Literature DB >> 28647520

Percutaneous Intramedullary Screw Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures: A Case Series and Systematic Review.

Vladimir V Loukachov1, Merel F N Birnie2, Siem A Dingemans2, Vincent M de Jong3, Tim Schepers4.   

Abstract

The current reference standard for unstable ankle fractures is open reduction and internal fixation using a plate and lag screws. This approach requires extensive dissection and wound complications are not uncommon. The use of intramedullary screw fixation might overcome these issues. The aim of our study was to provide an overview of the published data regarding intramedullary screw fixation of fibula fractures combined with a small consecutive case series. We performed a search of published studies to identify the studies in which fibula fractures were treated with percutaneous intramedullary screw fixation. Additionally, all consecutive patients treated for an unstable ankle fracture in a level 1 trauma center using an intramedullary screw were retrospectively included. The literature search identified 6 studies with a total of 180 patients. Wound infection was seen in 1 patient (0.6%), anatomic reduction was achieved in 168 patients (93.3%), and a loss of reduction was seen in 2 patients (1.1%). Implant removal was deemed necessary in 3 patients (1.7%) and nonunion was seen is 2 patients (1.1%). A total of 11 patients, in whom no wound complications occurred, were included in our study. The follow-up duration was a minimum of 12 months. A secondary dislocation was seen in 1 patient, and delayed union was observed after 7.5 months in 1 other patient. In conclusion, intramedullary screw fixation is a safe and adequate method to use for fibula fractures, with a low risk of wound complications. Additional research regarding functional outcome is warranted.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle fracture; complication rate; intramedullary devices; wound complications

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28647520     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  5 in total

1.  Minifragment plating of the fibula in unstable ankle fractures.

Authors:  D Penning; C A L Jonker; R Buijsman; J A Halm; T Schepers
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Can CT-based assessment of lateral malleolus anatomy indicate when and how to perform an intramedullary fixation in distal fibula fractures? An analysis of 150 ankles.

Authors:  Vincenzo Giordano; Pedro Henrique Azevedo; Caio Peres; Marcelo Perucci; Matheus Rodrigues; Rafael Meireles; Robinson Esteves Pires; Alexandre Godoy-Santos; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-08-19

Review 3.  Intramedullary fixation of fibula fractures: A systematic review.

Authors:  Henrik C Bäcker; J Turner Vosseller
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-24

4.  Evaluation of the internal fixation effect of nano-calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/poly-amino acid composite screws for intraarticular fractures in rabbits.

Authors:  Zhenyu Dai; Yue Li; Yonggang Yan; Ruijie Wan; Qiang Ran; Weizhong Lu; Bo Qiao; Hong Li
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-10-18

5.  The AO triangular external fixator: a backup option in the treatment of ankle fractures in geriatric patients?

Authors:  Robert Hennings; Ulrich J Spiegl; Johannes K M Fakler; Annette B Ahrberg
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-11-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.