Literature DB >> 28647537

Variation in compulsory psychiatric inpatient admission in England: a cross-classified, multilevel analysis.

Scott Weich1, Orla McBride2, Liz Twigg3, Craig Duncan3, Patrick Keown4, David Crepaz-Keay5, Eva Cyhlarova6, Helen Parsons7, Jan Scott4, Kamaldeep Bhui8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increasing rate of compulsory admission to psychiatric inpatient beds in England is worrying. Studying variation between places and services could be key to identifying targets for interventions to reverse this trend. We modelled spatial variation in compulsory admissions in England using national patient-level data and quantified the extent to which patient, local-area, and service-setting characteristics accounted for this variation.
METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional, multilevel analysis of the 2010-11 Mental Health Minimum Data Set (MHMDS). Data from eight provider trusts were excluded, including three independent provider trusts that lacked spatial identification codes. We excluded patients detained under sections of the Mental Health Act concerned only with conveyance to, or assessment in, a registered Place of Safety, or for short-term (≤72 h) assessment only, as these do not in themselves necessarily mean that the person will be admitted to an inpatient mental health bed. MHMDS contained reasonably complete data for a limited number of patient characteristics, namely age, sex, and ethnicity; however, several patient-level variables could not be included in our analysis because of high levels of missing data. Multilevel models were applied with MLwiN to estimate variation in compulsory admission, starting with null (unconditional) models that partitioned total variance in compulsory admission between each level in the model. The primary outcome was compulsory admission to a psychiatric inpatient bed, compared with people admitted voluntarily or receiving only community-based care.
FINDINGS: Data were available for 1 238 188 patients, covering 64 National Health Service provider trusts (93%) and 31 865 census lower super output areas (LSOAs; 98%). 7·5% and 5·6% of the variance in compulsory admission occurred at LSOA level and provider trust levels, respectively, after adjusting for patient characteristics. Black patients were almost three times more likely to be admitted compulsorily than were white patients (odds ratio [OR] 2·94, 95% CI 2·90-2·98). Compulsory admission was greater in more deprived areas (OR 1·22, 1·18-1·27) and in areas with more non-white residents (OR 1·51, 1·43-1·59), after adjusting for confounders.
INTERPRETATION: Rates of compulsory admission to inpatient psychiatric beds vary significantly between local areas and services, independent of patient, area, and service characteristics. Compulsory admission rates seem to reflect local factors, especially socioeconomic and ethnic population composition. Understanding how these factors condition access to, and use of, mental health care is likely to be important for developing interventions to reduce compulsion. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28647537     DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30207-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry        ISSN: 2215-0366            Impact factor:   27.083


  22 in total

Review 1.  Reducing coercion in mental healthcare.

Authors:  S P Sashidharan; Roberto Mezzina; Dainius Puras
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 6.892

2.  Determinants of compulsory hospitalisation at admission and in the course of inpatient treatment in people with mental disorders-a retrospective analysis of health records of the four psychiatric hospitals of the city of Cologne.

Authors:  Sönke Johann Peters; Mario Schmitz-Buhl; Olaf Karasch; Jürgen Zielasek; Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.144

3.  Ethnic inequalities and pathways to care in psychosis in England: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kristoffer Halvorsrud; James Nazroo; Michaela Otis; Eva Brown Hajdukova; Kamaldeep Bhui
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Ethnic variations in compulsory detention under the Mental Health Act: a systematic review and meta-analysis of international data.

Authors:  Phoebe Barnett; Euan Mackay; Hannah Matthews; Rebecca Gate; Helen Greenwood; Kevin Ariyo; Kamaldeep Bhui; Kristoffer Halvorsrud; Stephen Pilling; Shubulade Smith
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 27.083

5.  Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Compulsory Psychiatric Admissions: A Rapid Evidence Synthesis.

Authors:  Jessica K Bone; Tayla McCloud; Hannah R Scott; Karen Machin; Sarah Markham; Karen Persaud; Sonia Johnson; Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-04-09

6.  Characteristics of Psychiatric Emergency Situations and the Decision-Making Process Leading to Involuntary Admission.

Authors:  Silvan Marty; Matthias Jaeger; Sonja Moetteli; Anastasia Theodoridou; Erich Seifritz; Florian Hotzy
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Clinical and social factors associated with involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation in children and adolescents: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Susan Walker; Phoebe Barnett; Ramya Srinivasan; Esha Abrol; Sonia Johnson
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2021-04-28

8.  Evaluating the effects of community treatment orders (CTOs) in England using the Mental Health Services Dataset (MHSDS): protocol for a national, population-based study.

Authors:  Scott Weich; Craig Duncan; Kamaldeep Bhui; Alastair Canaway; David Crepaz-Keay; Patrick Keown; Jason Madan; Orla McBride; Graham Moon; Helen Parsons; Swaran Singh; Liz Twigg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The Implementation of China's Mental Health Law-Defined Risk Criteria for Involuntary Admission: A National Cross-Sectional Study of Involuntarily Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Feng Jiang; Huixuan Zhou; Jeffrey J Rakofsky; Linlin Hu; Tingfang Liu; Huanzhong Liu; Yuanli Liu; Yi-Lang Tang
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Factors associated with involuntary hospitalisation for psychiatric patients in Switzerland: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Benedetta Silva; Philippe Golay; Stéphane Morandi
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-29       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.