Literature DB >> 28647227

In vivo cellular reactions to different biomaterials-Physiological and pathological aspects and their consequences.

Sarah Al-Maawi1, Anna Orlowska1, Robert Sader1, C James Kirkpatrick1, Shahram Ghanaati2.   

Abstract

Biomaterials are widely used in guided bone regeneration (GBR) and guided tissue regeneration (GTR). After application, there is an interaction between the host immune system and the implanted biomaterial, leading to a biomaterial-specific cellular reaction. The present review focuses on cellular reactions to numerous biomaterials in vivo with consideration of different implantation models and microenvironments in different species, such as subcutaneous implantation in mice and rats, a muscle model in goats and a femur model in rabbits. Additionally, cellular reactions to different biomaterials in various clinical indications within the oro-maxillofacial surgical field were considered. Two types of cellular reactions were observed. There was a physiological reaction with the induction of only mononuclear cells and a pathological reaction with the induction of multinucleated giant cells (MNGCs). Attention was directed to the frequently observed MNGCs and consequences of their appearance within the implantation region. MNGCs have different subtypes. Therefore, the present review addresses the different morphological phenotypes observed within the biomaterial implantation bed and discusses the critical role of MNGCs, their subtypes and their precursors as well as comparing the characteristics and differences between biomaterial-related MNGCs and osteoclasts. Polymeric biomaterials that only induced mononuclear cells underwent integration and maintained their integrity, while polymeric biomaterials that induced MNGCs underwent disintegration with material breakdown and loss of integrity. Hence, there is a question regarding whether our attention should be directed to alternative biological concepts, in combination with biomaterials that induce a physiological mononuclear cellular reaction to optimize biomaterial-based tissue regeneration.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cellular inflammatory response; Disintegration; Integration; Multinucleated giant cells; Tissue engineering; Vascularization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28647227     DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2017.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Immunol        ISSN: 1044-5323            Impact factor:   11.130


  24 in total

Review 1.  Achieving Controlled Biomolecule-Biomaterial Conjugation.

Authors:  Christopher D Spicer; E Thomas Pashuck; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Osseointegration mechanisms: a proteomic approach.

Authors:  N Araújo-Gomes; F Romero-Gavilán; I García-Arnáez; C Martínez-Ramos; A M Sánchez-Pérez; M Azkargorta; F Elortza; J J Martín de Llano; M Gurruchaga; I Goñi; J Suay
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 3.  Host-biomaterial interactions in mesh complications after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Roxanna E Abhari; Matthew L Izett-Kay; Hayley L Morris; Rufus Cartwright; Sarah J B Snelling
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Comparison of the Validity of Enzymatic and Immunohistochemical Detection of Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) in the Context of Biocompatibility Analyses of Bone Substitutes.

Authors:  Mike Barbeck; Tim Fienitz; Anne-Kathrin Jung; Ole Jung; Said Alkildani; Daniel Rothamel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 5.  Current Methods for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Repair and Regeneration.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Dominik Saul; Kai Oliver Böker; Jennifer Ernst; Wolfgang Lehman; Arndt F Schilling
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Evaluation of Fibrin-Agarose Tissue-Like Hydrogels Biocompatibility for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Fernando Campos; Ana Belen Bonhome-Espinosa; Jesús Chato-Astrain; David Sánchez-Porras; Óscar Darío García-García; Ramón Carmona; Modesto T López-López; Miguel Alaminos; Víctor Carriel; Ismael A Rodriguez
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-16

7.  Microenvironment-responsive immunoregulatory electrospun fibers for promoting nerve function recovery.

Authors:  Kun Xi; Yong Gu; Jincheng Tang; Hao Chen; Yun Xu; Liang Wu; Feng Cai; Lianfu Deng; Huilin Yang; Qin Shi; Wenguo Cui; Liang Chen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  In vivo Implantation of a Bovine-Derived Collagen Membrane Leads to Changes in the Physiological Cellular Pattern of Wound Healing by the Induction of Multinucleated Giant Cells: An Adverse Reaction?

Authors:  Sarah Al-Maawi; Chakorn Vorakulpipat; Anna Orlowska; Tomislav A Zrnc; Robert A Sader; C James Kirkpatrick; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-08-14

9.  Laminin-Coated Electrospun Regenerated Silk Fibroin Mats Promote Neural Progenitor Cell Proliferation, Differentiation, and Survival in vitro.

Authors:  Guangfei Li; Kai Chen; Dan You; Mingyu Xia; Wen Li; Suna Fan; Renjie Chai; Yaopeng Zhang; Huawei Li; Shan Sun
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08-06

10.  In Vivo Disintegration and Bioresorption of a Nacre-Inspired Graphene-Silk Film Caused by the Foreign-Body Reaction.

Authors:  Linhao Li; Yanbing Liang; Guohang Wang; Peng Xu; Lingbing Yang; Sen Hou; Jin Zhou; Lizhen Wang; Xiaoming Li; Li Yang; Yubo Fan
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.