Mike Firn1, Maria Alonso-Vicente1, Dieneke Hubbeling1, Jess Holley2, Sarah Jane White3, Ben Jones1. 1. a Of South West London & St. George's Mental Health NHS Trust , London , UK. 2. b Department of Mental Health , Middlesex University , London , UK , and. 3. c Of Population Health Research Institute, St Georges University of London , London , UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This is the third in a series of papers on patient outcomes and other consequences of the withdrawal of specialist assertive outreach (AO) teams. We previously reported positive outcomes for patients receiving a less intensive service at up to four years, but had not systematically interviewed patients. AIMS: To test the generalizability of earlier findings through replication in another service. To complement the analysis of service utilisation with patient reported experience between the two treatment models. METHODS: Service level evaluation 12 months pre and post service change for 55 eligible AO patients. Thirty three consenting patients answered validated questionnaires. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant changes in hospital bed use comparing the year before and the year after the change (850-712 bed days, median 34-20). No significant change in crisis activity occurred despite a highly significant reduction in face to face contacts from a mean of 90-40. There were no significant changes in patient reported experience. CONCLUSIONS: Results are consistent with earlier studies. Reinforcing community mental health teams can provide an integrated service model that is clinically effective and equally acceptable to patients, making this a viable and affordable alternative to orthodox AO teams.
BACKGROUND: This is the third in a series of papers on patient outcomes and other consequences of the withdrawal of specialist assertive outreach (AO) teams. We previously reported positive outcomes for patients receiving a less intensive service at up to four years, but had not systematically interviewed patients. AIMS: To test the generalizability of earlier findings through replication in another service. To complement the analysis of service utilisation with patient reported experience between the two treatment models. METHODS: Service level evaluation 12 months pre and post service change for 55 eligible AO patients. Thirty three consenting patients answered validated questionnaires. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant changes in hospital bed use comparing the year before and the year after the change (850-712 bed days, median 34-20). No significant change in crisis activity occurred despite a highly significant reduction in face to face contacts from a mean of 90-40. There were no significant changes in patient reported experience. CONCLUSIONS: Results are consistent with earlier studies. Reinforcing community mental health teams can provide an integrated service model that is clinically effective and equally acceptable to patients, making this a viable and affordable alternative to orthodox AO teams.
Authors: Angela Hassiotis; Amy Walsh; Jessica Budgett; Isobel Harrison; Rebecca Jones; Nicola Morant; Ken Courtenay; Elisabeth Victoria Crossey; Ian Hall; Renee Romeo; Laurence George Taggart; Peter E Langdon; Victoria Ratti; Vincent Kirchner; Brynmor Lloyd-Evans Journal: BJPsych Open Date: 2020-02-11