Literature DB >> 28647777

The effect of low- and high-power microwave irradiation on in vitro grown Sequoia plants and their recovery after cryostorage.

A Halmagyi1, E Surducan2, V Surducan2.   

Abstract

Two distinct microwave power levels and techniques have been studied in two cases: low-power microwave (LPM) irradiation on in vitro Sequoia plants and high-power microwave (HPM) exposure on recovery rates of cryostored (-196°C) Sequoia shoot apices. Experimental variants for LPM exposure included: (a) in vitro plants grown in regular conditions (at 24 ± 1°C during a 16-h light photoperiod with a light intensity of 39.06 μEm-2 s-1 photosynthetically active radiation), (b) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with controlled environment without microwave irradiation, and (c) in vitro plants grown in the anechoic chamber with LPM irradiation for various times (5, 15, 30, 40 days). In comparison to control plants, significant differences in shoot multiplication and growth parameters (length of shoots and roots) were observed after 40 days of LPM exposure. An opposite effect was achieved regarding the content of total soluble proteins, which decreased with increasing exposure time to LPM. HPM irradiation was tested as a novel rewarming method following storage in liquid nitrogen. To our knowledge, this is the first report using this type of rewarming method. Although, shoot tips subjected to HPM exposure showed 28% recovery following cryostorage compared to 44% for shoot tips rewarmed in liquid medium at 22 ± 1 °C, we consider that the method represent a basis and can be further improved. The results lead to the overall conclusion that LPM had a stimulating effect on growth and multiplication of in vitro Sequoia plants, while the HPM used for rewarming of cryopreserved apices was not effective to achieve high rates of regrowth after liquid nitrogen exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryopreservation; Irradiation; Microwaves; Redwood; Sequoia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28647777      PMCID: PMC6104903          DOI: 10.1007/s10867-017-9457-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Phys        ISSN: 0092-0606            Impact factor:   1.365


  13 in total

1.  Cryopreservation of embryogenic cultures of Quercus robur using desiccation and vitrification procedures.

Authors:  M T Martínez; A Ballester; A M Vieitez
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  Magnetic field exposure stiffens regenerating plant protoplast cell walls.

Authors:  Toshihiko Haneda; Yuu Fujimura; Masaaki Iino
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.010

3.  Microwave irradiation affects gene expression in plants.

Authors:  A Vian; D Roux; S Girard; P Bonnet; F Paladian; E Davies; G Ledoigt
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2006-03

4.  Cellular stress responses: cell survival and cell death.

Authors:  Simone Fulda; Adrienne M Gorman; Osamu Hori; Afshin Samali
Journal:  Int J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-21

5.  Influence of physical parameters on the germ-reducing effect of microwave irradiation on medicinal plants.

Authors:  A Brantner; W Lücke
Journal:  Pharmazie       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.267

6.  Microwave treatment of eight seconds protects cells of Isatis indigotica from enhanced UV-B radiation lesions.

Authors:  Yi-Ping Chen
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 7.  Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Reduced growth of soybean seedlings after exposure to weak microwave radiation from GSM 900 mobile phone and base station.

Authors:  Malka N Halgamuge; See Kye Yak; Jacob L Eberhardt
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.010

9.  Influence of microwave frequency electromagnetic radiation on terpene emission and content in aromatic plants.

Authors:  Maria-Loredana Soran; Manuela Stan; Ülo Niinemets; Lucian Copolovici
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.549

Review 10.  Plant Responses to High Frequency Electromagnetic Fields.

Authors:  Alain Vian; Eric Davies; Michel Gendraud; Pierre Bonnet
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 3.246

View more
  1 in total

1.  Proteomic Analysis of Irradiation with Millimeter Waves on Soybean Growth under Flooding Conditions.

Authors:  Zhuoheng Zhong; Takashi Furuya; Kimitaka Ueno; Hisateru Yamaguchi; Keisuke Hitachi; Kunihiro Tsuchida; Masahiko Tani; Jingkui Tian; Setsuko Komatsu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.