trial phase because of recruitment delays. This report describes the rationale, methods and findings of the pilot study, and implications for future research.
OBJECTIVES: The overarching aim of the internal pilot was to identify and resolve problems, thereby assessing the feasibility of the main trial. The specific objectives were to confirm methods for practice recruitment and the ability to recruit patients via the proposed approaches; to determine the acceptability of the study interventions and outcome measures; to assess contamination; to confirm the randomisation method for main trial and the level of participant attrition; and to check the robustness of data collection systems.
DESIGN: An adaptive, parallel, two-group multicentre randomised controlled pilot trial with a nested mixed-methods process and economic evaluation. Both individual- and cluster (general practice)-level were was used in the pilot phase to assign participants to intervention or control groups.
SETTING: General practices in England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals were included who were aged ≥ 18 years, scored ≥ 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory II and self-identified as having debt worries. The main exclusion criteria were being actively suicidal or psychotic and/or severely depressed and unresponsive to treatment; having a severe addiction to alcohol/illicit drugs; being unable/unwilling to give written informed consent; currently participating in other research including follow-up phases; having received Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) debt advice in the past year; and not wanting debt advice via a general practice.
INTERVENTIONS: The participants in the intervention group were given debt advice provided by the CAB and shared biopsychosocial assessment, in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) and two debt advice leaflets. The participants in the control group were given advice leaflets provided by the general practitioner and TAU only. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Outcomes of the pilot trial - the proportion of eligible patients who consented, the number of participants recruited compared with target, assessment of contamination, and assessment of patient satisfaction with intervention and outcome measures. (2) Participant outcomes - primary - Beck Depression Inventory II; secondary - psychological well-being, health and social care utilisation, service satisfaction, substance misuse, record of priority/non-priority debts, life events and difficulties, and explanatory measures. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (pre-randomisation) and at 4 months post randomisation. Other data sources - qualitative interviews were conducted with participants, clinicians and CAB advisors.
RESULTS: Of the 238 expressions of interest screened, 61 participants (26%) were recruited and randomised (32 in the intervention group and 29 in the control group). All participants provided baseline outcomes and 52 provided the primary outcome at 4 months' follow-up (14.7% dropout). Seventeen participants allocated to the intervention saw a CAB advisor. Descriptive statistics are reported for participants with complete outcomes at baseline and 4 months' follow-up. Our qualitative findings suggest that the relationship between debt and depression is complex, and the impact of each on the other is compounded by other psychological, social and contextual influences.
CONCLUSIONS: As a result of low recruitment, this trial was terminated at the internal pilot phase and was too small for inferential statistical analysis. We recommend ways to reduce this risk when conducting complex trials among vulnerable populations recruited in community settings. These cover trial design, the design and delivery of interventions, recruitment strategies and support for sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN79705874. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 35. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Mark Gabbay and Adele Ring are part-funded by NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) North West Coast and Richard Byng and Rod S Taylor, Vashti Berry and Elizabeth Shaw part-funded by NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28648148      PMCID: PMC5502372          DOI: 10.3310/hta21350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  5 in total

1.  Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Adel Elfeky; Shaun Treweek; Karin Hannes; Hanne Bruhn; Cynthia Fraser; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 2.  Interventions to reduce the impact of unemployment and economic hardship on mental health in the general population: a systematic review.

Authors:  T H M Moore; N Kapur; K Hawton; A Richards; C Metcalfe; D Gunnell
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carl R May; Amanda Cummings; Melissa Girling; Mike Bracher; Frances S Mair; Christine M May; Elizabeth Murray; Michelle Myall; Tim Rapley; Tracy Finch
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  The Acceptability and Initial Effectiveness of "Space From Money Worries": An Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention to Tackle the Link Between Financial Difficulties and Poor Mental Health.

Authors:  Thomas Richardson; Angel Enrique; Caroline Earley; Adedeji Adegoke; Douglas Hiscock; Derek Richards
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-14

5.  The help for people with money, employment or housing problems (HOPE) intervention: pilot randomised trial with mixed methods feasibility research.

Authors:  M C Barnes; A M Haase; L J Scott; M-J Linton; A M Bard; J L Donovan; R Davies; S Dursley; S Williams; D Elliott; J Potokar; N Kapur; K Hawton; R C O'Connor; W Hollingworth; C Metcalfe; D Gunnell
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-11-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.