Literature DB >> 28647254

Quantifying public health benefits of environmental strategy of PM2.5 air quality management in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China.

Li Chen1, Mengshuang Shi1, Suhuan Li1, Shuang Gao1, Hui Zhang1, Yanling Sun1, Jian Mao1, Zhipeng Bai2, Zhongliang Wang3, Jiang Zhou1.   

Abstract

In 2013, China issued "Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan (Action Plan)" to improve air quality. To assess the benefits of this program in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region, where the density of population and emissions vary greatly, we simulated the air quality benefit based on BenMAP to satisfy the Action Plan. In this study, we estimate PM2.5 concentration using Voronoi spatial interpolation method on a grid with a spatial resolution of 1×1km2. Combined with the exposure-response function between PM2.5 concentration and health endpoints, health effects of PM2.5 exposure are analyzed. The economic loss is assessed by using the willingness to pay (WTP) method and human capital (HC) method. When the PM2.5 concentration falls by 25% in BTH and reached 60μg/m3 in Beijing, the avoiding deaths will be in the range of 3175 to 14051 based on different functions each year. Of the estimated mortality attributable to all causes, 3117 annual deaths were due to lung cancer, 1924 - 6318 annual deaths were due to cardiovascular, and 343 - 1697 annual deaths were due to respiratory. Based on WTP, the estimated monetary values for the avoided cases of all cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, respiratory mortality and lung cancer ranged from 1110 to 29632, 673 to 13325, 120 to 3579, 1091 to 6574 million yuan, respectively. Based on HC, the corresponding values for the avoided cases of these four mortalities were 267 to 1178, 161 to 529, 29 to 143 and 261 million yuan, respectively.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei; BenMAP; Health benefits; PM(2.5)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28647254     DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2016.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)        ISSN: 1001-0742            Impact factor:   5.565


  5 in total

1.  A comparative study on arsenic fractions in indoor/outdoor particulate matters: a case in Baoding, China.

Authors:  Kai-Qiang He; Chun-Gang Yuan; Lian-Qing Yin; Ke-Gang Zhang; Pei-Yao Xu; Jiao-Jiao Xie; Yi-Wen Shen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  A review on factors influencing fog formation, classification, forecasting, detection and impacts.

Authors:  Kanchan Lakra; Kirti Avishek
Journal:  Rend Lincei Sci Fis Nat       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Spatial Characteristics and Factor Analysis of Pollution Emission from Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China.

Authors:  Beibei Zhang; Sheng Wu; Shifen Cheng; Feng Lu; And Peng Peng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Assessment of the Dynamic Exposure to PM2.5 Based on Hourly Cell Phone Location and Land Use Regression Model in Beijing.

Authors:  Junli Liu; Panli Cai; Jin Dong; Junshun Wang; Runkui Li; Xianfeng Song
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  PM2.5-Related Health Economic Benefits Evaluation Based on Air Improvement Action Plan in Wuhan City, Middle China.

Authors:  Zhiguang Qu; Xiaoying Wang; Fei Li; Yanan Li; Xiyao Chen; Min Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.